Diversity is the most beautiful thing in the world. If you can suspend your judgements and look at the world through the perspective of diversity, you will be treated to a kaleidoscope of colors, patterns, habits, traditions, ideas, beliefs, and stories. You will see a world that is complex beyond belief. A world that no artist or musician or writer could even begin to describe. Take away diversity and the world is a grey amalgam of people who look alike, think alike, and act alike. Diversity makes the world interesting and challenging.
For some, diversity conjures up the idea of race. Many people think of diversity only in terms of race or gender. I remember when I used to facilitate leadership teams and project teams. I would use the Myer Briggs Personality Inventory to balance out specific psychological characteristics for my teams. My primary thought was that we needed a balance of viewpoints and ways of looking at problems. The Myer Briggs rated people on 4 scales that included: introversion versus extraversion, thinking versus feeling, perceiving versus judging and concrete orientation versus sensing orientation. I wanted to ensure that I had a diversity of thinking styles and not just gender or ethnic diversity.
There are many kinds of diversity. Scientists have shown that the concept of race is not very scientific. I shall call the various skin colors in the human race as pigmentation diversity. We can also have cultural or ethnic diversity, intellectual diversity, gender diversity and religious diversity. Each of the aforementioned types of diversity can add flavor and spice to life, IF and that is the big issue IF. IF, you are open minded to the differences in the human race, diversity can be a blessing. However, diversity can be a two-edged sword. By its very nature, diversity tends to be exclusive rather than inclusive. Many people think that they are superior to others because of some attribute that they possess.
Some types of diversity are more exclusionary than others. Income diversity, political diversity, education diversity and pigmentation diversity have led many people to unsubstantiated feelings of superiority. Rich people may feel that they are superior to poor people. Light skinned people may feel superior to darker skinned people. More educated people may feel superior to less educated people. The beauty of diversity gets twisted around like a pretzel until it is no longer recognizable. It is hard to grasp the fact that some people are opposed to diversity and prefer to live among people who are exactly like them. For these humans, diversity is something that they would eliminate from their lives. The concept that “variety is the spice of life” fails to inspire those who think that they may have to share the world with people who are different.
There are too many people who do not understand the distinction between the concepts of difference and deficit. Diversity is always a difference. A deficit is something that is inferior to something else. Only fools make the claim that diversity and deficits are the same. Rich people are not better than poor people. Educated people are not more intelligent than less educated people. Lighter skinned people are not superior to darker skinned people.
The words better, intelligent and superior have no causal relationship to groups of people. People have a wide range of knowledge, skills, and abilities but none of these have been inextricably linked to color, gender, education, income, culture, religion, or numerous other aspects of diversity. Of course there are some characteristics (particularly age) that can be linked to physical abilities but to assume that all younger people are better than all older people when it comes to physical abilities would be meaningless. It would certainly not be a bias that anyone would choose to use for excluding older people from the human race. I am thinking of the movie “Soylent Green” where older people were turned into food for the younger people when they were deemed too old to be useful to society.
When it comes to diversity, only the Vulcans had it right. Their IDIC principle stood for “Infinite Diversity through Infinite Combination.” The history of humanity exhibits a love hate affair with diversity. The world is divided up by culture, ethnicity, religion, tribes, clans, and castes. “Mine is better than yours” could be the motto for the human race. My god, my religion, my skin color, my beliefs. Small wonder that so many tragedies are brought on by our small-minded beliefs.
Never before in history have we seen such stupidity and narrow mindedness circling the globe. Stupidity and intelligence are two very different things. In the past four years, I have witnessed stupidity among many highly intelligent and accomplished individuals. Stupidity is a lack of breadth and depth when looking at the world. When one only sees the benefits of their own tribe and sees the differences of other tribes as a deficit that is stupidity. Two major factors account for much of the misery facing humanity today.
The first factor that is driving volatility and unrest in many parts of the world is the availability of low cost and relatively high-speed transportation. We are now capable of mixing the world with one big stirring spoon. People have been warned in the USA that in so many years, white people will no longer be the majority. This is perceived as a threat. Elsewhere in the world, countries are facing a dilution of their traditional populations due to both forced and chosen migrations. People who have lived with the “same” neighbors for years are now threatened by people of different backgrounds. In the US, we have seen a huge increase in “gated” communities. “Let’s keep out anyone who is different!” Data from one survey in 2015 showed nearly 11 million Americans living in gated communities. This number has surely increased dramatically in the past seven years. Borders may serve the same purpose. A large number of American citizens supported Trump’s building a border wall with Mexico.
One pundit asked and answered the question: “Why does America have so many gated communities?”
“Gated Communities are mainly successful because millions of Americans tend to seek happiness in their way of life. Many of them are willing to pay a high price to live their own American dream while isolating themselves into artificial perfection with people and rules they chose.”
The second factor driving much of the unrest in the world has been the availability of low-cost communication systems that are capable of both uniting and dividing cultures the world over. The Internet and the cellphone are tools that can be used to improve the world. They can be used to help people understand and appreciate the differences that exist in the world. However, they can also be used to create greater animosity and divisiveness throughout the world. People who are afraid of change and fear differences are much more likely to resort to media that allows them to join tribes of like-minded people. Instead of becoming tools to improve civilization, the Internet and cellphones are used to destroy civilization. By spreading misinformation, disinformation, and distortions, modern media has encouraged a negative rather than a positive view of diversity.
Much of what I am saying is not new. These characteristics of bigoty, ethnocentricity, xenophobia and racism have always been part of humanity. When we mix fear and greed in the “melting pot”, and give pathways to these attributes, the result is violence and devastation.
On a minor scale think of a sporting event where people adopt an “identify” based on some misguided loyalty or egoistic need to a particular team. The Packer fans sit on one side of the football stadium while the Viking fans sit on the other side. The Japanese sit on one side of the soccer stadium and the South Koreans sit on the other side. The Indians sit on one side of the cricket stadium and the Pakistanis sit on the other side. Each side cheers the scoring and plays of “their” team while booing the plays of the other team. When things don’t go well for one side, the result may be violence off the field as well as on it. Soccer has a well-deserved record of riots and hooliganism. I tried to count the number of soccer riots and lost count. Hardly any sport in the world has been immune from instances of violence and mayhem. People don’t enjoy having their “identity” defiled by being part of a losing team.
I mentioned that “sports” is a minor scale event compared to events concerning religion, culture, politics, or economics. Just imagine the potential for violence when Muslims versus Christians or Communists versus Capitalists or Democrats versus Republicans. The amazing thing is that the world is not less civilized than it currently is. People in the USA today bemoan the divisiveness in politics as something seemingly new. I submit it is not new but that it has become more evident with the Internet and media. The media love to hype every event to the nth degree in hopes of selling more advertisement. Due to the numerous channels of communication that distort and bias events according to the prejudices of the perceiver, we now have chasms of truth, glaciers of lies and mountains of deceitfulness. Stupidity and intolerance are beyond the pandemic stage and have become endemic the world over. We have more to fear from bigotry than we do from the Corona virus.
How can we learn to see beauty in diversity? How do we hope to overcome the ugliness that some people see in the differences that exist in the human race? Can we convince people that a difference is not a deficit? I think of words like tolerance, respect, understanding, open-mindedness, progressive, merciful, kindhearted, loving, and compassionate. Is it too much to expect that we can show these later attributes to people who are different? If we could only extend these thoughts to people who do not belong to our tribe, we could change the world.
“Until the philosophy which holds one race superior, and another inferior is finally and permanently discredited and abandoned, everywhere is war. And until there are no longer first-class and second-class citizens of any nation, until the color of a man’s skin is of no more significance than the color of his eyes and until the basic human rights are equally guaranteed to all without regard to race, there is war. And until that day, the dream of lasting peace, world citizenship, rule of international morality, will remain but a fleeting illusion to be pursued, but never attained… now everywhere is war.” ― Haile Selassie I, Selected Speeches
The abyss It is so big that there is no bridging it. None of the sides can see the other side. None of the sides has any common ground with the other side. None of the sides understands the language that the other side speaks. We might as well be earthlings talking to Martians. There is no lingua franca. Many of the “well-meaning” experts exhort both sides to try harder to bridge the gap or to work more diligently to listen to the other side. It seems to be assumed that all it will take to jump the gulf is good intentions. I cry bullshit on this. As the old aphorism goes, “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.” It will take more than good intentions to heal the wound that infests our country.
The wants advertised on the TV and in the media are never fulfilling. We have a nation of brainwashed consumers who mistakenly think that more toys, bigger houses, more guns, and luxury cars will make them happy. We are a nation on a never-ending treadmill of consumer materialism where like rats we keep spinning the wheel and hoping to find happiness, but happiness never comes, and drugs take its place. 
As the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, the tensions in society grow ever more divisive. We see more road rage, more senseless shootings, more violence between men and women, less loyalty between employers and employees. The underpinning of society that should be based on human integrity and morality is replaced with an opportunism based on an amoral value system. Whatever we can get as long as we break no laws is considered to be moral. We see most politicians that have no commitment to anything except to collect more money so that they can stay in office. Their highest goal is to help the rich get richer, which of course includes themselves. 
I am not talking about the devil here or about spirituality. I am talking about a kind of insidious propaganda that has been spread by many groups and individuals. In this propaganda, one side of America is labeled as moral, ethical, righteous, and just. The other side is the opposite. The other side is everything negative. The other side is a composite of all the demons and evils that Americans believe in. The other side are communists, fascists, atheists, anti-democratic, anti-patriotic and un-American. One side is good. The other side is evil incarnate. You cannot talk to evil. You cannot discuss with the devil why he wants your soul. You cannot debate with Satan over the values that he has. Heaven and hell do not have weekly discussion groups. The language heard today, and what the media publishes drips with hate, innuendo, and disdain. The language fosters violence. I doubt the Founding Fathers ever conceived that the First Amendment would protect such speech. There are three elements that contribute to a hate speech culture that demonizes the other side: 
Malicious labeling is the name calling that goes on between both sides today wherein each side is labeled. You can hear it on almost every talk show program in America today. Name calling and name labeling. Commie pinko leftists! Intellectual elites! Radical socialists! Racist rednecks! Fascist dictators! Politicians, commentators, newscasters, and radio talk show hosts all use malicious labels to insult and demean those they disagree with. What have we let this country become when we allow such name calling? This kind of hyperbole demonizes the other side and creates a divide that cannot be overcome by rational conversation.
I do not think that the Founding Fathers of our nation believed that Government was evil. Certainly, they felt that there could be too much government intrusion on the rights of the populace. They invoked certain safeguards to protect both human rights and states rights. Nevertheless, they did not demonize government and not a single one of the Fathers ever referred to government as evil. Edmund Burke, the famous English conservative said, “The government that governs best is the government that governs least.” He never said, “government was evil.” It has become common place to hear refrains denigrating the role and necessity of government. This steady drumbeat of antigovernmental rhetoric has created a group of people that have no value for government and who support the idea that government should be abolished.
A few years ago I began to wonder why groups like the KKK, Aryan Brotherhood, Antifa, The Proud Boys and many other such groups advocating violence against the government were not labeled as Terrorist Organizations. I asked a lawyer this question and he replied, “it is all politics.” I found that almost all the groups listed by the Southern Poverty Law Center as “hate groups” were designated as “extremist groups.” This means that they are not illegal, and they have the right to organize, march, rally and basically spread their hate across America. In 2019, The SPLC listed 940 hate groups across the USA. If any of these groups was labeled as a “Terrorist Group,” they would be on the same list as the Taliban, Boko Haram, The Mafia, Mexican Cartels and Al Qaeda. What is the difference between an extremist group and a terrorist group? It might surprise you to learn that a terrorist organization is defined as follows:
If this definition does not apply to the groups that tried to storm the US Capital on January 6th, 2021, I do not know what does. Just yesterday the Canadian government labeled the Proud Boys as a Terrorist Organization. This delegitimizes the group and takes their rights away. For Canada, it is a start. I am wondering when we are going to get started in the USA on such an effort. The First Amendment was never construed to allow hate speech and the advocating of violent actions to overthrow the government. Why do we not have the political will to outlaw these groups? We seem to have little compunction in penalizing Black groups like the Black Lives Matter Movement or the Black Panthers. We have a different standard when it comes to White Supremacy groups. 
The newspapers, TV and the Internet are today the major carriers for the hate and vituperation that has spread across America. On one side of the divide, we find the NY Times, the Washington Post and CNN News. On the other side, we find the NY Post, the Washington Examiner and Fox News. There are countless other purveyors of extreme and fanatical views. Each side reeks of headlines supporting nonobjective views and biased reporting. If objective reporting ever existed in the USA, it has been murdered and buried by the most pervasive media to ever exist. The media carries the hate and violence that is created by politicians, pundits, radio commentators and hate groups and ensures that it gets widely disseminated. Without the media, much of the divide would never have occurred. Hate needs a platform to be spread and the media is more than happy to host anything that it believes will sell itself and its advertising. 
I look around me today and I do not understand the world. I do not understand the decisions that our leaders make. It seems we have a moral disease. The symptoms of this disease are short-term thinking and greed. Arizona is suffering from an unprecedented drought and heat wave. The water levels in both the Central Arizona Project and aquifers are dangerously low. Yet when asked to cut back water usage by 3.8 percent, the golf course owners in Phoenix created an association to oppose such a “drastic” cut. Their counter proposal was for a 1.6 percent cut in water usage. The Governor of Arizona was the keynote speaker for the associations kick off meeting. Am I crazy? Do you believe this? Are golf courses more important than drinking water and water for farm crops?
Once upon a time I had more friends on Facebook. I had both Democratic friends, Republican Friends and friends who cared not one whit about politics. Many of all political persuasions were friends who simply wanted to ignore politics. During the run-up to Trump’s election, I discussed, debated, argued, reasoned and fought with many friends who wanted to support Trump. The results were not pretty. Zero changed their minds. I was angry and frustrated.
Aging Capriciously 