John’s Top Ten Almost Forgotten Great Movies – Part 2

30 Jan 2024 2 Comments

by Dr. John Persico Jr. in Uncategorized Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

John’s Top Ten Almost Forgotten Great Movies – Part 2

Here we are folks.  My Final Five in my list of “Top Ten Almost Forgotten Great Movies.”  As I did last week, I will briefly describe each movie and also explain what it was that appealed to me about the movie.  Why am I listing it as a “Great Movie?” Why do I think you would not be wasting an evening to watch this movie on Hulu or Amazon Prime or Netflix or perhaps find it on YouTube?  Even if you have seen these movies, any of them are well worth watching two or three times.  IMHO.

executive-suite-use-lakjdfklajs-e1632191516317

  1. Executive Suite – 1954

It is the early 50’s.  Some people would call this the era of “Happy Days” in America.  We were the kings of the world.  Europe, Asia, Russia were still recovering from the ravages of WW II. Africa was a developing country, and we were exploiting South America and the Mideast to get the oil and resources needed for our factories.  Our American economy dominated the world.  Everything was bought and sold in the USA except some cheap Japanese goods.

Deming was working with Japan under Mc Arthur to help them rebuild their economy.  He promised them that if they followed his methods of Quality and Statistical Process Control (SPC), they would come to dominate the world market in ten years.  Ten years was still far away by American standards.  Profit and mass production ruled the psyches of almost every major CEO in the USA.  Underneath the soft underbelly of our production-oriented economy was a split that was opening up that would destroy business as we knew it.  It was a split that Deming was aware of and tried to warn us about, but he was regarded as an old fogey who was behind the time.

This split was a battle between Quality and Quantity.  It involved a choice between getting it right or just getting it out the door as cheaply as possible.  Deming told companies that they could have mass production and also quality by using Statistical Process Control.  They laughed at him and as they tossed him out their doors, they told him

“That’s impossible.  You can’t have quality and quantity both as the same time.  We do not have time for SPC.  We only have time to make as many products as fast and as cheap as we can.  Our buyers are waiting for our products.” 

And that brings us to the “Executive Suite.”  The battle as seen by manufacturers between quality and quantity is the very plotline of the movie.  “Executive Suite” had what today would be known as an “ensemble cast.”  William Holden, Barbara Stanwyck, Frederic Marsh, June Alyson, Walter Pidgeon, Nina Foch, Shelley Winters, Dean Jagger, Tim Considine, Paul Douglas, and William Bouchey were just a few of the great actors that were in this movie.  The movie went on to be nominated for four Academy Awards at the 27th Academy Awards in 1955

The basic plot of Executive Suite is very simple.  The Tredway Corporation, once renowned for its fine products has fallen on hard times.  The CEO (Avery Bullard) has just died, and since he did not name a successor, his Board of Directors must elect a new CEO.  The company once known for its quality products has lost customers.  In his later years, Bullard had “Lost his way” in the words of his chief production engineer played by William Holden.

The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) played by Frederic March had helped the founder take the company down the road of cheap products to be mass produced.  William Holden described the Controller’s strategy as “fly specking” every penny to cut costs.  The battle for the CEO is waged in and out of the board room as prospective candidates try to enlist the aid of other board members for votes and proxy votes.  The actual battle comes down to quality or quantity.  This battle would play out in many board rooms across the USA from the fifties to the early eighties.  Who will win?

In real life America, cost cutting, and finance won out until the Japanese started “eating our lunch.”  By 1980, when NBC published its Special Report, “If Japan can why can’t we?”, thousands of US companies had lost market share to the emerging Japanese quality juggernaut.  I joined Process Management International in 1986 and met Dr. Deming at a seminar in San Francisco where I became one of his willing workers and acolytes.  Dr. Deming was sometimes called the “Father of Japanese Quality.”  The Deming Prize, (the highest award for quality in Japan) was named after Dr. Deming.  He was quite a thrill and inspiration to work with.

So, who or what will win out in this low-key but thrilling movie?  Watch it and see.

Cmw3mrxUsAA-wza

  1. Glengarry Glen Ross – 1992

The movie “Glengarry Glen Ross” was based on David Mamet’s 1984 Pulitzer Prize–winning play of the same name.  Mamet in my opinion is one of the greatest playwriters of all time.  He is also a filmmaker and author.     You will never go wrong watching a film based on his stories or plays.  They are always thought provoking and run against the grain of “action movies” and “shoot-em ups” that seem to dominate screens today.

Like “Executive Suite”, this movie also features an ensemble cast of some of the best Hollywood actors in history.  The cast includes:  Al Pacino, Jack Lemmon, Alec Baldwin, Alan Arkin, Ed Harris, Kevin Spacey, and Jonathan Pryce.  The film was a box office failure.  Nevertheless, many critics consider it one of the best movies of the 1990s.

Glengarry Glen Ross is about competition in the sales industry.  The setting is a real estate office.  The five salesmen are told by the sales manager Kevin Spacey, that a super salesman (Blake) from home office is coming down to “motivate” them.  Blake (Played by Alec Baldwin) rips the men apart in a no hold bars speech that questions their virility and masculinity.  He then tells them that only the top two closers will be kept on and the other men will be fired.  When challenged by the salesman Dave Moss (Played by Ed Harris) Blake says:

“And to answer your question, pal, why am I here?  I came here because Mitch and Murray asked me to.  They asked me for a favor.  I said the real favor, follow my advice and fire your fucking ass, because a loser is a loser!”

The dialogue in the film is often tough, raw, insulting, and difficult to listen to.  You feel sympathy for the men who must do anything to make a “close.”  “Closing” is making a sale.  If you have ever dealt with real estate salespeople, car salespeople or insurance salespeople, you know how tenuous their link to integrity can be.  In the “Ten Least Trusted Professions in America, three of the top ten include the professions I have noted above.  My experience with these three professions would certainly support their inclusion in the top ten.  The following comments in respect to the three professions noted are from Insider Monkey.

  1. Insurance Salesperson

“Insurance salespeople may face trust issues as they often demand potential hidden fees.  They are also blamed for misinterpretation of policies and tend to always prioritize their commissions. It is hence inevitable that such a behavior creates doubts about their transparency and customer-centric approach.”

  1. Used Car Salesperson

“Used car salespeople are distrusted due to their dishonesty, selling faulty vehicles, and pressure tactics. This creates skepticism about their integrity and the quality of their sales.  It is hence one of the least trusted professions in America.”

  1. Real Estate Agents

“Real estate agents are perceived to be responsible of potential conflicts of interest, commission-based motivations, and pressure to close deals quickly.  Some past instances of dishonest practices in the US have also contributed to this narrative of lack of trust.  Hence, it is one of the least trusted professions in America.”

The plot revolves around the efforts of the salespeople in this firm to obtain a set of leads which they hope will secure their jobs.  Politics, greed, and corruption become normal parts of their lives.  In a space of 24 hours, some of the men are willing to pull out all stops to keep their jobs.  The dialogue is hard rough edged street vernacular.  The men are victims of an exploitative capitalist system where getting a sale is more important than integrity.  A perfect reflection of art imitating life.  Every day we see examples of a system that rewards greed and perfidy and where lies and cheating are taken for granted.  You would probably not be surprised to find that Lawyers and Politicians are also in the top ten least trusted professions in America.  Ask yourself “What are they selling?”

national-ww2-museum-carmen-jones-film-screening

  1. Carmen Jones – 1954

This movie was a combination drama, romance and musical.  It was an Americanized remake of the Opera Carmen by George Bizet.  It had an all-Black cast that included some of the great African American actors and singers of the day.  Dorothy Dandridge, Harry Belafonte, Olga James, Pearl Bailey, Joe Adams, Diahann Carroll, Roy Glenn, and Brock Peters.  Some of the Tenor and Bass lyrics were dubbed in by African American singers like Marvin Hayes and LeVern Hutcherson.  Some of the Soprano lyrics were dubbed in by the wonderful Marilyn Horne who was White.

The screenplay by Harry Kleiner is based on the English lyrics and book by Oscar Hammerstein II, from the 1943 stage musical of the same name.  The original score from Carmen was in French.  The place setting for Carmen was Spain.  Escamillo was a bull fighter.  Don Jose was a soldier and Carmen was a Gypsy.  In the remake, Escamillo becomes a boxer named Husky Miller whose lyrics are dubbed in by Marvin Hayes.  Don Jose becomes Joe, a soldier played by Harry Belafonte whose lyrics are dubbed by LeVern Hutcherson.  Carmen becomes “Carmen Jones” a cigarette girl played by the uber sexy Dorothy Dandridge.  Dandridge’s lyrics were dubbed in by Marilyn Horne.

I love opera.  I grew up on an Italian neighborhood in Brooklyn, NY.  My father had all of Caruso’s 78’s.  People on my block sat outside on Saturday nights singing opera on their porches.  I loved listening to Enrico Caruso, Mario Lanza, Enzio Pinza, Giuseppe Di Stefano, Franco Corelli, Mario Del Monaco and much later Placido Domingo and of course Luciano Pavarotti.  Saturday afternoon was opera in the afternoon on the radio.  I always dreamed that if I was reincarnated, I would come back as a great Italian tenor.

“Carmen Jones”, whether you want to call it a movie or stage play, was still a tragic opera.  The handsome soldier Joe is engaged to be married to the sweet girl next door Cindy Lou, played by Olga James.  He is seduced by the cigarette girl Carmen and deserting his post runs off with her.  Tragic operas do not end “happily ever after.”  I will say not anymore about the plot.

Carmen is the “no good girl” that men lust for.  She lives for the moment.  She loves for the moment.  She seduces whoever takes her fancy for the moment.  She sings a famous aria, “The Habanera” in which she proclaims:

If you don’t love me, I love you

Beware

But if I love you, if I love you

Beware

The bird you thought you’d surprise

Flapped its wings and flew away.

I have seen some operas made into musicals like Madame Butterfly into Miss Saigon and La Boheme into Rent.  These were adapted for a modern audience and the lyrics translated into English.  I have never seen any as well done as Carmen into Carmen Jones.  The music and lyrics embody the essence of the original opera to a degree that I would not have thought possible.  For instance, in the Bizet Opera, Escamillo sings in the famous “Toreador Song”:

The bull goes, he comes

He comes and strikes again

By shaking his banderillas

Full of fury, he runs

The circus is full of blood.  

(The original lyrics are sung in French)

In Carmen Jones, Husky Miller the boxer sings “Stand up and Fight”:

Stan’ up an’ fight

until you hear de bell,

Stan’ toe to toe,

Trade blow fer blow,

Keep punchin’ till you

make yer punches tell,

Show dat crowd watcher know!

Until you hear dat bell,

Dat final bell,

Stan’ up an’ fight like hell!

The movie musical opera “Carmen Jones” has every bit of the drama, passion and musical quality of the original opera Carmen.  I will not say any more because I am very biased here.  Watch it when you have a chance.  Whether or not you love opera, if you love music, you will love Carmen Jones.

download (1)

  1. Captains Courageous – 1937

“Captains Courageous” is the story of a young, spoiled child who learns humility and compassion for others.  It is a sad but ultimately heart-warming story of the bonding between a rough immigrant sailor Manuel played by Spencer Tracy and a rich privileged child Harvey played by Freddie Bartholomew.  Again, another ensemble cast of great actors make up this film.  You may remember names like Lionel Barrymore, Melvyn Douglas, Mickey Rooney, John Carradine, Spencer Tracy and a then 13-year-old child actor named Freddie Bartholomew.  Freddie was nominated in 1999 as one of the 250 Greatest Male Screen Legends by the American Film Institute.

The film took twelve months to shoot and took place mostly at sea.  From a story by Rudyard Kipling, the plot revolves around the transformation of a young boy named Harvey played by Freddie Bartholomew.  He is picked up by a fishing boat after falling off his father’s yacht.  He demands to be returned immediately to his father.  The fishermen refuse since it is financially impossible for them to stop their work and just go looking for the brat’s father.  There is always the question of whether or not the boy is really telling the truth about his father being so rich.  He is put to work for the first time in his life with chores and responsibilities.  Freddie goes from spoiled brat to mature and responsible young man.

At first, he refuses to do any work, so they refuse to feed him.  In time, he begrudgingly starts to do the work assigned.  He is taken under the wing of the great Spencer Tracy who plays Manuel an itinerant fisherman.  They form a bond which is touching, and the end of the movie will bring tears to the eyes of even the most hardened cynic.  Spencer Tracy won the Academy Award for Best Actor for his work in this film.  The movie was also nominated for three other Academy Awards.  That is all I am going to say.  Go do yourself another favor and watch one of the great movies of all time.

download (2)

  1. 12 Angry Men – 1957

I can identify with this movie because I was a jury foreman in 1996.  Three months after the trial ended, I was hauled into court facing a possible charge of jury tampering.

“Appellant was convicted of disorderly conduct and acquitted of assault in the fifth degree.  Appellant moved to dismiss based on legally inconsistent verdicts.  The court denied appellant’s motion.  Prior to appellant’s sentencing, the court presented the parties with a copy of ‘Observations on Quality in the Courtroom: By a Juror,’ written by jury foreman Dr. John Persico, Jr., which alleged racial bias and misconduct by the jury.  Appellant moved for a new trial, but the motion was denied.” 

Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (1996).

STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN COURT OF APPEALS

C9-97-1608

State of Minnesota,

Do I have to say it?  I am starting to sound repetitious.  It had an ensemble cast.  Awesome lineup of some of the best actors to ever step foot in Hollywood.  Some of the twelve jury members included Henry Fonda, Lee J. Cobb, Joseph Sweeney, Martin Balsam, Jack Klugman, E. G. Marshall, Jack Warden, and Ed Begley.  “12 Angry Men” is a 1957 American legal drama film directed by Sidney Lumet, adapted from a 1954 teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose.

The film tells the story of a jury of 12 men as they deliberate the conviction or acquittal of a teenager charged with the murder of his father.  At first it appears that eleven of the jurors believe that the boy is guilty.  One holdout Juror 8 played by Henry Fonda still has a reasonable doubt.  His nemesis Juror 3, played by Lee J. Cobb angrily disagrees and becomes the antagonist to Fonda’s protagonist.  The battle for conviction between the two jurors finds the other jurors torn from one side to the other.  Evidence is presented.  Logic versus emotions creates rages in the jury room.  Not one juror can escape the heated arguments that ensue.  The conflict highlights the moral dilemmas that face all of us when we must decide the life or death of another human being.

“12 Angry Men” received acclaim from critics, despite a mediocre box office performance.  At the 30th Academy Awards, it was nominated for Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Screenplay.  It is regarded by many as one of the greatest films ever made.

If you have ever been on a jury, you may have some empathy for the “12 Angry Men” in this movie.  My jury misadventures helped me to see the strengths and weaknesses of the jury system.  A jury is only as good as the people on it.  But as Hubert Humphrey once said, “A democracy is a system that achieves extraordinary results with ordinary people.”  In the end, there will never be enough extraordinary people to make a difference.  We will always have to rely on the common man and common woman to keep our democratic system of government strong.

Conclusions:

 A great movie needs a stellar cast.  It needs a great script.  It needs a great screenplay.  It does not need people murdered or shot in one scene after another.  It does not need endless chase scenes.  It does not need grotesque scenes of people getting their bodies torn limb from limb.  Perhaps subtlety is a lost art.  One of the most moving and sad scenes I ever saw in a movie was from a Gary Cooper movie.  He arrives home after a band of Indians have attacked his home.  The house is in flames.  He goes looking for his wife.  He finds her on the other side of a rock fence.  You do not see her body.  You only see the look on his face.  It is heart breaking.  I get teary eyed just thinking about it.  You do not need to see her broken battered bloody body to know what happened to her.

That’s All for Now Folks! 

Leave a comment if you enjoyed my writeups or just go watch the movies. 

Manufactured Drama: TV’s Phony Marriage to Reality

05 Oct 2023 5 Comments

by Dr. John Persico Jr. in Uncategorized Tags: , , , , , ,

Update:   Oct 5th, 2023

I wrote the following blog ten years ago.  I think it still holds its validity despite the fact that some of the named TV shows are no longer on the air.  My general premises remain accurate.  

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

I get a lot of strange looks from people when I tell them that I do not have a TV set.  Furthermore, I emphasize that I would not watch TV if I did have one.  Many people then apologize and tell me that they agree with me and that TV is really bad but that they only watch the “good” stuff.   Pause!  Inevitably, this reasoning is followed by: “You really should watch:  The History Channel, The Discovery Channel or PBS.  There are some good shows on these channels.”  They generally ignore my explanation that I can catch any “Good Stuff”  on the Internet via Netflix On-Demand or even direct at the various channels where I can access archives of previous shows.  Thus, I see what I want to see, when I want to see it and without commercials or other idiotic distractions.

Of course, there is the problem that I slowly and inexorably become out of touch with the “mainstream” culture.  As new versions of “Survivors, X-Factor, American Idol, Pawn Wars, Game of Thrones, and NCIS come on, I have no clue as to what these shows are about or who stars in them or why I should watch them.  I feel like a person born in the 18th century who is suddenly catapulted into the 21st Century.  My clothing, concepts, ideas and knowledge of the current zeitgeist marks me as a “Stranger from a strange land.”  I am a Stranger in the midst of all these TV viewers with their myriad diaspora of shows each complete with followers, devotees and addicts.  God forbid I say anything negative about the Teutuls or Duck Dynasty or Holly Boo Boo or SNL.  I must be old or ancient or senile.  How could I miss the beauty and aesthetics of these shows?  (By the way, I will not include sports shows in this blog, since they merit a topic all by themselves.)

Nevertheless, for hours at a time, I am frequently obliged to watch TV.  It happens this way.  Karen and I go to visit a relative, friend, daughter etc.  We sit down in the living room in front of a MEGA 200 inch TV complete with loudspeakers, amplifiers, megaphones and surround sound.  We talk for a few minutes and then the TV gets turned on.  In the next three to four hours, we see snippets of over a ZILLION shows.  My mind starts to reel from the paucity of knowledge and useless amount of information that is being directed at me from the BOOB tube.  I am gracious and do not say anything negative about TV.  Fortunately at some point, I am saved.  Either it is time for dinner, time to leave or time to go to bed.  In either case, my brain is overdue for “time-out” from TV land.  The good part of this travail is that I am now current again with 21st century culture. I now know what moves the hoi polloi.  I can converse with some degree of discernment on the relative merits of Simon Cowell as a judge versus Kelly Rowland.  I can reminisce with those who mourn the death of the Sopranos or Breaking Bad.  Furthermore, I have new content with which to write my next 1000 blogs condemning the inanity that I have somehow managed to survive before my brain totally rotted.

What have I learned from watching 21st Century TV?   TV today is all about “Manufactured” drama.  But you may argue, isn’t most literature and entertainment about drama?  Circus acts, war stories, murder mysteries, Shakespeare, opera, cartoons, police stories, sitcoms, sports and almost any other form of entertainment that one can think about all involve drama.  How is TV today different from “traditional” drama?  Let’s start by looking at the definition of the words we are using here:

Drama: 

1: a:  a composition in verse or prose intended to portray life or character or to tell a story usually involving conflicts and emotions through action and dialogue and typically designed for theatrical performance.

    b:  a movie or television production with characteristics (as conflict) of a serious play; broadly :  a play, movie, or television production with a serious tone or subject <a police drama>

Manufactured:

1:  to make into a product suitable for use

2: a:  to make from raw materials by hand or by machinery

     b:  to produce according to an organized plan and with division of labor

     c:  prefabricate <a manufactured home>

To get a better idea of what I am talking about, I will use a concrete example.  Let’s look at Shakespeare’s Macbeth and compare it to the TV show X-Factor.  Macbeth was a story about a fictional King who may have been meant to resemble in part a real Scottish king of bygone times.  The play’s main plot involves the desire of Macbeth to become King and the greed and depths of depravity that can bring someone to immoral acts to achieve their goals.  The themes are powerful because we can all identify with them.  The story is fictional, the lines are made up, and the characters are drawn from Shakespeare’s fertile mind.  Nevertheless, nothing seems contrived or artificial about this play.  The themes of power and ambition are strong because they resemble many such struggles throughout history.  In fact, all of us can imagine wanting something so bad, that we might even consider unethical acts to obtain it.  Macbeth becomes an icon for the individual who will sacrifice their morals and ethics for ambition.

X-Factor is a TV “reality” show in which singers and entertainers compete for a chance to win a grand prize. The format has one hundred contestants battling it out for just twenty-four places.  Each of four judges gives their favorite contestants one of their six seats.  The drama of competition is heightened by having four judges who alternately select and then reject the very people they selected.

The X-Factor producers are forced to create cruel twists to the competition because viewers are becoming immune to sob stories, a psychologist has claimed.  Chartered psychologist Dr. Rick Norris believes that program makers have to keep shocking the audience to keep up high viewing figures.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2449808/X-Factor-producers-deliberately-creating-cruel-twists-claims-psychologist.html

Watching or reading Macbeth evokes themes of morality, justice, greed, ambition, loyalty and ethics.  Watching X-factor evokes themes of contrived, fake, phoney, pseudo, cruel, malicious and obnoxious behavior.  Watching Macbeth involves strong emotions wherein I can reflect on the morals that must mitigate behavior and action in the real world.  Watching X-Factor, I am appalled by the fake melodrama and artificial behaviors of the judges and contestants.  While Macbeth has no claims to be “reality” drama, TV shows like X-Factor seek to portray themselves as real.

The feeling I get from watching most current TV shows can be summed up as “CONTRIVED and PHONY.”  Real people don’t behave like TV people do.  Real people work 9 to 5 jobs and don’t live on Fantasy Island or spend their days at Pawn Shops.  However, real people can be coerced by TV producers to act like “drama queens.”  A few examples will illustrate my point.  The following is from a graduate thesis:  Behind the Scenes: Uncovering the structures and manipulations of Tabloid Talk Show Workers, Guests and Audiences.  – By  Kelly Thompson Losch Deshotel

The producers have the ability to persuade and intimidate guests into any behavior they feel is beneficial to the program’s ratings. One associate producer (AP) tells the guests that they will be portrayed as cowards if they do not defend themselves during the last segment when the studio audience is given the opportunity to voice opinions or ask questions about the guests on the program. “Get mad, get out there into the audience, they’ll respect you more if you fight back,” this AP exclaims.  Directly following the commercial break, the guests jump out of their chairs and dart into the audience after every audience comment.

The next example is from Entertainment News and is about the Survivors.  In a question about the “reality” of this show the author states:

We’re not too sure about the “pure” aspect of the show, especially since nothing on Survivor is as real as you want it to be. The contestants are filmed as they walk to Tribal Council along jagged rocks and beautiful oceanic views, but as a matter of fact, the contestants merely walk about 500 meters before they get picked up by a production vehicle with blacked-out windows. The contestants are not allowed to talk during this one hour drive to Tribal Council and if they arrive at the Tribal Council destination before dusk, they have to wait outside of the Tribal Council area until the atmosphere is perfect for filming. Several contestants have complained about this fact in the past and have revealed that the time spent at Tribal Council sometimes stretched into the early hours of the next morning to get all the dialogue pinned down.

 With very little research it can be shown that almost all of the drama on TV is “Manufactured.”  There is little real about “reality” TV and there is even less about TV that can be said to have any ethical, moral or spiritually redeeming value.  TV was becoming a vast wasteland in the sixties and it has continued its march towards degeneracy, vulgarity, and mediocrity with little or no resistance from the vast millions of viewers in TV land.   In search of a means of transcending the banality and ordinariness of everyday existence, millions of Americans have become addicted to fake synthetic versions of life that seem to offer something missing in their own lives.  Turn on, Tune in and Drop out.  Americans have added TV to drugs in their search for an alternate reality.   The reality on TV is the reality of dreams while the everyday reality that most TV addicts lead is one of frustration, monotony and boredom.

 Get a life.  Turn the TV off.  Use your imagination.

Time for Questions:

What do I have against TV?  Why criticize something that brings so much joy to so many people’s lives?  Did a TV fall on me when I was young and forever prejudice me against the BOOB tube?  What would happen to America if people spent less time watching TV?  What if instead of 36 hours per week that people spent watching TV, they only spent 18?  What if we demanded an end to the fake reality that is a daily occurrence on TV?  What if TV was more informative and educational and less exploitative and demeaning?  How much TV do you want your kids to watch?  Do you think most images and characters on TV should be role models for others?

Life is just beginning.

The Worlds First Un-Blog: How we can solve all of the worlds problems!

12 May 2014 7 Comments

by Dr. John Persico Jr. in Uncategorized Tags: , , , , , , ,

Image

I woke up this morning and told Karen that while she was at church, I was going to write an un-blog.  She looked puzzled and wanted to know if that meant I was not going to write a blog.  I said “Of course, I am going to write a blog but it will be an un-blog.”  “Well,” she said, “What is an un-blog?” I replied that it was like an un-birthday party. I actually did not have the slightest clue what it was or could be but I knew that today I was going to invent an un-blog.  With no templates, I would have to invent it as I went along.  I did not bother to Google “un-blog”, so you will forgive me if I reinvent the wheel.  (Actually after I finished this “un-blog”,  I did Google the term to see if I was a “Johnny come lately” or had really invented something new.)

There are several reasons that I come to the point in my blogging where I now know that I need to write an un-blog.  First of all, many of you are probably tired of my advice, admonitions, critiques, complaints, exhortations, etc. about the state of the world and its many problems.  This week alone, I found over five million problems that needed solving in the pages of CNN, MSN, FOX and BBC news.  My best guess is that the number of problems we face in the world has steadily escalated since I was born.  Thus, despite my efforts and other bloggers like me, the number of problems just seems to keep growing exponentially.

Well, being the strategic planner that I like to think I am, I took out my handy “world problem solving software.” I programmed it to prioritize the “greatest” problems this week that I could solve with my exorbitant ego and unlimited resources of advice and solutions.  I must have had low batteries because my screen suddenly went blank and it started flashing “I quit, I quit, I quit.”  Perhaps it was a virus or some type of Trojan?  I immediately turned it off.  This has now created a dilemma.  How can I pick the single most important world problem to solve, if my software is malfunctioning? Would my many followers (considerably less than George Takei) accept me simply choosing a great big humongous problem and solving if for them and the rest of the world?

No! This would not be fair to you my faithful readers and followers.  You will only accept me going after the biggest baddest problems out there selected scientifically and with great forethought.  You expect me to solve these incredible problems with shrewd insight and analytic ability.  You want me to provide solutions that would make Solomon humble.  You expect me to solve only the most critical problems facing the world.  Simple selection would never do for my followers.  Knowing these facts, I felt lost and confused.  With millions of problems out there and my software on the blink, I was like Garry Kasparov trying to win against Big Blue Computer.  I am only human; the stress is unbearable at times.  Thousands of followers, (well maybe a few hundred) depending on my blog each week for advice and succor!

In truth again (Never trust anyone who says “in truth” or “trust me”) I could not select a single problem this week to tackle.  I am weary of solving all of the problems in the world. The burden has become too great.  Simply perusing my blogs, you will note the number of critical world and USA problems that I have already solved this past year.  To make matters worse, to date, I have not received one penny for my efforts or even an invitation to the White House.  I have not been knighted or given the Profiles in Courage award either. Perhaps, I missed the phone calls from Obama and the Queen.  I must remember to check my voice mail more often or at least my text messages.

It is very frustrating.  No matter how altruistic I am, I crave some simple recognition.  It is a lot like being a superhero but no one knows it.  What is the point of having super-powers if no one is there to applaud idealize and worship you?  I can accept that a few of my miraculous ideas and solutions might have been slightly off mark, but I cannot accept that all of them were.  Furthermore, please go to my first blog site where I have posted over 600 blogs dealing with various and assorted issues affecting the world.  See if some of these blogs don’t bring tears to your eyes or joy to your heart.  (You can find them at www.timeparables.blogspot.com)  All of these issues has led me this week to create the world’s first “un-blog.”

It is my considered but humble opinion that in an un-blog, I (the Blogger) should not solve any problems.  A typical blogger writes their blog either to solve problems or to give opinions and advice. It is not fair, that you the reader (The Bloggee) get all this free advice and give nothing in return.  It is only right that in an “un-blog”, you the reader and faithful follower, should be the ones to solve the problems and give me advice.  It is time to pony up.  How many of my blogs have you commented on?  How many have you disagreed with?  What have you taken a stand on?  What has stopped you from being an “un-blogger?”  It is your turn to pay me back for all the solutions and advice I have so freely and graciously given to you.  Think of your world without my blog.  As the walrus said in “Alice in Wonderland”:

Image

“The time has come,” the Walrus said,
“To talk of many things:
Of shoes–and ships–and sealing-wax–
Of cabbages–and kings–
And why the sea is boiling hot–
And whether pigs have wings.”

I would love to hear your take on “What are the biggest problems the world faces.”  I would really like to hear what you think.  (See my questions below.)  Send me an email persico.john@gmail.com or post your replies in the comments section.  Speak out.  Today is your chance to be an un-blogger.  It is your golden opportunity to help solve the many problems facing the world or to at least offer some advice on what you think those problems are.  Perhaps, your brilliance and erudition might be discovered on my blog and you will be invited to the White House.  (Please do not hold your breath.)  If you do get invited, please, please take me along. 

Time for Questions: 

What are the biggest problems you face in your life?  What are your solutions?  What do you think we should do to save the world?  How can we deal with apathy and those that do not care?  Where do we start?  Should we have major political changes in our constitution?  How could we get these?  What would you like to see changed in the world or even just in your home town?  What does Persico mean “Life is just beginning?”

Life is just beginning.

I finally broke down and looked up “Un-blog” on Google.  Here is what I found.

  1. un- blog – definition and meaning – Wordnik

https://www.wordnik.com/words/un-%20blog

Sorry, no example sentences found. Related Words. Log in or sign up to add your own related words. Wordmap. (beta). Word visualization. Comments. Log in or …

I think this means that there are no definitions.  I can thus claim the distinction of being the first “un-blogger” on the internet.  Or perhaps my readers and faithful followers who have answered my questions should be the first to receive this distinction.

Here is my definition of an “un-blog.”

“A blog site where the readers post opinions and solve problems and the blogger simply listens and does not weigh in with advice or solutions.  A place of introspection rather than extrospection.”