Is the War on Drugs Real? — Drugs, Medicine and Pharmaceuticals

pills

Introduction:

Perhaps few subjects are more complex than the relationship between drugs and medicine.  While the word drug often denotes something “illegal”, medicine comes across with very benign connotations.  Drugs are bad for you.  Medicine is good for you.  However, what is the difference between a drug and a medicine?  Do you have to be sick before it is medicine?  Does everyone occasionally need medicine but no one ever needs drugs?  Why are some drugs legal and others illegal?  Why is it that some legal drugs are illegal unless we have a prescription?  In this blog, I will try to provide you some “divergent” views on drugs and medicines and the Pharmaceutical industry.

Pharmaceuticals:

First, we need to define the term pharmaceutical.  We can find the following definition online:

Adjective:  1.  relating to medicinal drugs, or their preparation, use, or sale.

Noun:  1. a compound manufactured for use as a medicinal drug.

It is important to understand the distinction between the medicinal use and the non-medicinal use of drugs.  Obviously, any drug can be used for either purpose.  However, the “moral” authorities which include the government, your neighbors, various religions and others who believe they have a right to dictate human behavior have used this distinction to decide when it is a crime to use drugs and when it is perfectly okay.  Thus, in many states I may now use marijuana but only if it is for a bona fide medicinal purpose.  If I want to simply use it like I use alcohol or caffeine or nicotine for recreational purposes, it is illegal and I will find myself in jail if I get caught.

three colors of pills

This distinction between drugs and medicine is further complicated by the fact that some drugs are simply considered “bad” drugs whether they have a medicinal use or not.  This category of “bad” drugs once included alcohol when (as many of you are aware) the 18th amendment to the US Constitution was passed to ban its legal use.  Prohibition was perhaps one of the most misguided episodes in American history.  However, it does have the unique distinction of being perhaps the only time in our history when a substance was banned strictly on moral terms.  The prohibition against alcohol was primarily based on the idea that drunkenness was a threat to the moral fiber of the nation.   Since then, our “War on Drugs” has been based on several reasons but morality is no longer a major reason.

Let’s get one thing clear from the start.  There is no “War on Drugs” in the USA.  If there were a war on drugs, then bars, cigarette shops, coffee shops, liquor stores, drug stores and doctors’ offices would be raided and closed.  Doctors, baristas, druggists and Pharmaceutical CEO’s would be arrested along with the rest of the drug pushers on the street.  We would need to build an entire prison system to house all the pharmaceutical executives, managers and workers who routinely make and sell drugs.

The “War on Drugs” is a sham, a myth and a hypocrisy of epic proportions.  There are two reasons for this so-called war.  The first is prejudice and the second is monetary.  These two reasons are curiously intertwined.

Docs and Big Pharma

Prejudice as a Factor in the Drug Wars:

Our prisons today are overflowing with people who have used or sold illegal street drugs.  Drugs like heroin, cocaine, marijuana and methamphetamines make up the bulk of illegal drugs sold on the street.  The majority of people selling these drugs are poor.  Minorities make up a disproportionate number of the poor in America.   Consider the following facts:

war on blacks

Poverty rates for blacks and Hispanics greatly exceed the national average. In 2014, 26.2 percent of blacks and 23.6 percent of Hispanics were poor, compared to 10.1 percent of non-Hispanic whites and 12 percent of Asians.National Poverty Center

Of course, if minorities are a large percentage of the poor and if the drug war is really an attack on the poor, then it should follow that minorities will make up a larger percentage of those convicted of drug crimes and sent to prison.  The facts support this:

  • African Americans now constitute nearly 1 million of the total 2.3 million incarcerated population
  • African American and Hispanics comprised 58% of all prisoners in 2008, even though African Americans and Hispanics make up approximately 25% of the US population
  • About 14 million Whites and 2.6 million African Americans report using an illicit drug
  • 5 times as many Whites are using drugs as African Americans, yet African Americans are sent to prison for drug offenses at 10 times the rate of Whites

The facts support that the so-called “War on Drugs” is really a war on the poor.  Why war on the poor?  Because they are regarded as a threat to the lifestyle of the wealthy.  The wealthy in America are of course predominately White.

2_war-on-drugs

“96.1 percent of the 1.2 million households in the top one percent by income were White, a total of about 1,150,000 households. In addition, these families were found to have a median net asset worth of $8.3 million dollars.”  — America’s Financial Divide: The Racial Breakdown of U.S. Wealth in Black and White, Huffington Post, 2015

It is seldom mentioned but wealthy people are fully aware of the fact that healthy non-drug addicted citizens make better workers.  Furthermore, non-drug addicted people who are addicted to hard work are less likely to break into your house in the middle of the night and steal your Gucci purse and your Rolex watch.

On the other hand, if you are poor and uneducated, drugs might seem like a decent way to spend a day rather than knocking on closed doors for a job.  I spent four years in the military from 1964 to 1968.   Any war is an ideal breeding ground for drug use.  Consider the daily effects of stress, confusion, attacks, wounds, death and uncertainty.  The military was rife with drugs when I was in.  Would anyone like to guess how much illegal drug use there was during the Vietnam War?

colors arrested more

“In 1971, a report by the House Select Committee on Crime revealed that from 1966 to 1969, the armed forces had used 225 million tablets of stimulants, mostly Dexedrine (dextroamphetamine), an amphetamine derivative that is nearly twice as strong as the Benzedrine used in the Second World War. The annual consumption of Dexedrine per person was 21.1 pills in the navy, 17.5 in the air force, and 13.8 in the army.”  — The Drugs That Built a Super Soldier, The Atlantic, 2016

 The above article concerns speed only and does not deal with marijuanaMy own personal experience was spending many weekends high on pot mixed with copious amount of whatever liquor we could get our hands on.  Beer would do if liquor was not available.  There were also many who simply sniffed glue and destroyed their brains.  To the best of my knowledge, I knew of no one who was ever busted for drug use on any base I was stationed at.  The moral is that it is okay to use drugs if they help you kill people but not simply to feel good about yourself.

The sanctimonious politicians who make drug laws in this country should be shot.  Am I being too “divergent” in my condemnation of these hypocrites?  Believe me, I could not be too hard on them.  Consider the damage that their greedy misguided policies have done to our nation and our citizens.  Millions of people have languished in jail only to serve their sentence and find that when they come out, they are even worse off than when they went in.

lead_large

Consider the effects of a felony record for drugs in America:  A convicted felon in Connecticut faces the following array of restrictions and constraints:

  1. Loses the right to become an elector and cannot vote, hold public office, or run for office, although he can have these rights restored
  2. Is disqualified from jury service for seven years, or while he is a defendant in a pending felony case (CGS § 51-217)
  3. Loses the ability to have firearms
  4. Could lose a professional license or permit,
  5. Employers can ask job applicants whether they have been convicted of a crime although federal anti-discrimination laws place some restrictions on the use of criminal histories.
  6. The State Board of Education (SBE) cannot issue or renew, and must revoke, a certificate, authorization, or permit to someone convicted of certain crimes. The SBE can also take one of these actions if the person is convicted of a crime of moral turpitude or of such a nature that the board feels that allowing the holder to have the credential would impair the credential’s standing.
  7. The Department of Children and Families must deny a license or approval for a foster family or prospective adoptive family if any member of the family’s household was convicted of a crime that falls within certain categories, which can include felonies.
  8. Landlords can evict a tenant who was convicted of a violation of federal, state, or local law that is detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of other residents. Federal and state law for public housing allows eviction based on conviction of certain felonies. Different rules apply to elderly people.
  9. Someone convicted under federal or state law of a crime involving possession or sale of a controlled substance is not eligible for federal assistance for higher education expenses for certain periods.
  10. State law bars anyone convicted of a drug possession or use felony under federal or state law from receiving benefits under the temporary assistance for needy families or food stamp programs unless the person (1) has completed his court imposed sentence, (2) is satisfactorily serving probation, or (3) completed or will complete a court imposed mandatory substance abuse treatment or testing program (CGS § 17b-112d).

You have served your sentence for possession of a marijuana joint.  You might have served between one and five years.  You are now ready to return to society and be a hard-working honest citizen.  Regard the above list!  No one will hire you. You cannot get a student loan.  You cannot get certain licenses and even some landlords will be legally able to not rent you a place to live.  What would you do?  What would Jesus do?  Well, unfortunately, many of these people are not you and they are not Jesus.  Thus, a life of crime on the street seems to offer more preferences for some than begging for money with a cup.  Besides, every business endeavor has certain risks and the gains from drug dealing may seem to far outweigh the risks, particularly when you consider the alternatives.

drug-war-cartoon

What Role Does Greed Play in the So-Called War on Drugs?

Pharmaceutical companies are huge and make huge profits.  They are consistently listed among the top most profitable companies in America.  Here are the top ten most profitable drug companies by market value:

  • Johnson & Johnson: $276 billion (market value)
  • Novartis: $273 billion
  • Roche: $248 billion
  • Pfizer: $212 billion
  • Merck: $164 billion
  • Sanofi: $134 billion
  • Bayer: $123 billion
  • Novo-Nordisk: $118 billion
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb: $115 billion
  • AbbVie: $110 billion

In 2016, the Pharmaceutical Industry was at the top of the list for most profitable industries.  Forbes, citing data from Factset, recently released its list of the 10 most profitable industries of 2016. “Pharma: Generic” led the way as the most profitable industry with a 30 percent net profit margin”

  1. Pharma: Generic: 30%
  2. Investment managers: 29.1 percent
  3. Tobacco: 27.2 percent
  4. Pharma: major: 25.5 percent
  5. Internet Software and Services: 25 percent
  6. Biotechnology: 24.6 percent
  7. Savings Banks: 24 percent
  8. IT Services: 23 percent
  9. Regional Banks: 23 percent
  10. Major Banks: 22.9 percent

https://www.surepayroll.com/resources/blog/the-10-most-profitable-industries#sthash.rVW6a7fs.dpuf

big-pharma-mafia

Please note where the tobacco industry is on this list.  Now ask yourself this question.  Do you think either big Pharma or Big Tobacco wants competition in the form of legalized drugs?  I hope you answered NO! to this question because there is ample evidence that both industries spend a great deal of money lobbying against drugs that would pose competition to their industries.

“Both pharmaceutical companies and alcohol brands are spending money to keep prohibition around, too.  As we reported last year, certain anti-cannabis academics are funded by big pharma.  Alcohol companies are also lobbying against legalization.  In one example, the California Beer & Beverage Distributors made campaign contributions to a committee dedicated to preventing marijuana legalization and taxation. 

 To summarize, police unions, prison guard unions, for-profit prisons, and drug and alcohol companies spend huge sums of money each year to keep cannabis illegal, and why?  Because it ensures job security and profits.”  — The Top 5 Industries Lobbying Against Cannabis Legalization Will Infuriate You by Sara Lilley in Leafly

Perhaps you are inclined to think that the prejudice and greed fueling the drug industry is not that bad.  Perhaps you do not mind that America has one of the highest rates of incarceration of any developed country.  Perhaps you do not mind that millions of your citizens are in jail for smoking or selling a joint.  Perhaps you are happy smoking and drinking and do not want any other drugs.  Maybe you feel that “Big Pharma” is on your side and helps you with all the new medicines they have coming down the pipeline.  If so, you are living in a fools’ paradise.  Big Pharma is more likely to steal from you and or kill you than the drug pusher on your street corner.  In fact, they do so every single day.

ethical-criteria-for-medicinal-drug-promotion-schedule-g-17-638

They steal from you with exorbitant profits.  Who do you think pays for all their advertising and research?  They actually spend more money on advertising than they do on research.

“Prescription drug companies aren’t putting a lot of resources toward new, groundbreaking medication, according to a recent report in BMJ, a medical journal based in London. Instead, it’s more profitable for them to simply to create a bunch of products that are only slightly different from drugs already on the market, the reports authors said.  The authors go on to say that for every dollar pharmaceutical companies spend on “basic research,” $19 goes toward promotion and marketing.” — Pharmaceutical Companies Spent 19 Times More On Self-Promotion Than Basic Research: by Alexander Eichler

Big Pharma also leads all industries in spending your money on lobbying.  From 1998 to 2016, they spent over 3.5 billion dollars on lobbying.  This was more than a billion dollars higher than for the next highest industry which was insurance.  — Top Industries.

ee545df3eb331cc722ed7088791e9a5eAre you still wondering why drug costs are so high? Did you really think it was all research and development costs?  The three major factors are:  Profits, lobbying and Marketing.  How much do you think these all add to the costs of your prescription drugs?

Well, perhaps you still do not care.  After all, if the drugs do their job, what do you care if they cost a lot.  Perhaps your insurance pays it all anyway.  Well friend, what if you knew some of these drugs were going to kill you?  Do you think I am exaggerating?

Here are some examples of potentially lethal side effects:

“Baycol, which lowers cholesterol, was strongly linked to a potentially fatal breakdown of muscle tissue.  Approved in 1997, it was voluntarily withdrawn four years later.  The anti-inflammatory drug Duract spent just one year on the market. Approved as a strictly short-term use product, the FDA found serious liver problems with people taking the drug for longer than what was recommended.

In 1985, employees of two drug companies were fined and/or sentenced to community service for not reporting adverse events involving the blood pressure drug Selacryn and arthritis drug Oraflex.” — Drug Side Effects Explained

Of course, drug companies do not want to kill you because that could result in costly litigation and even worse, bad publicity.  Thus, most drugs come with a lengthy disclaimer and long list of potential side effects.  These are more designed to protect the drug company than you or your health.  You will probably not be able to read the small print on the label and even if you are able, you will probably not have a clue what they are talking about.  On the odd chance that you do know what it all means, it would not matter anyway, since what is your recourse?  If you are in pain and have gone through the process of obtaining your prescription how likely are you to decide that you will not take the risks associated with the drug?  But, and here is the important “but”, all drugs, even over the counter drugs have potential side effects.

viagra

And this brings us to another major factor affecting the cost of drugs.  This is the cost for Big Pharma to cover its butt when caught doing something wrong.  A report by Pubic Citizen noted the following information:

In December 2010, Public Citizen published a report that, for the first time, documented all major financial settlements and court judgments between pharmaceutical manufacturers and the federal and state governments since 1991.  At the time of the report’s publication, almost $20 billion had been paid out by the pharmaceutical industry to settle allegations of numerous violations, including illegal, off-label marketing and the deliberate overcharging of taxpayer-funded health programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid.  Three-fourths of the settlements and accompanying financial penalties had occurred in just the five-year period prior to 2010.  At the time of the report’s publication, there was no indication that this upward trend was subsiding.

adhdThere are many other egregious practices that go on in Big Pharma and which are beyond the scope of this blog.  My point in writing this was first to help alert you to the hypocrisy of the so-called drug wars and second to bring to your attention the inordinate amount of effort and money that Big Pharma spends in trying to get you to buy their drugs.  If you watch TV or read any mainstream magazines, you cannot help but become inundated with ads for drugs to cure any problem you can think of.

larrythecableguyprilosecThe drug companies are the biggest pushers of drugs in the world today and all for a profit.  The fact that these drugs may help your condition is very secondary to Big Pharma’s primary goal which is profits.  The fact that many drugs should not be taken long-term and may have life threatening side effects is also not particularly important to the drug industry.  Between the ignorance of many medical doctors anxious to provide a fast treatment and the greed of the drug industry, you had best become a very informed and cautious consumer of any drugs you are going to take.  You should also be skeptical of any information provided by the drug industry.

Time for Questions:

What medications do you take?  Why?  What has been your history with drugs?  How informative has the drug information you have received been?  What do you think about all the drug advertising on TV and in magazines?  Do you think we live in an addicted society? Do you think the Drug War is real?

Life is just beginning.

 “People use drugs, legal and illegal, because their lives are intolerably painful or dull. They hate their work and find no rest in their leisure. They are estranged from their families and their neighbors. It should tell us something that in healthy societies drug use is celebrative, convivial, and occasional, whereas among us it is lonely, shameful, and addictive. We need drugs, apparently, because we have lost each other.”  ― Wendell BerryThe Art of the Commonplace: The Agrarian Essays

 

 

 

 

 

How much Pain is Caused by Aging Versus Laziness and Ignorance?

lazy_workout

Have you ever head the saying “no pain, no gain?”  This is one of the most idiotic pieces of advice ever given.  Pain is a signal that our body wants us to stop something or that it needs help.  I have little doubt that many people have been severely damaged by this so-called piece of wisdom.  However, taken to the other extreme, we see people who are so afraid of hard work and exercise that they have become couch potatoes.  I believe that many Americans have veered so far off the trail of pain that they have gone to the other extreme.  Look around you and what do you see?  Fat people everywhere you look.  We have an epidemic of obesity in America.  Regard the following facts: (From the Center for Disease Control)

  • The prevalence of obesity was 36.5% (crude estimate) among U.S. adults during 2011–2014.
  • The prevalence of obesity among U.S. youth was 17.0% in 2011–2014.
  • From 1999 through 2014, obesity prevalence increased among adults and youth.

The above data pertain to the frequency of obesity in the USA.  Keep in mind that there are many more people who are overweight than there are who are obese.  Obesity is defined as: “Excess amount of body fat with a BMI of over 30.”  Overweight is defined as: “Having more body weight than is considered normal or healthy for one’s age or build.”  If we were to include the amount of people who were both overweight as well as obese, the figures for “fat” people in the USA would skyrocket.

Several years ago, I attended a World Future Conference.  The former founder and CEO of Medtronic was one of the keynote speakers. His talk was on the topic of rising health care costs.  Many people focus on only one or two causes for the escalation of health care costs.  However, Earl Bakken presented a pie chart which showed several reasons for the rise.  These included:

  • Increased cost of technology
  • People living longer
  • Increased percentage of older people in the population
  • Litigation
  • Inflation
  • Lifestyle choices

obesity-is-preventable_52fc767facaae_w1500

Earl noted that all of these issues have had an impact on health costs.  You will notice that the last issue in his list included “lifestyle choices.”  This category includes such problems as diet, smoking, obesity, drugs, alcoholism, lack of exercise and poor health choices.  Contrary to what many people think, this issue was not the major cause of health care cost increases.  Nevertheless, the category is one of the factors linked to the increase in health care costs.

Looking only at obesity as a contributor to health care costs, we note the following facts: (From the Health Care Costs of Obesity)

  • Obesity is one of the biggest drivers of preventable chronic diseases and healthcare costs in the United States. Currently, estimates for these costs range from $147 billion to nearly $210 billion per year. In addition, obesity is associated with job absenteeism, costing approximately $4.3 billion annually and with lower productivity while at work, costing employers $506 per obese worker per year.  As a person’s, BMI increases, so do the number of sick days, medical claims and healthcare costs.
  •  Obese adults spend 42 percent more on direct healthcare costs than adults who are a healthy weight.
  •  Per capita healthcare costs for severely or morbidly obese adults (BMI >40) are 81 percent higher than for healthy weight adults. In 2000, around $11 billion was spent on medical expenditures for morbidly obese U.S. adults.
  •  Moderately obese (BMI between 30 and 35) individuals are more than twice as likely as healthy weight individuals to be prescribed prescription pharmaceuticals to manage medical conditions.
  •  Costs for patients presenting at emergency rooms with chest pains are 41 percent higher for severely obese patients, 28 percent higher for obese patients and 22 percent higher for overweight patients than for healthy- weight patients.

 People who are obese, compared to those with a normal or healthy weight, are at an increased risk for many serious diseases and health conditions, including the following: (From the Center for Disease Control and Prevention)

  • All-causes of death (mortality)
  • High blood pressure (Hypertension)
  • High LDL cholesterol, low HDL cholesterol, or high levels of triglycerides (Dyslipidemia)
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Coronary heart disease
  • Stroke
  • Gallbladder disease
  • Osteoarthritis (a breakdown of cartilage and bone within a joint)
  • Sleep apnea and breathing problems
  • Some cancers (endometrial, breast, colon, kidney, gallbladder, and liver)
  • Low quality of life
  • Mental illness such as clinical depression, anxiety, and other mental disorders
  • Body pain and difficulty with physical functioning

Please notice that the CDC list does not explicitly include hip, knee and back problems.  Of course, many people who are not overweight suffer from these problems, but there is considerable evidence that obesity contributes to these problems.  People who are obese often lack muscle tissue and ligament flexibility which help support their knees, backs and hips.  The less exercise they get, the more the problem is exacerbated.  They may go to doctors and chiropractors to get help but the underlying cause of obesity is seldom treated.  Finally, surgery is performed when exercise, diet and physical therapy could be more effective treatments.  So why do so many people get surgery or pills when there are cheaper and more effective treatments with less side effects?

Let’s go back to what I said in the title of this blog.  Laziness and Ignorance.

too lazy to exercise

Laziness and Ignorance:

Every year, it is a well-known fact at health clubs across the country that right after New Year’s Day, the membership will increase dramatically and the parking lot will fill up with new members. This phenomenon will last about 15 weeks after which the new members will slowly drop off and the parking lot will go back to normal.  Why do you think this happens?  I will give you two reasons:

First:  The assumption that they will get instant results.  Too many people read the magazines at the grocery store promising “Six Weeks to Abs of Steel” or “Lose 40 lbs. in Eight Weeks.”  I would argue that if you can lose 1 lb. in a month, you are doing a great job.  As for the abs of steel, first you will need to lose a large amount of body fat and second, it may take you a year of hard dedicated disciplined ab exercises.  As someone who does regular ab exercises, they hurt.  They are no fun.

20170406_155206There is a difference between pain and hurt.  When I tried to continue my ab exercises after my prostate surgery and then after my hernia surgery, I experienced pain.  I wanted to get back into shape too quickly both times.  I stopped the exercises and worked on other routines that did not cause pain.  Mind you, the ab exercises still hurt and I have been doing them for six years.  I am making a big distinction here between pain and hurt. Perhaps, I should say they “burn.”  Burn is the athletic euphemism for hurt.  Most people don’t like hurt.  However, if you expect that you can get in shape without some discomfort, you are destined for life as a couch potato or in a surgery ward.

Second:  People are ignorant when it comes to exercise.  How many Americans do you think have ever read a book on exercise?  Unless, you are willing to become a student of exercise or trust in an athletic trainer, the knowledge that most people have regarding exercise is insufficient for them to attain the results they seek.  Sadly, most medical practitioners are just as ignorant when it comes to the role of exercise and diet in a healthy lifestyle.

How many exercise books do you think make Amazon’s “best seller” list.  To determine this, I went to Amazon and pulled up their top 100 best sellers.   In the entire list, there was not one book on exercise protocols.  There were two books on dieting at number 41 and number 42 in the top 100 list.  You could find several books on menus and cooking.  It is much easier in the USA to eat, then it is too exercise.

kaelinAmericans are enamored with diets and each new diet best seller promises fantastic results in a short amount of time.  The Amazon number 1 best seller in the health and exercise category was a book titled “Big Fat Lies.”  The author promises you the “truths” that helped her to lose 65 lbs. “without giving up pizza or ice cream.”  The author is Kaelin Tuell Poulin and the book has a very high rating in the customer reviews section.  Ninety-eight percent of the 235 reviewers gave it a 5-star rating.  However, while I often put a great deal of store in ratings, you must be careful about inflated ratings.  The one negative rater had this to say about the book: (typos in the review were not changed)

“Dont be fooled into purchasing a book that was reviewed by 200 hundred women who never read the book (her followees) I have read the book it is subpar at best and not worth the money. My origional review included picture evidence of her asking for reviews but it was removed because it included her identity i suppose. I hope this one stays up so no one else is fooled into buying this. I give this book 1 star only to post. She is a salesperson and she is a great one at that! but if one person reads this and doesnt feed into the hype it was worth the time and effort to type it.”

I would not call the above review a particularly good piece of criticism.  However, the author does alert us to the possibility that the book suffers from a sort of follower worship.  Nevertheless, I would risk the small cost of the book if I were looking for a diet program.  Consider the following review from one of Kaelin’s “ladyBoss” more ardent followers:

“This program has TWO things that every other weight loss program out there is missing.  For ONE Kaelin was heavy once she was 185 pounds herself but with hard work and dedication lost the weight and has kept it off for 5 years.”

This is a great testimonial.  I am not sure if “every other weight program is missing” these two factors, but I am sure that dedication and hard work were necessary for Kaelin to keep the weight off for five years.  One problem with many exercise and diet programs is that the participant is naive and believes that once they lose the weight, their hard work is over.  They may also lack the discipline to continue the work once a certain goal is achieved.  Lack of discipline?  Laziness?  Ignorance? This is a volatile mix.  They seem to go together like salt and pepper.

WWS-Obesity

There is one final factor that we must discuss and that studies have shown have a direct bearing on obesity and poor health.  This is the factor of poverty.  Many studies have shown a direct relationship between income and obesity and between income and exercise.  Poor people get less exercise and generally have poorer nutrition.  There are several explanations for this.  We can posit some possible cause and effect relationships:

  1. Lack of education leads to obesity
  2. Poverty leads to high fat diet and poor nutrition
  3. Lack of education leads to poverty
  4. Poverty leads to low exercise priorities

You might notice that there is a kind of circularity to the above relationships.  Perhaps, if they are circular it does not matter which is cause and which is effect since the result is the same.  The outcomes for poor people are poor nutrition, lack of exercise and obesity.

There are some who dispute the above correlations.  The claim is made that the relationship between poverty and obesity is not linear but varies by age, gender and ethnicity.  It has also been pointed out that rich countries throughout the world have a higher incidence of obesity than poor countries.

“While all segments of the U.S. population are affected by obesity, one of the common myths that exists is that all or virtually all low-income people are far more likely to be obese. In this generalization, two facts commonly are overlooked(1) the relationship between income and weight can vary by gender, race-ethnicity, or age and (2) disparities by income have been weakening with time, particularly for adults.” — Relationship Between Poverty and Obesity, Food Research and Action Center

However, if we look at obesity from an aggregate point of view and disregard the effects of ethnicity, age and gender, we find the following evidence to show a linkage between poverty and obesity:

“Poverty rates and obesity were reviewed across 3,139 counties in the U.S.  In contrast to international trends, people in America who live in the most poverty-dense counties are those most prone to obesity.  Counties with poverty rates of >35% have obesity rates 145% greater than wealthy counties.”Poverty and Obesity by James Levine (2011)

Furthermore, even the Food Research and Action Center admits to the problem that obesity poses for America and state on their site that:

“While all segments of the U.S. population can be affected by poor dietary intake and obesity, low-income and food insecure people are especially vulnerable due to the additional risk factors associated with inadequate resources and under-resourced communities.” 

Note the above statement that “poor people” are especially vulnerable.  Let me tell you the following story that illustrates some of my admittedly selective experience with this issue of poverty and obesity.

One day, Karen and I went to Scottsdale Arizona to visit and do some shopping.  We went to several art galleries and jewelry stores.  When it was time for lunch, we found an authentic looking Mexican restaurant and decided to eat outside.  We were right in the heart of Scottsdale and many people kept walking by our table.  It was fun people watching, but something kept nagging at my mind.  I was not sure why, but there was a difference between the average people I was used to seeing and the people I saw in Scottsdale.

Suddenly, I realized what was bothering me.  In the hour or so that we were eating, we did not see one obese or even moderately overweight person walk by.  All the people that passed by us were healthy and athletic looking.  This was my first realization of the connection between wealth and obesity.  I don’t know about the rest of the world but ever since then, I have observed that most overweight people I see in America are either poor or middle class.  In my opinion, rich people have much lower incidences of obesity in this country.

Aging and Pain:

You will notice that I have not attributed pain to aging.  This is not an oversight.  Neither is it denial.  You can have pain when you are young and you can have pain when you are old.  In either case, there is no way you should just accept the pain.  Unfortunately, what medical practitioners often diagnose and treat with young people, they are willing to accept with old people.  Let me give you another personal example.

20170406_155432Two years ago, I started developing a pain in my right shoulder. I was not sure where it came from but after several months of it getting worse, I went to see an orthopedic doctor.  He asked what if anything I might be doing to aggravate the shoulder.  I mentioned that I swim frequently and am aggressive with my laps.  His simple answer was “Well then, stop swimming.”  I decided to follow his advice and for the next year, I stopped swimming.  However, my shoulder pain did not get any better.

A year later, I went to see another orthopedic doctor and he could not find anything wrong with my shoulder.  He did no MRIs or X-ray’s.  I suggested he give me an injection of cortisone, which he did.  I had moderate pain relief for about six weeks and then the pain resumed and continued to get worse.  At this point, I decided to do some of my own research into shoulder pain.  This research was very productive.

I found some very good descriptions of the exact type of pain I was incurring and a few different suggestions on how I could treat the pain without pills or surgery.  The best and most positive ideas I found came from a Doctor John M. Kirsch in Wisconsin.  Dr. Kirsch put his ideas and supporting evidence for his theory of what causes some types of shoulder pain into a small book titled “Shoulder Pain:  The Solution and Prevention.”  I have since been following his treatment regimen with good results.  My shoulder pain has been decreasing and the range of motion in my right shoulder is improving.

I mentioned earlier that I am 70 years old.  I think that there is too often the attitude among people my age and the doctors they see that “pain with aging is inevitable.”  If it is inevitable, then we should just “suck it up” and live with it.  Sometimes, this might be true.  However, the assumption that aging and pain need to go together is a prescription that does not serve any of the elderly very well.  I have talked to many older people and I often find the same set of attitudes either on their part or their doctors.  It is basically “Well, getting old is a bitch and you just have to live with pain.”

No, you do not have to live with pain!   

I have been running 4 or 5 times a week for over 40 years now.  During this time, I have had shin sprints, knee pain, hip pain, big toe pain, back pain, Morton’s neuroma, plantar fasciitis, sesamoiditis, corns, calluses and blisters.  Each time the pain came, I have gone through the following sequence of activities:

  1. Awareness of discomfort
  2. Try to ignore it
  3. Discomfort moves into the pain stage
  4. Take over-the-counter meds
  5. Go to see a doctor
  6. Pain improved by prescription pills or shots
  7. Pain returned in a short while
  8. Do research on other remedies
  9. Trial and error with other remedies
  10. Voila, eventually find the right remedy (no surgery and no prescription drugs)
  11. Pain goes away and does not return
  12. Sometimes, continuous exercise such as leg stretches and yoga are necessary to keep conditions from returning or getting worse. g., must do calf stretches 3x per week to stop plantar fasciitis from returning.  

20170406_155233Some people are not so lucky.  However, I hesitate to call all of my good health “Luck.”  There is a saying by Thomas Jefferson that “The harder I work the luckier I get.”  I have worked hard to stay in shape.  I exercise regularly.  I watch what I eat.  I try to avoid excesses.  No doubt, I have had some luck that goes beyond hard work and discipline.  Nevertheless, I believe that hard work and discipline has played a large role in my ability to be healthy and still active at my age.

I wish I had a dollar for everyone that has come up to me and said “I wish I could run but I have bad knees.”   Many people do have bad knees.  But many people do not see a connection between their “bad” knees and their obesity.  Their cycle is more like this:

  1. Overeat
  2. Gain weight
  3. Do no exercise
  4. Get pain someplace
  5. Do less exercise
  6. Get more pain
  7. Go to doctor
  8. Get knee or hip or some other surgery
  9. Continue being overweight and doing little or no exercise
  10. Take pills

4 weeks to a healthier

The only way the above activities relate to aging is that it takes some time to destroy your body through lack of exercise and poor diet.  I guarantee you though, it will happen eventually depending on how much you abuse your body.  It may happen when you are young or it may happen when you are old.  The longer you wait to do something about it, the more difficult it will be to repair the damage you have done.  It seems like my body takes more time to repair itself the older I get.

Finally, you do not have to be rich to have good health.  Money will not bring you good health if you abuse your body, overeat, drink too much, smoke too much and avoid exercise.  You can pay all the doctors in the world and you will still have bad health if you follow the 10 steps listed above.

Time for Questions:

Do you exercise regularly?  Why or why not?  Do you have a program to help keep track of your weight?  Why or why not?  Do you have a weight problem?  What do you do about it?  How effective have your efforts been?  What do you think would help them be more effective?

Life is just beginning.

“My mother was a P.E. teacher, and she was kind of a fanatic about fitness and nutrition growing up, so it was ingrained in me at a young age.  As I get older, I’m finding out it’s not about getting all buffed up and looking good.  It’s more about staying healthy and flexible.” — Josh Duhamel
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is Chiropractic an Art or a Science? 

When I grew up on the East Coast, I had little or no contact with chiropractors.  Back then, most people I knew and most medical centers did not regard them as real medical practitioners.  Years later, after I came out to the Mid-West, I found a much wider acceptance of chiropractors.  Over the past 40 years of living in Minnesota and Wisconsin, I have known many people who have gone to chiropractors and who firmly believe that they were being helped.  Most of the people I have known were suffering from back problems.  Here is one comment regarding chiropractors from an obviously very satisfied patient:

“I go to a chiropractor irregularly, usually when my neck is bothering me.  He uses heat, ultrasound, and massage therapy to undo the tension in my back and neck, caused by two vertebrae in my back that have been out of alignment since I was 16.  I go away, and am usually good for another 6 months.

I’ve never had a chiropractor offer to cure anything, from gallstones to depression by cracking my back; I’ve never had one suggest I needed to try any homeopathic remedies; I’ve never had one claim my bipolar disorder was all due to a misaligned spine. When I did have gall bladder trouble, my then chiropractor told me to see my primary care doctor post-haste.”

reno-chiropractor-940x627

If chiropractic medicine has any single claim to fame it is in dealing with back and skeletal muscle problems.  Chiropractors are famous for treating such problems with spinal manipulation and “adjustments.”  Often the diagnosis given to the patient will include the claim that the patient has a “pinched” nerve or some type of “subluxation”.  The patient spends an hour or so with the doctor getting an adjustment to treat the problem.  Many patients will then leave feeling much better then when they arrived.  They will also be out between 65 to 200 dollars per visit.  In most states, Chiropractic medicine is recognized and eligible for insurance reimbursement.

“Medicare does cover medically necessary chiropractic services.  According to the CMS,  Medicare Part B now covers 80% of the cost for ‘manipulation of the spine if medically necessary to correct a subluxation.’  There is no cap on the number of medically necessary visits to a chiropractor.”  — Does Medicare Cover Acupuncture or Chiropractic?, Senior 65

OK, so far, we have happy patients, insurance reimbursement in most states and Medicare coverage for chiropractic service, so what is my problem with chiropractors?  What if it is an art, what’s wrong with that?  Well, an art is something that as opposed to a science does not have objective reproducibility.  There is little or no evidence for cause and effect in an artistic relationship.  From an art, we would expect a much wider variation of results then we would get from something that has demonstrated scientific reproducibility.

“Chiropractic theory and practice are not based on the body of knowledge related to health, disease, and health care that has been widely accepted by the scientific community.

 Most chiropractors believe that spinal problems, which they call “subluxations,” cause ill health and that fixing them by “adjusting” the spine will promote and restore health. The extent of this belief varies from chiropractor to chiropractor. Some believe that subluxations are the primary cause of ill health; others consider them an underlying cause.” —- Twenty Things Most Chiropractors Won’t Tell You  by Dr. Preston H. Long

Another way of looking at the difference between and an art and a science lies in the ability to assign risk factors.  With a science, we should be able to assign a probably of risk in terms of outcomes.  With an art, we cannot reliably assign risk factors since they have no bearing in empirical outcomes.  What difference does this make to a potential chiropractic patient?  It should make a great difference since their chances of getting an accurate diagnosis for many potential problems is much less with chiropractic medicine than with traditional medicine.  Here are two comments from people who have gone to chiropractors.  These comments are from the http://www.spine-health.com forum and website.  The subject was: “Does chiropractic treatment help with pinched nerves:”

“Chiropractic “medicine” deals with the musculoskeletal system. However, many chiropractic offices use TENS therapy, which stimulates the nerves. Most of my back problems come from nerve issues and I have personally never found relief from chiropractic, in fact, it made me worse. But this is only my personal experience. My portable TENS unit helps me; I would ask the doctor who is managing your condition if TENS therapy may be right for you. Good luck!”

“In my case, I made the biggest mistake in my life, I was complaining about little pain in my knee but my chiropractor damaged my upper back T5 and T6 which I’m suffering now with a lot of symptoms nerve pain in between my shoulder, legs , arms , headache ….., I’ll never advise anybody to go to the chiropractor , and this is my own  experience.”

Anecdotes and grievances do not prove a case against chiropractic.  However neither do testimonials from satisfied patients prove the efficacy of chiropractic treatment.  It can be argued that the placebo effect will explain much of chiropractic’s reported success.  I have often argued that massage therapy will produce the same results with lower cost.  Some evidence exists to support my contention.

“A study called Patterns and Perceptions of Care for Treatment of Back and Neck Pain appeared in 2003. The studied questioned over 2,000 people on how they dealt with their aches and pains. Massage took home the gold with people preferring it to chiropractic for any kind of back pain or general body pain, but chiropractic led the race in upper-back pain and neck pain. Even with these results, visits to chiropractors were much more common than visits to massage therapists.”  — Chiropractor Vs. Massage

The above study notes that more people go to chiropractors than massage therapists.  You might wonder why?  Especially since seeing a massage therapist will cost you about 1/2 to 1/3 the cost of seeing a chiropractor.  I propose that the reasons for this propensity of people to prefer chiropractors to massage therapists lies in the more successful lobbying and marketing that chiropractors have done.  A second and related reason is that massage therapy will generally not be covered by most insurance plans or Medicare.  The following applies to Medicare coverage for massage reimbursement:

“Original Medicare does not cover massage therapy. Services that are not covered by Medicare are the sole responsibility of the patient.  In some cases, Medicare Part B will cover chiropractic services if they are medically necessary and are meant to correct a subluxation of the spine. In most cases, Original Medicare pays 80% of the cost for this treatment, but the patient is responsible for the other 20% and all other tests and services performed by the chiropractor.” —  Does Medicare Cover Massage Therapy?

Note that in the above description that chiropractic care is covered but massage therapy is not.  The lobby for chiropractors is much more powerful than the lobby for massage therapists.  This latter fact demonstrates that the type of medical care and medical coverage you are eligible for will be determined not by objective scientific facts but by political persuasion and money spent by lobbyists.  How does that make you feel?  But let’s get back to chiropractic treatments and look more specifically at “adjustments”.  This is the bread and butter treatment for chiropractic patients.  Do you need them?  Will they help you?

Chiropractic Adjustments:

chiro with an adjustmentIf homo sapiens have a weak link in their skeletal structure it is the back.  It has been argued that the problem arose when we switched from hanging in trees to walking upright.  Whatever the cause, back problems are easily the most common and perhaps one of the most painful problems faced by Americans today.  I have heard it said that the “opioid epidemic” is really a “pain epidemic” as more people age and have to deal with back problems, knee problems and hip problems.  No one beset by continuous pain can be blamed for wanting to find an escape from that pain.  However, as I noted in the previous blog, this desire to escape pain often leads to bad choices.  Surgery is too often prescribed when other treatment modalities would be more effective with less side effects.  This brings us to the issue of chiropractic adjustments for back pain.  How effective are they?  Here is another comment from Dr. Preston H. Long regarding the effectiveness of spinal manipulation:

“Research studies that look at spinal manipulation are generally done under strict protocols that protect patients from harm. The results reflect what happens when manipulation is done on patients who are appropriately screened—usually by medical teams that exclude people with conditions that would make manipulation dangerous. The results do not reflect what typically happens when patients select chiropractors on their own. The chiropractic marketplace is a mess because most chiropractors ignore research findings and subject their patients to procedures that are unnecessary and/or senseless.”Chiropractic Abuse: An Insider’s Lament Paperback – 8 Oct 2013, by  PhD. Preston H Long D.C

abuse

I highly recommend you read the book by Dr. Long.  If you are going to go to a chiropractor, you should have a realistic assessment of finding out your chances of getting help and relief.  Too many people leave their medical treatment entirely in the hands of so-called experts.  This is a big mistake.  I will discuss this later in another blog, but you need to be a strong advocate for your health care and not trust any one medical practitioner too much.  How much is too much?

  • It is too much if you are uninformed and have done little or no research into the causes and treatments of your illness.
  • It is too much if you expect that your treatment will take the place of discipline and hard work on your part.
  •  It is too much if you would rather get surgery than lose weight or exercise.
  •  It is too much if you expect that your doctor will advise you to pursue less invasive treatments before surgery or pills.
  •  It is too much if your doctor is overweight, has no exercise program of his/her own or smokes.
  •  It is too much if you have not pursued a second or third opinion.
  •  It is too much if your doctor cannot show you fairly persuasive evidence of a diagnosis and an empirically related treatment modality.

Conclusions:

For the record, I have no vendetta or grudge against chiropractors.  However, it has been my observation that they often treat many problems that they are not competent to treat or that have not had a proper diagnosis.  I have seen too many friends go to a chiropractor and not have a long-term fix to their pain or problem.  Chiropractors may offer a good short term fix to some pain problems but usually no long-term fix.  For the record though, massage, surgery and pills do not usually provide a long-term fix and with surgery, there will usually be consequences that the patient was probably not aware of.

(For more facts on the pro’s and con’s of chiropractic treatment see “Evidence for Chiropractic Treatment“) 

Chiropractors are no better than regular medical doctors when it comes to dealing with the underlying cause of pain.  Sadly, some of the problem for hasty diagnosis must be laid on the patient’s doorstep.  Many pain sufferers want either instant relief or relief that will entail little or no effort on their part.  Doctors too readily give into this desire either because of the financial remuneration that awaits them for treatment or laziness or perhaps simple ignorance.  My skeptical side says that giving a patient an exercise program or diet program is not nearly as lucrative as treating the patient with adjustments or surgery.  Back surgery will generally cost between 50k and 100k.  Spinal adjustments may take place for up to 6 months and final costs may total nearly $5000 dollars (computed as 50 treatments multiplied by an average cost of $65 dollars per treatment.)

On the positive side, there are many chiropractors who offer an alternative to the pills and surgeries so often recommended by mainstream medical doctors.  Perhaps because they have been viewed as less professional by traditional medicine, many chiropractors have considered a variety of non-traditional treatment options.  Many of these treatments are not very scientific or have no proven scientific effectiveness but this does not mean that they may not be effective.  Scientific proof has often taken many years to prove things that traditional folk medicine long knew was true.  However, there is a drawback in delaying some treatments to pursue unscientific remedies.  For instance, when I was diagnosed with prostate cancer, I decided to pursue a “wait and see” or “active surveillance” policy.  I was not ready to accept either the PSA reading or the biopsy or even the MRI results.

During my wait and see time, I opted to try some herbal remedies that were reported to have some success with prostate cancer.  I started taking several of these remedies each day in the hopes that a future biopsy would show a decrease in cancer cells or even the disappearance of my cancer.  No luck.  My next biopsy and a third biopsy all showed increases.  In addition, my Gleason score and PSA scores kept going up.  I now risked the danger that the cancer would spread out of my prostate and migrate to other organs.  It was time for surgery.  Not to pursue surgery at this point would have been foolish and even hopeless.

Thus, there is an ever-present danger that pursuing treatment programs that are a dead end might endanger your life and prevent you from going down more fruitful paths.  There is a reason that many people pursue such options.  It is called “hopefulness.”  I cannot blame anyone for this outlook.  I too was hopeful that I could keep my prostate and continue to pursue a normal life.  Many people go to chiropractors rather than medical doctors in the hope that they will find a cure beyond pills and surgeries.  Some do and some don’t.

Time for Questions:

Have you ever been to a chiropractor?  Why or why not?  Did you find them helpful?  Why?  What evidence did your doctor provide to show why he/she gave you the diagnosis you received?  What kind of exercise program do you follow?  Do you think people without an exercise program are higher risks for medical problems and pain?

Life is just beginning.

“The doctor of the future will give no medicine, but will interest his patients in the care of the human frame, in diet and in the cause and prevention of disease.” – Thomas A. Edison

 

 

 

 

 

 

%d bloggers like this: