Why A Gun Will Not Make You Safer!

guns

Every gun sold in America makes you less safe than you were the minute before that gun was sold.  The gun lobbies and Second Amendment devotees want you to believe the opposite.  There are two motives for this.  One is to sell more guns.  This is a motive for the gun lobbyists, gun manufacturers and NRA.  The second motive is by the Second Amendment advocates who seriously believe that guns will protect you from “bad” guys with a gun.  This is wishful thinking which more often than not is false.  However, there are many cases on record where guns have protected people from criminals and other deviants.  Nevertheless, statistically speaking, you are not safer with more guns.  In fact, you are less safe as each gun sale adds to the growing epidemic of gun violence in USA America.  You will only be safer when there are less guns to be had for sale.  The argument I am going to present will clearly prove my point.  However, before I present it let me state the following truths.

  • I am a gun owner
  • I am a military veteran
  • I actually like guns, knives, and other weapons (nunchakus, hunting bows, etc.)
  • I have hunted moose, seal, elk, pheasant, and deer
  • I do believe that some guns should be available for hunting and sports shooting

So, why do I believe that more guns lead to more school shootings, massacres, homicides, suicides, and other violence?  Why do I think that we need to seriously dial back on the following three aspects of guns?

  • Gun availability
  • Gun lethality
  • Gun carry

To understand why more guns are dangerous, we must first start with understanding human psychology.  You will accept that anger is a normal human emotion.  Assuming a bell-shaped curve of ranges for anger, some people will get much angrier than others.  Some people will resort to violence, road rage, domestic abuse, fights, etc. when they are angry.  Let us assume that one percent of people sometimes fall into the “extreme” anger range.  Thus, out of 1,000,000 people, there will be 10,000 people who may become violently angry at some perceived slight, disrespect, or abuse.

young-girl-firing-two-gunsNext, let us establish a lethality of weapons.  I will put it thus:  fists are not as lethal as brass knuckles.  Brass knuckles are not as lethal as clubs.  Clubs are not as lethal as knives.  Knives are not as lethal as guns.  Handguns are not as lethal as rifles.  The range of lethality that I have noted is “most” often true but there are always exceptions.  Thus, I will say again, the lethality of the potential weapons structure I have described is most often the case but not always.

Now, let us assume that one percent of the people who fall into the “extreme” violent range might act out using a weapon of some sort.  That would mean that during any particular episode of extreme anger, a hundred people or one percent of 10,000 people could conceivably pick up a gun to use as a weapon.

5310758_052119-wtvd-charlotte-kids-learn-to-shoot-vid

If we take the fact that there are 257,000,000 people over the age of 18 in the USA as of 2020 (Annie E. Casey Foundation Data Center), then extrapolating from the one million people we started with, we would have to multiply the 100 potentially violent and angry people who might use a gun by the percentage of gun owners in America who have a gun available.  According to a Pew Study, four-in-ten U.S. adults say they live in a household with a gun, including 30% who say they personally own one.

So, we need to multiply as follows:

257,000,000 million adults over the age of 18 in the USA

X

30 Percent of adults who personally own a gun in the USA

X

100 potentially very angry people per every million adults who might be tempted to use a gun

257,000,000 x .30 = 77.1 million X 100 per million = 7710

That gives us the following:  7710 potentially very angry people on any given day who might use a gun in some act of violence.  Now let’s half that number since women are not usually as violent as men and we arrive at the following figure of 3855 adult men in the USA who might go berserk, grab a gun, and enter what domestic abuse counselors call the “Cycle of Violence.”

0201aa_7b79899f47f14b6ab14fb1ed7b3e0571_mv2

The “Cycle of Violence” can be described as follows:

“The term cycle of violence refers to repeated and dangerous acts of violence as a cyclical pattern, associated with high emotions and doctrines of retribution or revenge.  The pattern, or cycle, repeats and can happen many times during a relationship.  Each phase of the cycle may last a different length of time, and over time the level of violence may increase.  It often refers to violent behavior learned as a child, and then repeated as an adult, therefore continuing on in a perceived cycle.”WIKI

maxresdefaultThis cycle explains quite well what happens in many cases of gun violence or other types of violent outburst.  In phase two, tensions are building up.  This could be from a variety of different causes.  It might be strains from the work place or strains from home relationships with family and children.  The strains are often cumulative particularly with people who may lack the ability or means to discharge their stress.  The stress builds up until the individual finally explodes.  The explosion could be in words or actions.  Actions might involve throwing things, punching things, hitting things or various levels of assault against things or people using a wide range of weapons.

download (1)Phase three is the incident itself.  A trigger is needed to set the individual off.  Perhaps the individual gets fired or their spouse asks for a divorce.  Maybe they have a fight with a neighbor, or a car cuts them off at an intersection.  When the trigger occurs, the individual explodes.  The explosion could involve a violent attack that might go from simple threats or curses all the way to shooting someone.  The availability of weapons will play a major role in the level of violence.  This is one reason why a “waiting period” for purchasing a firearm makes  a lot of sense.  In two recent mass shootings, there was no waiting period for the purchase of a high-powered rifle and the individuals engaged in shooting massacres within a week of buying their rifles.

Phase four is a down period or a period of extreme remorse.  The violent individual feels a deep sense of guilt or regret and longs for forgiveness and to makeup to their victim for their transgressions.  If their victim is still alive they will apologize profusely and swear to never do it again.  They will promise anything to make amends and obtain forgiveness.  Obviously, if their victim or victims are dead, one act that they can take to escape their feelings of remorse is to end their own lives.  This explains why so many of these mass shooters commit suicide before they are apprehended.

nssfjan21x1

If the violent individual makes it through phase four and is still alive, there will be a phase of calm and peacefulness.  It will seem like everything is going to be okay.  Phase one may last days or weeks but unless the individual receives some type of therapy, the tensions will inevitably build up again.  The result will be another explosion after another triggering event takes place.  This is how the cycle of violence works over and over again.

The result of this anger cycle combined with an easy access to guns is an epidemic of gun violence.  It is an epidemic that includes nearly 25,000 suicides a year and about 14,000 homicides a year.  There are clearly only two solutions to reducing this death rate.  One solution would be to reduce the potential number of people in our society who are prone to violent outbursts or what some might label as mental illness.  The second solution would be to reduce the number of guns available or at least make it more difficult to obtain a gun when someone has a violent outburst.

downloadMany anti-gun control people push the solution that more mental health is needed.  The problem with this solution is that anger and angry outbursts are as normal in the population as mom, God, and apple pie.  There is no way to treat all the people in America who might lose their temper on a given day.  There is no way to tell when or where these outbursts will take place.  Therapy for “normal” people is not on the radar.  Make no mistake, your best friend, your neighbor, your cousin just might “lose” it tomorrow and go on some type of violent jag that results in death for someone else.  It happens all the time.  The papers are full of reports of people who lose it and end up killing their loved ones and themselves.

20150404_USD000_0The other solution is to reduce the availability or the lethality of guns in society.  This solution makes the most sense.  We can somewhat reduce the availability of weapons through background checks, waiting periods, age restrictions, gun training, and reducing the ability to carry a gun in public.  We must get rid of these ridiculous concealed carry laws.  It should be illegal to carry a gun in public concealed or otherwise unless you have a permit with a valid reason for why you need to carry a gun.

1999-_Gun-related_deaths_USAWe can reduce the lethality of guns by limiting clip capacities and by eliminating rifles that were designed for military purposes and not hunting.  Why anyone would need a rifle with more than a three round capacity is beyond me.  Rifles should be for hunting or target shooting and nothing else.  Any game that you are hunting will be gone long before you can chamber and fire your third round.  A .223 caliber was first designed for the military in Vietnam.  I had to qualify on an M-16 in 1965 when they were first issued.  It was like shooting a bb gun.  Easy to shoot with a round that was designed to wound and not kill.  They said this would take two or more people out of the war instead of just one dead body.  The individual shot by a .223 would be severely wounded and would need someone to take him back to a medic or out of the war zone.  Read any of the gun magazines today and it looks like they are selling guns and accessories to someone who is going to war.  Helmets, bullet proof vests, high-capacity magazines, laser sights and guns more fit for killing humans than hunting are touted and readily available.

_124922926_guns_flag976

I don’t deny that it would be difficult to make some distinctions between a military or assault rifle and a rifle that could be used for hunting.  It some cases it would be like trying to differentiate between tweedle dee and tweedle dum.  However difficult it might be, it could be done as long as two reasonable people could agree on the definitions.  No definition will convince or persuade everyone.  We must not let perfection stop us from trying to protect the lives of our children and our citizens.  If some mistakes are made in banning guns that are best designed for killing then so be it.  We will all be better off for it.   It is the only solution that will end the epidemic of gun violence in the USA.

PS

I think my theory above accounts for a large percentage of mass murders and some suicides. I know that a small percentage of mass murders are committed by individuals with a grudge against another group, ethnicity or race. Call them racists or ideological nut cases. I doubt they go through any “cycle of violence” such as I have described. My guess is that they develop some screwball theory and believe that their violence will help them wipeout whatever group they harbor negative attitudes against. Their hatred could be political, racial, or other wacko ideologies.

As for suicides, the major reason for suicides according to the mental health literature (retreatbehavioralhealth.com) is due to depression. Women tend to overdose with pills while men tend to use a handgun. Gun checks, gun licenses, gun waiting periods are probably not going to reduce deaths by suicide substantially since I cannot imagine how a background check or a license would stop someone who is depressed from owning a gun. Nevertheless, the easy availability of guns and their lethality does make them very dangerous for anyone suffering from depression.

Bring Back Legalized Dynamite!  Fight Crime!  End Violence in the Streets!

dynamite bomb isolated on white

dynamite bomb isolated on white

How many of you remember the good old days in America?  When dynamite was legal and you could carry it in your bib overalls?  When men were men and women were women and Blacks stayed on their side of the street.  There was no such thing as a minority and you could still smoke a good cigar anyplace you wanted to.

Once upon a time, it was legal to carry dynamite but then the government do-gooders decided to take our dynamite away.  The faggot pinko commie intellectual commie pinko faggot government bureaucrats decided that the common people should not be allowed to carry dynamite.  These 2nd Amendment deniers and dynamite control advocates pushed the US Congress to pass a bill that would heavily regulate dynamite in all fifty states.  It was a bad day for 2nd Amendment advocates and responsible dynamite owners.  The ADA (America Dynamite Association) did their best to prevent the passing of this bill.

“Those who use the sword will die by the sword. Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword.”  Matthew 26:52

she-s-dynamite-costumeThe ADA started a national campaign to protect our Second Amendment rights.  They sent out millions of flyers to alert the common people to the fact that their rights were being taken away.  The flyers said “When dynamite is allowed, only outlaws will have dynamite.” This slogan became the rallying cry for advocates of legalized dynamite throughout the nation.  It was also widely proclaimed that “dynamite saves lives” and that homes which were protected by dynamite were 75% less likely to be invaded.  Alas, it did no good.  Even with the support of many Republicans, Right Wing Talk show hosts and several noted cowboy actors, the bill was approved and dynamite became a federally regulated substance.

“I go out to buy a gun to make my family safer.  This way I can protect them from crooks, burglars, bad guys, drug addicts, rapists, minorities, illegal immigrants, terrorists and anyone who wants what I have.  Sounds like a good idea right?” 

Today, dynamite is so heavily regulated that you cannot simply go into a hardware store to get your dynamite anymore.  We can see the negative effects of this regulation everywhere.  Here are some examples.

Fishing and Hunting

accidents-18You can no longer use dynamite while fishing or hunting.  Once upon a time, every fisherman and hunter carried a stick of dynamite with them.  All you had to do was simply drop a stick of dynamite into your nearby lake and you could get as many trophy fish as your boat could carry.  Deer kills have also gone down.  It was a lot easier to get your deer limit with dynamite.  You would just wait in your deer stand until a herd of deer came by and while they were gathered around your salt lick, you could drop a stick of dynamite into the middle of the gathering and you would get two or three deer with a single blast.  They have taken all the fun and sport out of fishing and hunting.

“Except for one thing!  My wife now needs to buy a gun to be safer as well.  Do you know why? Well, more wives are shot by their husbands then by strangers or terrorists or minorities or psychopaths, unless you want to count husbands who murder their wives as psychopaths.” 

Parties and July 4th Celebrations

But even worse and more intrusive in respect to our 2nd Amendment rights, you can no longer use dynamite at your local 4th of July celebration or your child’s birthday party.  Kids all over America are now deprived of their basic rights to see a mega-blast at their parties and family celebrations.  Now they have to settle for those wimped up things that they call fireworks today. Believe me when I say, the old dynamite did a much better job than these stupid sparklers and bottle rockets.

Crime and Punishment

duckyousucker_610_407shar_s_c1Finally, it is a well-known fact that since dynamite has become federally regulated crime has gone up, abortions have gone up, divorce has gone up and less people are now going to church on Sunday.   I have interviewed many experts from the ADA over this subject and most tell me that the problems in America seemed to start with the regulation of dynamite.  More Americans now feel less protected on the streets at night without their dynamite.  There once was a time when people could walk the streets at night, comfortable with the fact that no one would bother them because they carried their dynamite in a well concealed spot.  Today, crooks no longer fear dynamite.  The average citizen has been left naked and vulnerable to the deprivations and assault of any would be criminal.

Send two dollars to the ADA to help fight dynamite control.

Time for Questions:

Do you belong to the NDA?  Why Not?  Are you pro or con dynamite control?  What do you think society would be like if everyone could carry concealed dynamite?  What about our 2nd Amendment rights?

Life is just beginning.

First they start with dynamite and before you know it they will be banning p-shooters and water pistols.

%d bloggers like this: