The older I get, the less I know. Isn’t it supposed to work the other way around? A friend of mine, Jerry, gave me this quote from Bertrand Russell the other day “The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.” The Greek philosopher Socrates was once proclaimed to the wisest man in the world. The day before he died, Socrates declared that he knew nothing. On that same day, the Oracle at Delphi was asked “Who is the wisest man in the world?” She replied “Socrates is the wisest man in the world.” This was reported back to Socrates who said “When I was young, I knew everything but now I know nothing.” The Oracle, who was never wrong, was asked “How can Socrates be the wisest man in the world when he knows nothing?” She replied “Only the wisest man in the world would know that he knows nothing and have the courage and humility to admit it.”
We go to school to learn many facts and figures. We study history to learn the story of humanity, we study physics to learn the theory of the cosmos, we study biology to learn how animals grow and develop and we study science so we will know how the world really works. We learn more and more and are coerced into theories and opinions and positions. We become more and more certain that we are wiser and smarter.
The more degrees that are conferred on us, the smarter we are supposed to be. If we are really smart, we begin to feel that all of these facts and data bits are not really helping us to understand the world. The older most of us get and the more learned most of us become, the more we suspect that there are no truths to the world. We begin to see that there are always truths behind the truths that we think we have found. Our profundities become curiosities as we age until at some point they wither away and become obsolete. How many theories have you seen that were proven wrong? How many times have you had to eat humble pie because something you were absolutely positively sure about was proven conclusively wrong?
I remember seeing a picture in the paper the other day of a man accused of sexually molesting a young girl. He was accused of pedophilia and charged with a felony offense. I took one look at the visage staring out of the paper at me and promptly proclaimed “If there were ever a guy who was a pedophile, he sure is.” A few weeks later, a more complete investigation proved him completely innocent of all offenses and the young girl admitted that she made the story up for some unknown reason. I was beyond having egg on my face. You would think that at my age, I would have learned to avoid a rush to judgment. I can make no excuses for my blatant stupidity.
Every few months, the media finds some new tragedy or murder case to focus on. A few years ago it was the Trayvon Martin case. It seemed that every day we were confronted with some new facts that supported a change in who the media wanted us to think was guilty. Trayvon initiated the encounter. Zimmerman initiated the encounter. Trayvon provoked Zimmerman. Zimmerman provoked Trayvon. Trayvon was a good kid. Zimmerman was a good guy loved by all of his friends. Trayvon was a racist. Zimmerman was a racist.
Tapes, witnesses, photo enlargements, medical information, acoustic information, video tapes, the entire gamut was presented daily with one expert after another telling us what they think. This same scenario plays itself out over and over again in the media. The “crime of the century” has been replaced by the “crime of the week.”
Each day regardless of what news we read or what cable show we watch, it appears we know more and more about less and less. What are we doing here folks? Are they looking for truth or are they selling papers? Are we voyeurs to some weird witch hunt? Are we taking sides so we can become right? If so, we will truly have become a Roman Circus instead of a civilized society of laws and courts and presumptions of innocence until proven guilty.
If we can somehow get pass this media circus that pretends to convey the truth, there are lessons that we need to learn. If you remember the famous story Rashomon, you may realize that truth is often a matter of perspective and not hard cold facts.
Time for Questions:
What can you help do to overcome the types of bias and prejudice that the media often promotes? How can you avoid your own “rush to judgment?” What does it mean to “judge not others, less you be judged yourself.” How often do we see the mote in others eyes but ignore the pole in our own?
Life is just beginning.
“We live in a culture where everyone’s opinion, view, and assessment of situations and people spill across social media, a lot of it anonymously, much of it shaped by mindless meanness and ignorance.” — Mike Barnicle
Mar 04, 2019 @ 11:22:17
Some important points and questions, John. I’m reading Steven Pinker’s latest book right now, Enlightenment Now, and he’s helping me with some of those very questions.
LikeLike
Mar 06, 2019 @ 09:25:54
Hi Jane, yes, in this age of fake news and hyper information, truth is a formidable adversary or perhaps more like an elusive prey. It seemed easy one time to say we wanted facts and information to prove or understand something. However, it is not easy to determine what is valid and what is false and what we think we know when we really do not know. I will have to look for Pinker’s book. I have used his TED talks in my classes many times. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLike