Are Americans Brainwashed?  Revisiting Consumer Culture Through the Lens of “The Society of the Spectacle”  — By John Persico (with Metis)

Introduction

In 2018 I asked a provocative question: Are Americans brainwashed?  At the time, what I meant by “brainwashing” was a kind of conditioned conformity — an unconscious habituation to consumerism.  We buy, accumulate, and consume not because we need to, but because something deep within our society tells us that our worth, security, and happiness depend on it.

A few weeks ago, I encountered a work that reframed much of what I was trying to say: Guy Debord’s 1967 classic The Society of the SpectacleDebord, a French Marxist theorist and filmmaker, argues that modern capitalism doesn’t just sell goods — it sells images, identities, and perceptions of reality itself.  In doing so, it creates what he calls a “spectacle” — a world where representation replaces lived experience, and passive consumption replaces active life.

Today I believe the idea of “brainwashing” isn’t just a metaphor.  It is a lived condition of our society — one that manifests in our politics, our personal relationships, and above all, in how we see ourselves and the world.

But if we are to diagnose this condition accurately, we also need a prescription for how we might undo it.

I. The Diagnosis: What Is the Spectacle?

In The Society of the Spectacle, Debord makes a bold claim:
“The spectacle is not a collection of images; it is a social relationship between people that is mediated by images.”

What Does This Mean?

  1. The Spectacle Is a Social Condition, Not Just Advertising

We tend to think of consumerism as simply “too many ads,” “too much marketing,” or “too much stuff.” But Debord pushes us deeper: the spectacle isn’t only the marketing — it’s the way we relate to reality itself through mediated images.

In other words:

  • It’s not just the billboard that matters — it’s that we now interpret our lives as if we were on billboards.
  • It’s not just the advertisement — it’s that we start to see ourselves as advertisements for our own lifestyle, identity, and status.

In the spectacle, images don’t just sell products.  They sell versions of reality.  They tell us what success looks like, what happiness looks like, what security looks like, and what a good life looks like.  And we internalize that script — often without realizing we’ve been cast in it.

  1. Consumption Replaces Experience

Debord argues that the spectacle replaces real life with representation of life.

Think about how often we:

  • Take pictures of experiences instead of experiencing them.
  • Check likes, shares, and comments instead of connecting.
  • Pursue prestige, status, or image instead of meaning.

We no longer live our lives in the fullest sense — we consume them, display them, and measure them.  This is not just consumerism — it is spectatorship.  We watch life, we watch others, and we are watched.  We are subjects of our own mediated narratives.

  1. The Spectacle Is Universal But Uneven

Debord notes that the spectacle isn’t just advertising or corporate marketing.
It includes:

  • Mass media
  • Entertainment
  • Social media
  • Politics
  • Consumer brands
  • Cultural norms
  • Public relations

In the society of the spectacle, everything becomes commodified, including our attention, our desires, and even our dissent.  Even counter-culture becomes a brand.

This is why Debord’s critique resonates with my original thesis: American society doesn’t just create consumers of products — it creates consumers of images, identities, and scripted realities.  We are persuaded not only to buy what we don’t need, but to define ourselves through those purchases.

II. Are Americans Brainwashed? A Reframed Answer

So, let’s revisit the question I asked in 2018: Are Americans brainwashed?

If by “brainwashed” we mean:

  • conditioned to think in ways that benefit corporate and political interests,
  • socialized to equate meaning with consumption, and
  • habituated to accept the spectacle as reality…

Then the answer is yes — to a significant extent.

But the spectacle is not an overt force with an agenda.  It doesn’t need to be explicit to be pervasive.  It works because:

  1. We participate willingly — we seek validation through consumption, clicks, images, status.
  2. We mistake representation for reality — what we see on screens or in ads becomes our standard for life.
  3. We rarely interrogate the source of our desires — we assume our wants are our own.

Debord writes that the spectacle is a form of alienation — where life is lived not directly, but through representations.  When we are alienated from our own experience, we are easier to influence because we are no longer anchored in our own desires — only in the images we consume.

III. The Mechanisms of the “American Brainwashing”

Let’s unpack some specific mechanisms by which the spectacle perpetuates conditioned consumption:

  1. Identity Through Consumption

Corporations don’t just sell products — they sell lifestyles, identities, and social status.

  • Owning a certain car means you are cool.
  • Wearing a certain brand means you are successful.
  • Posting the right image means you are interesting.

We learn to define ourselves through what we display, not what we experience.

  1. The Attention Economy

Modern media doesn’t just want our money — it wants our attention.
Attention becomes the rarest and most valuable commodity.  Algorithms are optimized to:

  • keep you looking,
  • keep you scrolling,
  • keep you craving more.

This amplifies the spectacle because it conditions instinctive reactions — not reflective thought.

  1. Social Media as a Spectacle Machine

Platforms like Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube are engines of the spectacle:

  • They amplify images over ideas.
  • They reward emotion over reflection.
  • They privilege appearance over substance.

The result?  A world where image consumption replaces authentic engagement.

  1. Debt and Consumption as Fulfillment

Credit markets and consumer finance turn consumption into addiction.
Payday loans, credit cards, easy financing — all encourage buying now, paying later, and justifying desires as needs.

This isn’t just financial — it’s psychological:
We feel like we are fulfilling ourselves by spending, even when we are not.

IV.  What Brainwashing Is Really Like: Mindlessness and the Spectacle

Here’s where Ellen Langer’s work on mindlessness becomes useful.

Langer describes mindlessness as a state in which behavior is rigid and thought is shallow — where we act on autopilot.

How does this connect to Debord?

  • The spectacle thrives on mindlessness.
  • If people thought deeply about why they want certain things, how they spend their time, and what their values are, the spectacle would weaken.
  • The spectacle depends on unexamined life.

So, we might define the “brainwashing” of Americans not as overt coercion, but as collective mindlessness — not thinking deeply about how our desires are shaped, what we consume, and why.

Mindlessness and the spectacle are two sides of the same coin:
One is cognitive, the other is cultural.
Both detach us from genuine experience.

V.  The Prescription: How Do We Undo the Brainwashing?

If we’ve diagnosed the problem, the urgent challenge is: How do we counteract the spectacle and undo conditioned consumption?

Here’s a multi-layered prescription:

  1. Cultivate Mindfulness

Langer’s work teaches us that awareness is not automatic — it must be practiced.

Mindfulness in consumption means:

  • Asking why you want something before you act.
  • Not mistaking wanting for needing.
  • Reflecting on the social and psychological forces shaping your desires.

Mindfulness isn’t only meditation — it’s active awareness of your internal life.
It’s questioning your impulses rather than obeying them.

  1. Reclaim Authentic Experience

If the spectacle is a representation of life, its antidote is direct experience of life.

This means:

  • Valuing real human interaction over mediated interactions.
  • Experiencing events without first documenting them for others.
  • Rediscovering activities that aren’t commodified for Instagram or TikTok.

Experience should be lived, not posted.

  1. Reduce Passive Consumption

We live in a world designed for passive consumption:

  • Scroll feeds
  • Binge media
  • Buy products based on ads

Combat this by:

  • Setting intentional limits on screen time.
  • Choosing content that teaches, not only entertains.
  • Prioritizing creation over consumption.
  1. Examine Economic Structures

The spectacle is supported by economic systems that profit from:

  • Continuous consumption
  • Planned obsolescence
  • Debt accumulation
  • Attention monetization

Undermining the spectacle requires economic literacy:

  • Understanding how credit, interest, and consumer culture are connected
  • Questioning advertising claims
  • Supporting sustainable, local, and meaningful alternatives
  1. Build Communities of Critical Thought

Spectacle thrives in isolation and individualism.

Counter this by:

  • Forming discussion groups
  • Reading cooperatively
  • Sharing reflections instead of consumer gossip
  • Encouraging long conversations, not short clicks

Detroit philosopher Cornel West said, “We must refuse the politics of disengagement and nihilism.”  This means engaging deeply with ideas — not passively consuming them.

  1. Political Awareness and Media Literacy

Spectacle extends into politics:

  • Politicians perform for cameras.
  • News becomes entertainment.
  • Outrage replaces inquiry.

Undoing brainwashing means:

  • Learning to distinguish facts from spectacle
  • Examining incentives behind media narratives
  • Teaching critical media literacy
  1. Reframe Success and Identity

Finally, we must challenge the equation:

More stuff = more value.

Redefine success as:

  • Deeper relationships
  • Richer experiences
  • Intellectual curiosity
  • Community contributions

The self we cultivate should be internal, not a brand.

VI.  What the Spectacle Cannot Control

Here’s the hopeful part:

The spectacle operates through images and representations.
But it cannot fully replace:

  • Moment-to-moment consciousness
  • Genuine love and empathy
  • Deep reflection and insight
  • Meaningful community
  • Unmediated experience

These are areas where the spectacle fails — exactly because they cannot be commodified or packaged.

Conclusion: Toward a Life Unmediated

So, are Americans brainwashed?
Not in the literal sense of having thoughts forcibly replaced — but in the structural sense that society conditions our perceptions of reality, desire, identity, and fulfillment.

Guy Debord’s spectacle framework helps us see that consumerism isn’t just about goods — it’s about how we see the world and ourselves.

Ellen Langer’s work reminds us that undoing this starts with awareness — moving from mindlessness to mindful life.

The good news is that mind, choice, and experience cannot be fully outsourced to images or corporations.  We can reclaim them by practicing mindfulness, re-centering authentic experience, and questioning the narratives sold to us every day.

The challenge is not only social — it’s deeply personal.
But once we begin to see how the spectacle shapes us, we can choose to look beyond the images and toward the real world — toward a life to live, not a life to watch.

America today is a deeply divided nation and a deeply divided people.  The brainwashing we get from the sources discussed have been major contributors to creating the divide we now live in.  Few people on either side of the divide are happy the way things are.  We yearn for the “good old days.”  Days reflected in Norman Rockwell pictures of America that portray a different country than we now see.

It is true that “Happy Days” never did not exist equally in this country for all people, but at least we had the ability to still talk to people who we disagreed with and sometimes see a new perspective.  We had a country where people once talked about morals and ethics.  Today, our perspectives and beliefs are like a wall of granite.  Rather than a divide, we have a stone wall that we have built.  The wall is almost impenetrable.  It seems impossible to get over it, under it or around it.  The problem with destroying this wall is that it exists in our minds and that is the hardest thing in the world to change.  Until we open our minds and hearts, we will be stuck behind a granite wall that separates our nation and people.

What is a Humanitarian?

maxresdefault

It is not unusual to hear someone refer to the need for more humanity.  We often hear about “Calls” for humanitarian needs.  But what does it mean to exercise humanity?  What are our humanitarian needs?  Who is a real humanitarian?  Should we all strive to be humanitarians?  Can you get a diploma or a degree in humanitarianism?  My Google AI program gave me the following definition for a “humanitarian”:

A humanitarian is a person who is concerned with the welfare of others.  They may work to improve the happiness and health of people.    Humanitarians can be volunteers or paid employees.”

Humanitarian-Charter-cartoons-6

The last few years in the USA, Humanitarians and humanitarianism seem to be in scarce supply.  More people are concerned with how much they can buy and the fact that “Black Friday” is fast approaching than they are with improving the happiness and health of other people.  I find it very confusing that a large portion of Americans claim that the USA is a Christian Nation or that it should be.  My reading of the Bible gives me a different understanding of what a Christian is and how they behave.  Recently, I discovered the term “Cultural Christians.”  A “Cultural Christian” is a Christian by birth.  Someone who is born into a family of Christians or is baptized into a Christian denomination shortly after their birth.

Calling upon my AI program again, a “Cultural Christian” is defined as, “Someone who identifies as a Christian but doesn’t have a personal relationship with Jesus.”  In other words, a Cultural Christian does not have a clue as to the teachings of Jesus Christ or any other Christian prophet, Saint, or proselytizer.  Ironic isn’t it that many of these same people call on the name of Jesus to save them.  I suspect that if Jesus were alive today, he would ask them to repent before they went to hell.  A song (You Don’t Love God If You Don’t Love Your Neighbor) that I recently heard by Rhonda Vincent has the following lines:

There are many people, who will say they’re Christians

And they live like Christians on the Sabbath day

But come Monday morning, till the coming Sunday

They will fight their neighbor all along the way

Oh, you don’t love God

If you don’t love your neighbor.

Gérôme_-_La_rentrée_des_félins_1902-1-of4o8rppoxx3zn8toq8ws79zz8zqsftfoxkhwq8olkTwo thousand years ago, the Roman Empire started its decline after having been the greatest empire that the world had yet seen.  Many historians point to the decadence of the Roman Empire during its decline.  “Decadence” is defined by the Oxford On-Line Dictionary as, “Moral or cultural decline as characterized by excessive indulgence in pleasure or luxury.”  The Romans had their “Bread and Circuses.”  The Oxford Dictionary defines “Bread and Circuses” as, “A diet of entertainment or political policies on which the masses are fed to keep them happy and docile.”  For many, football and politics are the bread and circuses or our American Empire.  I think the rot and decay in America today goes much deeper than that.  Here is my list of some of the decadence that I see in the USA today:

  • Excessive consumerism and a frenzy to have bigger and bigger stuff
  • Excessive shopping till we drop, more and more stuff
  • Excessive eating leading to mega levels of obesity in America
  • Excessive time spent watching TV, movies, and other entertainment
  • Obsession with sports and team affiliation from grade school to the NFL
  • Excessive casino gambling
  • Pull tabs, scratch offs, lotteries
  • Drugs and alcohol addiction
  • Greed and more greed. Forever, cutting taxes so the greedy can have even more and the poor and needy can have even less
  • And now we have added “On-line Sports Betting.”

You Don’t Love God If You Don’t Love Your Neighbor

If you gossip about him, if you never have mercy

If he gets into trouble, and you don’t try to help him

Then you don’t love your neighbor

greed versus humanity

The more I write this blog, the more I think of the prophet Jeremiah.  Jeremiah constantly called upon the Israelites to turn away from their wicked ways and dependence upon idols and false gods and return to God.  For his troubles, Jeremiah was stoned to death.  But Jeremiah did more than just rail against sin and evil.  He also tried to give hope to his countrymen.  He promised that a “New Covenant” was coming to all those who followed God’s laws.  This covenant would supersede the old Mosaic Covenant.  Instead of inscribing his law upon tablets of stone as in the Mosaic Covenant, God would write his law upon the hearts of men.  Jesus said at the last supper, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood.”  — (Luke 22:20)

In the holy Bible, in the book of Matthew

Read the 18th chapter in the 21st verse

Jesus plainly tells us that we must have mercy

There’s a special warning in the 35th verse

Oh, you don’t love God

If you don’t love your neighbor

If you gossip about him, if you never have mercy

If he gets into trouble, and you don’t try to help him

Then you don’t love your neighbor

And you don’t love God.

neighbor_slide_title

You may well ask, Well “Who is my neighbor?”  Jesus answered this question in his story about the Good Samaritan.  Jesus tells the parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:29–37) and makes it clear in this parable that our neighbor is anyone around us, regardless of their ethnic, religious, or socio-economic status.  I have a T-Shirt that I like which reads, “God Bless Everyone:  No Exceptions.”  I have had many people come up to me and tell me how much they like this blessing.

the good samaritanI have another T-Shirt where I list the “No Exceptions” groups that somehow seem to be conveniently overlooked by many Cultural Christians.  The major fallacy that many Christians seem to observe is to define their neighbors as either someone in their own church or in their own social group.  When Jesus included the Samaritans who were an outcast group at the time as his neighbors, this should have made it clear that you must go beyond your tribe or friends to include other nations, other ethnicities, other religions, and other people with different beliefs as your neighbor.

There’s a God Almighty, and you’ve got to love him

If you want salvation and a home on high

If you say you love him while you hate your neighbor

Then you don’t have religion, you just told a lie

Oh, you don’t love God

If you don’t love your neighbor.

Well, we are almost at the end of my story.  Not much else to say is there?”  Just one last thought to leave you with.  Please feel free to share this with others.

  • If you love things more than you love people,
  • if you love money more than you love people,
  • if you love ideology more than you love people,
  • if you love tv, gambling, sports, and movies more than you love people,
  • If you love drugs and alcohol more than you love people,
  • then I think Jesus would say that:
  • “You Don’t Love God.”

 My thanks to Rhonda Vincent for her song and the lyrics in this blog.  You may listen to her song at:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IR2rpVd5Lwo