Robert Reich and I have at least one thing in common. He hates bullies and so do I. In his most recent book, “Coming Up Short”, he talks about how he had to deal with bullies because he was so short. My dad was 6’4” tall and could often be a bully. I had enough abuse from him growing up that I also came to hate bullies. I had many fights when I was younger where I defended either myself or equally often other people physically against bullies. Robert Reich points out that one major reason for Trump’s popularity is that he is a Bullie’s Bully. Millions of Americans who have been bullied by an unjust system of economics, education, justice, health care and government see Trump as their protector or even savior. Reich notes:
“A large portion of America has felt bullied and harassed for decades. They’ve worked their asses off but haven’t gotten anywhere. Employers have fired them without cause or notice, made them into contract workers without any security or rights, spied on them during working hours, and otherwise treated them like children.
They’ve been bullied by landlords who keep hiking their rent. By banks that keep adding large fees to whatever they owe. By health insurers and hospitals that charge them an arm and a leg. By corporate grocery monopolies that push up food prices.
Many of them voted for Trump because he promised he’d be their bully. He blamed others — immigrants, people of color, transgender people, foreign traders — for what they endured. He thereby found scapegoats for their deep feelings of powerlessness, vulnerability, and shame. It’s one of the oldest of demagogic tricks.
Democrats could have put the blame where it belonged — on monopolistic corporations and billionaires that abused their wealth and power by taking over our politics.
Democrats could have demanded higher taxes on big corporations and the wealthy to pay for childcare and eldercare. Tougher antitrust laws to break up monopolies. Labor law reforms that made it easier for workers to form unions and gain bargaining power. Universal health care. Strict regulation of big banks so they couldn’t shaft average people. And an end to big money in our politics.
But they have not — not loudly, not with one voice, not with the clarity the people need to hear.” — Robert Reich 8/24/25
The 2024 election is already being dissected in books and think-tank reports, but the clearest story is this: Democrats misread the electorate as well as deserted the electorate. Caught up in arguments over gender identify, abortion rights and WOKE manifestos, the Democrats preached to a crowd with more important concerns on their minds. Jefferson said that Democracy was a rule of the majority with a concern for the minority. Democrats have reversed his message. They now practice a rule for the minority with little or no concern for the majority.
They believed that campaigning on democracy and abortion rights would be enough to hold the White House. Those are vital issues, but voters were telling pollsters something else — they were worried most about the price of groceries, rent, and gas. In swing districts, immigration and border control loomed even larger. By downplaying those concerns, Democrats left the playing field wide open for Republicans.
Validated voter studies show that turnout favored 2020 Trump voters. Younger and non-white men — groups Democrats once counted on — swung toward Republicans in significant numbers. Many of these voters wanted practical answers on wages, security, and fairness. They didn’t get them.
So, what must Democrats do if they hope to regain the House, Senate, or Presidency? Three steps stand out.
First, make the economy the front page of their campaigns, with plain talk about jobs, housing, and cost of living. Find people who can speak the language of the average American and not in a voice only understood by Ph.D. graduates. I am often bewildered by the terminology that some of the Democrats throw out. Yesterday, I learned that the new vocabulary for “homeless” people is now “unhoused” people. Do the Democrats really think this is going to make a difference to the people living in cardboard boxes throughout America?
When I look at the new head of the Democratic National Committee (Ken Martin), I see a man who exemplifies everything that is wrong with the Democrats. If his bio on Wikipedia is to be believed, Ken never did a day’s physical labor in his life (At least not in any paid position.) What makes this an even more grievous fact, is that he was given this position after Harris’s loss to Trump. I doubt a guy with his background has any clue about the problems of the working class in America. By the way, I am sure Ken is a nice guy, a good husband and a good father. But that is not going to get Democrats elected.
Second, develop a credible immigration strategy that pairs border security with fair reforms. Like it or not, immigration has been a major issue for Americans because as Reich noted, both parties have demonized immigrants as vulgar, uncouth, criminals who only want to take jobs away from legal Americans. This is not an unusual state of affairs. Even Benjamin Franklin had his biases when it came to immigrants. Many of these changed over time as Ben observed the habits and ethics of other immigrant groups to the colonies.
I have said we need a “fair immigration policy” and not an “anti-immigration policy.” A number of years ago (at least seven) I wrote a series of blogs on the subject of immigration as I could witness it down here in Arizona. You might say that we are on the front lines of immigration and have a long history of immigration. The land I now live on was once part of Mexico until the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. Some of my neighbors have history going back to Mexico over two hundred years. See my blogs:
- Thinking about Immigration – Part 1: We Need a Fair Immigration Policy – Not an Anti-Immigration Policy!
- Thinking about Immigration, Part 2: Pros and Cons of a Fair Immigration Policy!
- Thinking about Immigration, Part 3: Living in the Path of Illegal Immigration.
Third, speak in everyday language. Too often Democrats rely on insider jargon that alienates working families. Like it or not, most Democrats have become associated with the idea of PC or political correctness. I am no enemy of using terminology that minorities and others find more respectful and less insulting. However, some of the PC efforts have become ludicrous and only help to make the Democrats laughing stocks and open to scorn from the very people they need to help support them. Here are a few examples:
- The use of “people experiencing food insecurity”
In May 2025, a debate over language use within the Democratic party was highlighted by the Washington Post. One specific example given was referring to individuals as “people experiencing food insecurity” instead of the more direct phrase “people going hungry” or maybe even people “starving to death”!
- The replacement of gendered terms like “spokesman”
The movement towards gender-neutral language has led to the replacement of many words to avoid implying a specific gender, regardless of the individual’s identity. For instance, the term “spokesperson” is often used instead of “spokesman” or “spokeswoman.” I have a problem remembering which words to use. Should I say fireman or fireperson? Should I say postman or postperson? Should I say fisherman or fisherperson? Of course I do not want to offend anybody, so the only answer is to say nothing? Or should I check with each fisherperson first to see what they prefer? How do you say fisherperson in Spanish?
- “Person of color” (POC) instead of “minority”
Some find the term “POC” to be an overly broad and imprecise label that lumps together many distinct racial and ethnic groups, despite its progressive origins. I am concerned about this label since I have always thought that being a White person I had some color. I realize that many people see White people as more pink hued than white, but pink is still a color even if I do not like the idea of being a Pink person.
In Conclusion:
Democrats do not need to abandon values of equality and freedom. They need to marry those values to tangible solutions that the average people can feel in their daily lives. They need to drop some of the bullshit that makes everyone think of them as WIMPS. They need to fight and not keep talking about “hands” across the aisle. When someone punches me in the face, I do not hand them a rose. If Democrats want a path back to governing majorities they are going to have to:
- Walk like the majority
- Talk like the majority
- Act like the majority
As long as Democrats insist on being isolated people who live in expensive mansions and go to exclusive Ivy League colleges, they will not have a chance to get back into power. Don’t tell me about their good intentions. As the saying goes “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.” — Saint Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153)
Aging Capriciously 