Introduction
Artificial Intelligence is rapidly becoming ubiquitous and indispensable. Predictions as to the future of AI range between two extremes. AI will save humanity and usher in a Golden Age for Mankind. An age that will make the Greek Golden Age seem trivial. Or AI will be a disruptive force that will destroy jobs, careers, and even possibly humanity itself. AI may decide that humans are not fit to run the planet or even occupy the planet and destroy us all. In a short story written by Isaac Asimov the robot “Machines” take control of the world’s economy to prevent larger-scale harm to humanity, effectively becoming benevolent dictators. — “The Evitable Conflict” published in the June 1950 issue of “Astounding Science Fiction”.
Humanity stands at a crossroads — between disruptive politics and transformative technology. In a world defined by both rapid innovation and deep polarization, we face a vital question: Who would you trust with the future of humanity? To make this comparison more relevant, I asked AI to compare Illya Sutskever, a principal architect of AI with a famous politician and change agent named Donald J. Trump. Who I asked would you trust to lead the world into a Golden Age? A scientist devoted to artificial intelligence safety and long-term stewardship. Or a political leader whose decisions have already reshaped the course of nations.
The Scientist: Ilya Sutskever
Ilya Sutskever is one of the world’s foremost AI researchers, co-founder and former chief scientist of OpenAI. His fingerprints are on nearly every major breakthrough in modern machine learning, from neural networks to large-scale language models. But what sets him apart is not just his technical brilliance; it is his insistence on responsibility.
Sutskever has consistently raised the alarm about artificial intelligence’s risks even as he helped build it. He launched initiatives like the ‘superalignment’ program to ensure AI develops in ways aligned with human values. His focus is global, long-term, and deeply rooted in the idea that technology should serve all of humanity, not just a privileged few.
Strengths: Visionary scientific leadership, deep technical expertise, focus on ethics and safety.
Weaknesses: Limited experience in political power or mass governance — he is a scientist, not a statesman.
The Politician: Donald Trump
Donald Trump is a businessman, media personality, and the 45th and 47th President of the United States of America. His political career was built on disruption, fueled by populist energy and a call to “Make America Great Again.” Trump’s influence is undeniable — he has reshaped U.S. politics, polarized public opinion, and left a global footprint.
Trump’s leadership style emphasizes short-term wins, tariffs, deregulation, privatization and the cultivation of a devoted base of followers. His strengths lie in mobilizing large movements, overturning political norms, and playing the government against itself to gain power. Yet his weaknesses are just as clear: division, authoritarian leanings, and a lack of sustained focus on long-term global challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, or the existential risks posed by advanced technologies.
Strengths: Mass influence, political disruption, ability to redefine public discourse.
Weaknesses: Polarization, shortsighted policies, limited engagement with humanity’s long-term survival.
Who Shapes a Golden Era?
A Golden Era for humanity will not emerge by accident. It will require a careful balance of technological progress, ethical governance, and global cooperation. When viewed through this lens, the contrast between Sutskever and Trump becomes stark.
Sutskever embodies foresight, responsibility, and global vision. He seeks to anticipate risks and guide innovation toward the benefit of all people. Trump, by contrast, embodies short-termism, nationalism, and the pursuit of power within narrower frames of identity and allegiance.
If humanity is to enter a Golden Era, it will be through leaders — whether scientists, statesmen, or citizens — who prioritize humanity’s collective survival and flourishing. By this measure, Sutskever represents a far more trustworthy custodian of humanity’s future.
Conclusion
In the end, the comparison between Ilya Sutskever and Donald Trump is more than a contest between two men. It is a mirror reflecting the choices before us. Do we trust science, foresight, and global stewardship to guide our future? Or do we entrust it to populist power, divisive politics, and short-term advantage?
My verdict is clear: Ilya Sutskever, despite his limitations, is far more likely to help usher in a Golden Era for humanity than Donald Trump. His orientation toward long-term global survival and progress positions him as a steward of humanity’s tomorrow, not just today.
And yet, this question is not just about Sutskever or Trump. It is about all of us. Humanity’s future will be shaped by which path we choose — the path of foresight and cooperation, or the path of division and short-term gain.
Which path do you choose? A Golden Age just for America or a Golden Age for the Whole World?
Aging Capriciously 
Oct 02, 2025 @ 18:23:17
I choose any path that trump is not the architect of, knowing that he has those behind him who are worse architects with plans still to be formulated or called out. If Trump should die; become even more mentally ill or be forced to resign. i hope the Democrats have good plans in place to deal with his backers and his replacement if the Great Experiment is to get back on course.
LikeLike
Oct 02, 2025 @ 21:09:48
Can he become any more mentally ill or deranged David? I would not bet n the Dems having any plans in place. They can seldom think beyond their noses. IMHO.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oct 03, 2025 @ 00:20:24
David, that is America’s problem, are the “Democrats” that much different to the Republicans?
Much of the so called western world’s claimed democracies are in fact two party systems. To be part of the electoral scene one has to be very rich or a party follower. This gives the people two options Buckleys or none.
We (the people) have made democracy into a dirty word, any likeness to true democracy, is at best accidental.
The one good thing about Trump, is the fact he has made this obvious and as a result the chance to correct the situation. The question now is will the people take up the challenge and correct the mistakes of the past. Reright Constitutions, curb the power of the political parties and change the rules regarding selection for and duration of high court appointments?
LikeLike
Oct 03, 2025 @ 03:21:59
Hopefully it will be people like llya Sutskever. Those who base knowledge on science, instead of here say, those who are experts in their field, those who discuss potential problems with a view to addressing them rather than destroying future progress. Always moving forwards never backwards. Communication and negotiation instead of self serving, dictatorship.
LikeLike
Oct 03, 2025 @ 07:20:29
I hope so Margaret. I could see if going both ways. The video was excellent and provides a sort of different perspective on where we are now. What did you think of it if you get a chance to watch it.
LikeLike
Oct 03, 2025 @ 15:00:36
The path of foresight and cooperation. However, in my current pessimistic state I find that difficult to imagine.
LikeLike
Oct 03, 2025 @ 17:28:38
The video is great for a different perspective. Try watching the video and see what you think after Wayne. I would like to know what you think of it. John
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oct 04, 2025 @ 15:24:48
I just watched the video and find it a little too ambitious (not sure if this is the right word) and based on spirituality. It presupposes we are spiritual beings and this will be our path to enlightenment. I find it difficult to follow or believe this argument as I find there is an element of our manifest destiny written somewhere and we are on a path built around our spiritual self and that somehow this will help to displace our human/physical reality and that somehow all our needs will be met without despoiling the earth.
There is simply too many of us inhabiting this world to coexist within the natural physical cycle of Nature and so without some catastrophic loss of life and a rewilding of the Earth I simply can’t see this happening. Also, for this Golden Age to come about it would appear we would have to lose a lot of our baser instincts and again I can’t see that happening as long as we are human?
I don’t believe in any greater spiritual beings and that we are on a journey to become a spiritual being ourselves.
LikeLike
Oct 04, 2025 @ 22:03:49
Wayne, I have to agree with you 100 percent but every so often I want to be a “wild eyed crazy as hell optimist” who thinks things are going to magically turn out for the better. And like in the old westerns or fairy tales, we will all live “Happily Ever After” regardless of where “ever after” is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oct 05, 2025 @ 04:16:29
As I sit here this morning looking out at the Fall colour and marveling at our warmer than average weather I could certainly embrace some optimism.
LikeLike
Oct 06, 2025 @ 20:36:29
John, I’ve posed questions here and other sites, making suggestions and asking, what are people going to do to correct the situation.
The response has been nil!!!! Slag Trump, slag the system, beat their gums, beat their their chests, but suggestions or action nothing!!!!
Trump will do whatever he likes and the people will look the other way, I can only say God bless America, because she needs it.
LikeLike
Oct 07, 2025 @ 05:10:40
I think too many people are being silent but many of us are speaking out and marching and rallying other people. I have attended two marches and one coming up on October 18th. Short of revolution, there is not much else we can do except to rally together to keep helping each other in these dark times. You can see that many people in the cities that trump is invading are also actively protesting his incursions and illegal actions. I have written more blogs excoriating trump and his supporters over the years than I can now county. The pen is mightier than the sword and many of us are trying to keep pressure up by writing and protesting publicly. Our voices mean that dissent is evident and public and that is a good thing. Not as powerful as we would like but the best that we can legally do in this country.
LikeLike
Oct 07, 2025 @ 12:27:53
John, because I am not physically there I cannot feel the vibes, but back in the 60’s I marched in protest to the Vietnam conscription and the air was alive with public discontent. Based on media reports I don’t get the idea that sort of feeling applies in America, I can only hope I am wrong. But keep on, keeping on, I like what you write, it makes me think.
LikeLike
Oct 07, 2025 @ 12:41:54
The air was more alive than because people were getting drafted. Once they eliminated the draft they eliminated a great deal of “motivation” to protest wars. No one likes getting their ass shot off. I am all in favor of the draft for the simple reason when peoples lives are at stake they think twice about the value of war. However, we are not taking about a shooting war YET, but in many ways we have a civil (accent on the word CIVIL) war going on in this country. Two sides that cannot talk to each other because in fact they have absolutely nothing in common or almost nothing in common. The road to where we are now started many years ago. Read my blog “The five thousand year road to Trump.” It is somewhat of an exaggeration but I do not think it is far off the mark. Can we reverse this trend? I can only put one foot at a time ahead of me and ponder whether we can. Many of my friends say “take care of yourself” this country is on its last legs.
LikeLike
Oct 07, 2025 @ 13:42:04
Your view on conscription is interesting, I’d never thought of it in that way.
Regarding America’s path to now, I agree totally, as I have alluded to in past comments, Reagan, Nixon and the Bushies all contributed to the now. What scares me is the fact that Trump and his administration seem to be tightening their grip on your country. I can only hope this malaise isn’t worldly infectious.
LikeLike
Oct 07, 2025 @ 18:04:45
I look to the world in some perhaps vain hope that they will be able to stop Trump because we seem unable to rein him in. He belongs in jail IMHO Jon.
LikeLike
Oct 12, 2025 @ 19:03:03
Who holds the future? God.
LikeLike
Nov 12, 2025 @ 12:03:20
I Think Donald Trump Is run a Occult child sex trafficking at Mar-a-Lago
LikeLike
Nov 24, 2025 @ 13:27:55
I Think Donald Trump Is a” Zoophilia
LikeLike
Nov 25, 2025 @ 07:50:52
No evidence of that yet, but I would not be surprised.
LikeLike
Nov 26, 2025 @ 23:17:23
I Think Donald Trump Is on the same level as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, Harvey Weinstein, Peter Nygård, Jimmy Savile, Diddy, Marilyn Manson, Jeffrey Epstein, Kevin Spacey, Matt Lauer, Bill Cosby, Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, R. Kelly, James Franco, David Copperfield,
LikeLike
Dec 12, 2025 @ 11:42:00
“Go MAGA, Go Broke”
LikeLike