What’s the difference between someone who can speak but does not speak and someone who cannot speak?
NADA.
Perhaps, like the difference between someone who can read but does not read and someone who cannot read. No difference.
Can you speak but you remain silent?
Can you see injustice, but you say nothing?
Can you see cruelty to others, but you utter not a sound?
John Stuart Mill: “Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
Martin Luther King Jr.: The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people, but the silence over that by the good people.
Desmond Tutu: “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”
Ella Wheeler Wilcox: “To sin by silence, when we should protest, makes cowards of men.”
Elie Wiesel: “I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.”
Yesterday, I was listening to NPR, and host Scott Tong spoke with Mr. Viles Dorsainvil about the fear and coping mechanisms within the Haitian community in Springfield, Ohio. The Core Issue: Following a Supreme Court decision allowing the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for more than 300,000 Haitians, local community members have been summoned to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility. Individuals reporting to these appointments are being outfitted with electronic ankle and wrist monitors, generating deep concern that this serves as the immediate next step toward mass deportation.
Pastor Viles Dorsainvil is a Moravian pastor, missionary, and co-founder and executive director of the Haitian Community Help & Support Center in Springfield, Ohio. Pastor Dorsainvil acts as an advocate and support for the Haitian community.
Towards the end of the interview, Pastor Dorsainvil was asked, “Are you not afraid to speak out in support of these people.”
He replied “Yes, of course I am. But someone must be the Voice for the Voiceless.”
That comment was the inspiration for this blog. Voices for the Voiceless. Heros and Heroines who speak out when silence is deafening and words can lead to unspeakable atrocities. Herewith are some short stories and bios of men and women who became the Voice for the Voiceless.
Vernon Dahmer (1908–1966)
Mississippi businessman and voting-rights activist
Dahmer was a successful Black businessman in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, who repeatedly encouraged African Americans to register to vote despite Klan intimidation. Most strikingly, he publicly announced that people who could not afford their poll tax could come to his store and he would pay it for them.
Dahmer was a member of Shady Grove Baptist Church where he was a music director and Sunday School teacher. He was also the owner of a grocery store, sawmill, planning mill, and cotton farm. As he described it, his main objective was to make a living for himself and to provide work for somebody else. He would hire local individuals from the community to work for him and did not discriminate between black or white.
The Ku Klux Klan retaliated against Vernon for trying to organize Black voters by firebombing his home in January 1966. Vernon fought the attackers while his family escaped the burning house.
He died the next day from his injuries. A congressional history specifically records that he was killed after offering to collect poll taxes so that his neighbors would not have to go to the courthouse themselves.
Viola Liuzzo (1925–1965)
Detroit mother of five who went to Selma
After watching television coverage of Bloody Sunday in Selma, 39-year-old Viola Liuzzo left her home in Michigan and drove to Alabama to help the civil-rights movement. She participated in the Selma-to-Montgomery campaign and transported marchers.
On March 25, 1965, she was driving a young Black activist, Leroy Moton, when Klansmen pursued their car and shot her to death. The National Park Service describes her as having “gave her life for the cause of civil rights.”
Growing up, her family was very poor and lived in one-room shacks with no running water. The schools Liuzzo attended did not have adequate supplies, and teachers had little time to deal with the many children in need. Because the family moved so often, Liuzzo usually began and ended the year in different schools. Having been poor in Tennessee for much of her childhood and adolescence, she was close to the racially segregated nature of the South. Her views on injustice had a powerful influence on her activism.
Emma Beatrice Tenayuca (1916–1999)
Mexican American labor organizer from San Antonio
Tenayuca began protesting injustice while still a teenager. At 16 she joined striking women workers; at 21 she became a leader of the enormous 1938 San Antonio pecan-shellers strike. The workers—predominantly Mexican and Mexican American—were among the poorest-paid laborers in America.
She was born into a Mexican American family, and their lineage in South Texas predated both Mexican independence and the Mexican–American War. The Tenayuca family were hit hard by the Depression, and all around her, Emma began to see the suffering of low class workers
But the episode that puts her in “Voices for the Voiceless” came in 1939.
San Antonio was a major hub of the pecan industry, partially due to the use of Mexican workers as a cheap source of labor. In 1938, thousands of San Antonio pecan-shellers started a spontaneous strike in protest of poor working conditions, with Tenayuca serving as the strike committee chair.
Tenayuca was preparing to speak at a political meeting in San Antonio when a hostile crowd of roughly 5,000 surrounded the auditorium and then stormed the building. She had to be smuggled to safety through an underground tunnel. Death threats eventually forced her to leave San Antonio.
Rev. James Reeb (1927–1965)
Unitarian minister who answered King’s call to Selma
James Reeb is another remarkable but comparatively forgotten figure.
James Joseph Reeb was an American Unitarian Universalist minister, pastor, and activist during the civil rights movement in Washington, D.C., and Boston, Massachusetts
After Bloody Sunday, Martin Luther King Jr. called upon clergy from around the country to come to Selma. Reeb went.
While participating in the Selma to Montgomery marches actions in Selma, Alabama, in 1965, he was murdered by white segregationists and white supremacists.
On March 9, 1965, after participating in the civil-rights demonstrations, Reeb and two other ministers ate at a restaurant serving African Americans. After leaving, they were attacked by white segregationists. Reeb was struck in the head with a club and died two days later. He was 38 and had a wife and four children. Three men were tried for Reeb’s murder but were acquitted by an all-white jury. His murder remains officially unsolved.
Another quote I like is “The test of courage comes when we are in the minority. The test of tolerance comes when we are in the majority. “ — by Ralph W. Sockman
Looking at these individuals who became voices for the voiceless, I am struck by something else. The people who threatened, attacked and murdered them generally acted with the support—or at least the acquiescence—of the surrounding majority. There was little courage in that.
It takes very little courage to shout when the crowd is shouting with you.
Courage begins when you are willing to stand apart from the crowd.
Inner Versus Outer
I began this essay with Pastor Dorsainvil’s remark:
“Someone must be the voice for the voiceless.”
There are so many of these unsung heroes like Pastor Dorsainvil that it is embarrassing to pick out only four. During the course of my life, I have come across dozens more men and women who faced their fears and showed us what integrity and courage mean in action.
That raises a larger question.
Why do some people risk their comfort, reputation, livelihood, and sometimes even their lives for people they don’t know?
And why do others remain silent?
A friend of mine describes part of the difference as inner versus outer orientation.
The distinction is certainly not absolute. Human beings are far too complicated to divide neatly into two boxes. Most of us contain some of both.
But the idea is useful.
An inner-oriented person derives meaning primarily from values that cannot easily be purchased: compassion, patience, mercy, kindness, integrity, community, spirituality, responsibility to others, and concern for the world we share.
An outer-oriented person is more likely to measure success through external evidence: money, property, status, achievement, recognition, possessions, power, and independence.
Neither orientation is entirely good or entirely bad. We need ambition. We need achievement. We need independence. Civilization would accomplish very little if nobody wanted to build anything, invent anything, earn anything, or succeed at anything.
The problem begins when outer success becomes the principal measure of human worth.
I asked my friend why so many people seem to be in such a hurry on the roads.
Speeding. Tailgating. Road rage. Passing dangerously. Honking half a second after the light turns green.
Where in God’s name is everybody going?
His answer was that this might be another manifestation of inner versus outer orientation.
The inner-oriented driver sees other people on the highway.
The extremely outer-oriented driver sees obstacles.
That may be an oversimplification, but I think there is something to it.
And it leads to another question:
Why does modern American society encourage so much outer-directed behavior?
One answer may be found in the economic system surrounding us.
I think this is one of the most interesting ways to examine capitalism—not simply as an economic system, but as a psychological system. A consumer economy does not merely satisfy existing needs; it also encourages, amplifies, and often manufactures desires.
I would distinguish at least 15 psychological drives:
- Security — We buy things that promise safety, stability, health, financial protection, and control over an uncertain future. Insurance, savings, homes, security systems, and warranties all appeal to this drive.
- Status — Consumption communicates where we believe we stand—or where we would like others to think we stand. Cars, clothing, homes, watches, vacations, neighborhoods, and educational credentials can become status markers.
- Social comparison — We judge what is “enough” partly by looking at other people. A perfectly adequate kitchen suddenly seems inadequate after seeing the neighbor’s remodeled kitchen. This connects strongly with what economists call relative consumption.
- Belonging — People buy things partly to become members of tribes: Harley riders, Apple users, golfers, sports fans, fashion groups, political groups, music subcultures. Products become badges of membership.
- Identity — Consumption helps answer the question, “Who am I?” We don’t simply buy hiking boots; we may buy the identity of being an outdoors person. We don’t merely purchase books; we surround ourselves with evidence that we are intellectuals.
- Novelty — Human beings are attracted to the new. The old phone may work perfectly well, but the new phone creates curiosity and excitement. Capitalism is exceptionally good at converting our attraction to novelty into repeated purchasing.
- Pleasure and sensory gratification — Food, alcohol, entertainment, travel, music, comfortable furniture, beautiful clothing, and countless other products appeal directly to our desire for enjoyment.
- Convenience and avoidance of effort — We have a powerful desire to save time and reduce inconvenience. Fast food, automobiles, dishwashers, delivery services, prepared meals, online shopping, and AI all capitalize on this.
- Control and autonomy — Ownership gives us a feeling of control. “My house, my car, my computer, my money.” Consumer capitalism often associates purchasing power with personal freedom: I can choose.
- Achievement — Acquiring things can become evidence that we have succeeded. The bigger house, promotion, expensive vacation, or luxury automobile can function almost like trophies.
- Fear of missing out (FOMO) — “Limited time only.” “Only three remaining.” “Everyone is talking about it.” Scarcity and social proof exploit our fear that other people are experiencing something from which we are excluded.
- Self-improvement — We continually purchase promises of becoming better versions of ourselves: exercise equipment, diets, books, courses, cosmetics, supplements, educational programs, productivity software. The underlying message is powerful: The person you are isn’t quite the person you could be.
- Sexual and romantic attraction — Advertising has exploited this almost since advertising began. Products become implicitly associated with attractiveness, desirability, youth, masculinity, femininity, romance, and sexual success.
- Reward and emotional regulation — “I’ve had a terrible day; I deserve this.” Shopping, eating, entertainment, travel, gambling, and other consumption can provide temporary relief from boredom, loneliness, frustration, or anxiety.
- Meaning and transcendence — This one is subtler. Consumption sometimes attempts to satisfy needs that aren’t fundamentally material at all: meaning, purpose, connection, beauty, adventure, even immortality. Travel can promise transformation; a luxury automobile can promise significance; a brand can promise membership in something larger than oneself.
And I would add one particularly important meta-drive:
The desire for “more”
This may be the psychological engine that a consumer capitalist economy depends upon most heavily. Perhaps underlying all fifteen is this sixteenth force: the desire for “more.”
A subsistence economy asks, “Do I have enough?” A consumer economy continually encourages us to ask, “What should I want next?” The system does not necessarily need to make people unhappy; it simply needs to maintain some distance between what we possess and what we desire. “Shop till you drop.” “He who has the most toys wins.” Perhaps America’s unofficial national anthem should be “Never Enough.”
Capitalism did not create most of these psychological drives. Status competition, sexual attraction, tribal belonging, novelty seeking, envy, security seeking, and acquisition existed long before modern capitalism. What consumer capitalism has accomplished extraordinarily well is attaching products and services to these ancient human impulses.
Religion tries to help us overcome these drives, but it fails dismally to compete with Madison Avenue.
In 2025, Americans donated an estimated $151.6 billion to religious organizations. That includes churches, synagogues, mosques, congregations and other organizations classified by Giving USA under “religion.” Religion remained the single largest category of American charitable giving, accounting for about 23% of charitable donations. —- The data comes from Giving USA 2026: The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2025, published by the Giving USA Foundation
Advertising is much larger. Estimates vary depending on exactly what is counted as advertising, but eMarketer projected total U.S. media advertising at roughly $400–422 billion for 2025. As a reality check, digital advertising alone generated $294.6 billion in U.S. revenue in 2025, according to the Interactive Advertising Bureau/PwC.
We go to church on Sunday,
We listen to the sermon about greed and love your neighbor,
We donate twenty dollars in the offering and then leave for the Mega Mall.
We buy the new Sony Play Station or iPhone, which are both on sale for only 650 dollars each.
Thus, the more interesting question may not be, “What psychological drives does capitalism create?” but rather, “Which existing human drives does consumer capitalism amplify, monetize, and sometimes manipulate?”
That avoids the simplistic conclusion that capitalism is inherently good or evil. Instead, it raises a systems question: What kinds of human behavior does our economic system encourage, reinforce, and reward?
And that brings us back to where we began.
Perhaps the struggle in America is not simply between liberal and conservative, Democrat and Republican, religious and secular, capitalist and socialist.
Perhaps beneath those arguments lies an older question:
What do I owe myself—and what do I owe other people?
Vernon Dahmer answered that question when he offered to pay the poll taxes of Black citizens who wanted to vote.
Viola Liuzzo answered it when she left her husband and five children in Michigan and drove to Alabama.
Emma Tenayuca answered it when she stood beside desperately poor workers even when thousands of people wanted to silence her.
James Reeb answered it when Martin Luther King Jr. called for clergy to come to Selma.
And Pastor Viles Dorsainvil is answering it today when he speaks for frightened people in Springfield, Ohio despite admitting that he, too, is afraid.
None of them were fearless.
That is the point.
Courage isn’t the absence of fear.
Courage is deciding that something else matters more than your fear.
So, the next time, someone honks at you because you have sat at the stop light too long, or the next time someone passes you on the right on a two lane road or they pass you on the left side with a solid yellow line, think about this concept of inner versus outer.
Have some sympathy for a driver who is only trying to get to the Mega Mall before the Sony Play Station sale ends.
What does anxiety and uncertainty have to do with planning? This is an important connection. Uncertainty in my opinion either causes or leads to anxiety. The more uncertain we are, the more anxious we become. Many people will not attempt new endeavors, leave home, eat new food, travel to new places, meet new people, take on adventures or worst of all “listen to new ideas.” The uncertainty of these efforts creates anxiety. The unknown consequences of doing something new brings some anxiety to most of us. Change and newness can impinge on our efforts to maintain equilibrium and homeostasis in our lives. New things can disrupt the natural order that we so carefully craft to protect ourselves, our family, and our identities. “What if” can bring fear and panic to even the most courageous of us.
However, when it comes to anxiety my solution is planning. Karen would say I plan too much. I don’t need to go raging into the night of old age, but I do not want to get in my crypt yet and turn off the lights. Life has a way of closing in on us. The curtains for each of us are indeed coming down and will someday be down for all of us, but we can slow their coming down. As we age, we must push back. Planning can help us to hold the curtains off for a little while longer. But remember, “Plans are nothing, but planning is everything.”
My theory is that I have been driven to reduce anxiety because I grew up with an abusive father. My childhood was a daily diet of fear and uncertainty as to when or how badly my father would fly off the handle and take it out on me. He might have had a bad day at the races, or something went wrong with his car, and it was all my fault. So many things became my fault that I was always looking up expecting the sky to fall on me. I looked under my bed and, in my closet, every night before going to sleep as a kid. Years later I would check under my car and in my back seat before getting in my vehicle. I never let anyone get on the inside track of me when walking down a sidewalk and I always look over my back when going to a public John. I am not paranoid, and I do not think anyone is out to get me. I simply want to be certain that I have an advantage just in case someone might be out to get me. 😊 Karen has learned to cope with my rather bizarre behavior and attributes it to my intrinsic anxiety.
Many of you reading this may remember the time when kids went to school by themselves. Saturday was a day for playing outside with your friends and your parents seldom carried a concealed weapon unless it was a paddle to spank your butt. Today, kids spend most days with helicopter parents, sanctioned after school sports leagues or at home playing video games. The sports field in our town of Frederic has a baseball field, volleyball court and four basketball courts. After twelve years of living in Frederic, I can only remember seeing a few volleyball games and baseball games played each summer. Most days, even when school was out, the baseball field and the volleyball field were deserted. The adjunct basketball courts were idle year-round. I do not ever remember seeing any kids playing a game on the basketball courts. 
I do not blame the victim for this “paranoia” for fear. We have a fear-based society where a paranoia for fear is hammered into us every day. Each day the radio, internet, TV, newspapers, and social media outlets blasts us with mind numbing stories that would scare Superwoman or Batman. It is no wonder that we have a fear-based society. We have a society that is not addicted to fear as much as it is fed fear. We eat a daily toxic brew of fear. A fear stew that is comprised of stories that seem horrible beyond comprehension. I could list a dozen from the past week, but what would be the point. You know them as well as I do. Whether they happened in Bangladesh, Spain, Mexico, or the USA, you will find out all about them in your local newspaper or evening cable news.
Next, let us establish a lethality of weapons. I will put it thus: fists are not as lethal as brass knuckles. Brass knuckles are not as lethal as clubs. Clubs are not as lethal as knives. Knives are not as lethal as guns. Handguns are not as lethal as rifles. The range of lethality that I have noted is “most” often true but there are always exceptions. Thus, I will say again, the lethality of the potential weapons structure I have described is most often the case but not always.
This cycle explains quite well what happens in many cases of gun violence or other types of violent outburst. In phase two, tensions are building up. This could be from a variety of different causes. It might be strains from the work place or strains from home relationships with family and children. The strains are often cumulative particularly with people who may lack the ability or means to discharge their stress. The stress builds up until the individual finally explodes. The explosion could be in words or actions. Actions might involve throwing things, punching things, hitting things or various levels of assault against things or people using a wide range of weapons.
Phase three is the incident itself. A trigger is needed to set the individual off. Perhaps the individual gets fired or their spouse asks for a divorce. Maybe they have a fight with a neighbor, or a car cuts them off at an intersection. When the trigger occurs, the individual explodes. The explosion could involve a violent attack that might go from simple threats or curses all the way to shooting someone. The availability of weapons will play a major role in the level of violence. This is one reason why a “waiting period” for purchasing a firearm makes a lot of sense. In two recent mass shootings, there was no waiting period for the purchase of a high-powered rifle and the individuals engaged in shooting massacres within a week of buying their rifles.
Many anti-gun control people push the solution that more mental health is needed. The problem with this solution is that anger and angry outbursts are as normal in the population as mom, God, and apple pie. There is no way to treat all the people in America who might lose their temper on a given day. There is no way to tell when or where these outbursts will take place. Therapy for “normal” people is not on the radar. Make no mistake, your best friend, your neighbor, your cousin just might “lose” it tomorrow and go on some type of violent jag that results in death for someone else. It happens all the time. The papers are full of reports of people who lose it and end up killing their loved ones and themselves.
The other solution is to reduce the availability or the lethality of guns in society. This solution makes the most sense. We can somewhat reduce the availability of weapons through background checks, waiting periods, age restrictions, gun training, and reducing the ability to carry a gun in public. We must get rid of these ridiculous concealed carry laws. It should be illegal to carry a gun in public concealed or otherwise unless you have a permit with a valid reason for why you need to carry a gun.
We can reduce the lethality of guns by limiting clip capacities and by eliminating rifles that were designed for military purposes and not hunting. Why anyone would need a rifle with more than a three round capacity is beyond me. Rifles should be for hunting or target shooting and nothing else. Any game that you are hunting will be gone long before you can chamber and fire your third round. A .223 caliber was first designed for the military in Vietnam. I had to qualify on an M-16 in 1965 when they were first issued. It was like shooting a bb gun. Easy to shoot with a round that was designed to wound and not kill. They said this would take two or more people out of the war instead of just one dead body. The individual shot by a .223 would be severely wounded and would need someone to take him back to a medic or out of the war zone. Read any of the gun magazines today and it looks like they are selling guns and accessories to someone who is going to war. Helmets, bullet proof vests, high-capacity magazines, laser sights and guns more fit for killing humans than hunting are touted and readily available.
The research that purports to explain the Trump phenomenon almost never goes beyond the “Right Wing” narratives for Trumps election. These narratives all point to abortion, guns, taxes, small government, immigration and jobs as the key factors in Trumps victory. Trump blames the Democrats for everything wrong in rural America and the Republicans have provided a compelling set of schemes that have convinced many in rural America that a partial solution to their problems lies in more capitalism. 
Aging Capriciously 