
Once upon a time there was a town that had a rat problem. It decided to hire a Pied Piper who could lure the rats away from town with his magic flute. Okay, you probably know the rest of the story. He got rid of the rats, but the town managers refused to pay him. So the Piper got out his magic flute and lured all the young children away. They were never seen again. Incredibly sad. But is it plausible? Let’s examine a few questions here:
- What kind of a flute could lure both rats and children? Wouldn’t the frequencies
required be different? Could children hear the same frequencies as rats? - Where did he take all the rats? What would stop them from coming back again?
- Why did he steal the kids? Why not lure the town managers away? Wouldn’t it be nice if we could get rid of our politicians that easily?
- Most importantly, what happened to the kids? If they survived, how would the Piper feed hundreds of kids? If they did not survive, how did he kill them? Would the Piper really have been nasty enough to murder hundreds of little children? And if he did, who would ever hire him again?
Lots of questions but we simply accept the story as it is told. And that my friends is the problem. We go through life simply accepting fairy tales without ever questioning them. For instance, the Trickle-Down Fairy Tale. This tale says that if we give lots of money to the rich, the money will somehow work its way down to the poor. Most poor people I know believe this fairy tale. Most poor people are still waiting for it to happen.
Deconstruction is defined as “A method of critical analysis of philosophical and literary language which emphasizes the internal workings of language and conceptual systems, the relational quality of meaning, and the assumptions implicit in forms of expression.” I am going to use this concept loosely to look at several old and new fairy tales. We will look to see if we can find the obvious truths that we take for granted. Searching for the truth often requires us to cast common myths and assumptions aside and pursue the dangerous and mysterious. I am going to apply deconstruction to the enigmas (“A person or thing that is mysterious, puzzling, or difficult to understand.”) and conundrums (“A confusing and difficult problem or question.”) that are inherent in most fairy tales.

Cinderella:
Once upon a time there was a lonely and mistreated girl named Cinderella. Cinderella is a popular fairy tale with its stereotypical evil step-mother and beautiful but hapless heroine. Cinderella lived with her two stepsisters and her evil stepmother who made her life hell. But along came a fairy Godmother who turned things around for Cindy. Throw in a handsome prince, money and a giant castle and you have the stuff of a fairy tale that still thrills young girls and would be princes. But I have a few questions:
- Ok, I will give you the fairy Godmother with superpowers to transmute organic material into other organic material (mice to horses) as well as pumpkins into a carriage. But if she has such powers why can’t they work past 12 Midnight?
- What was Cinderella’s plan after the prince fell madly in love with her? Was she going to get anything else from her stepmother to help with next steps? It does not
seem like there was any long-term strategic plan here. - Do you really think that the King would let his heir apparent marry a commoner, no matter how beautiful she was? If that was the case, why couldn’t the fairy Godmother give Cinderella a million bucks or at least make her a princess?
- Where would Cinderella learn palace etiquette? Would she be accepted in court with the manners of a scullery woman? I doubt it. I think divorce would have been pretty quick.
- What about the poor stepsisters? So they were ugly. Doesn’t this story smack of discrimination on the basis of looks and beauty? Where was the Godmother for the two ugly stepsisters? Seems to me that they were the ones who needed the most help. All Cindy needed was a makeover and a gown, but the two sisters needed extensive plastic surgery.

Anybody Can Be President in the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave:
This is a wonderful fairy tale. It is one that we all grow up hearing and ultimately believing. “In the USA, anyone with drive, passion and a vision can be President of the USA.” But let’s be realistic. Looking at the statistics, we see that:
- 44 out of 45 Presidents have been white
- 45 out of 45 Presidents have been male
- 36 out of 45 Presidents had a net worth in today’s dollars of >$1,000.000
- 0 out of 45 Presidents have been Latino
- 0 out of 45 Presidents have been Asian
- 0 out of 45 Presidents have been female
- 0 out of 45 Presidents have been Native American
Not since Harry Truman (1953) have we had a president worth less than one million dollars net worth. Now if there are 328,000,000 people in the USA and we subtract from the total amount of people living in the USA those with little chance of becoming President, (I list each of the above characteristics that do not seem to play well with one’s odds of becoming President) we can see how many people really do have a chance of becoming fulfilling this fairy tale.
328.2 million people in the USA (2019)
-76.29 million Black and White men under the age of 35. (Must be at least 35 to be President.)
-73.29 million Black and White women under the age of 35
-85.1 million Black and White women over the age of 35 (Not good odds since none have made it yet)
-27 million Latino women
-15.4 million Latino men under the age of 35 (Not excluding Latino men over 35)
-9.7 million Asian American women
-4.66 million Asian American men under the age of 35 (Not excluding Asian American men over 35)
-3.2 million Native American women
-1.77 million Native American men under the age of 35 (Not excluding Native American Men over 35)
I have not forgotten LGBTQ people, but I have not found a way to eliminate them by ethnicity or gender from the general census data. I did not subtract Asian American, Latino or Native American men over the age of 35 who I think may still have a better chance of being president than a woman. African American men over the age of 35 are also included since their probabilities are now somewhat higher since President Obama’s election.
Subtracting the groups that are not likely to see a presidency in the near future we are left with: 31.79 million men over the age of 35 who have a chance of being president.
We will assume that you will likely need to be a millionaire to be elected President. 5.8 percent of the US population are millionaires. Let’s estimate that between 3 to 4 percent of all millionaires are either males over the age of 35. The rest of the millionaires being either female or males under the age of 35. Then we multiply 31.79 million x 5.8 % to find the Final Total number of people in the USA who may rightfully feel that they have a chance to be president. Trumpets please. The final number is:
1.113 million
Thus, if you are born in the USA, and you are a male over 35 who is rich your chances of becoming President are about 1 in a million. White males will no doubt continue to hold an advantage for the foreseeable future. Well, at least that is better odds than winning the lottery. However, the lottery pays a lot more.

Goldilocks and the Three Bears:
Once upon a time there was a mischievous and naughty little girl named Goldilocks. Goldilocks was spoiled rotten by her parents who gave her everything she wanted. They named her Goldilocks because of her bright yellow hair. One day Goldilocks decided to go out for a walk in the woods. She soon came upon a small cottage and decided to peek in the windows. She was a very nosy child. Upon looking through the window, she spied a table with three bowls of hot porridge just sitting there. She did not see anyone inside and decided that she was hungry and that she was entitled to a bowl of cereal. She held the belief that everything belonged to her and that included the porridge. She tried the door and upon finding it open, she entered the home.
Have you noticed that Cowboy Stories, Comedy Romances and Fairy Tales all have happy endings? For the rest of us, it’s death and taxes.
At this point, I am sure that you remember the rest of the story. She eats three bowls of porridge. Do you think she was maybe obese to begin with? She breaks the little bear’s chair when she tries to sit on it. Proof that she was too fat! And then messes up all the bear beds and finally gets caught by the bears when they come home. At this point, Mama bear would probably have messed up the kids face for messing with her nice clean beds. But as far as I know, Goldilocks gets out alive and runs home where her parents continue to spoil her rotten. So a few questions to deconstruct things if you will indulge me. I will give you the anthropomorphic bears as a gift even before we begin.
- How did a fat kid get so far into the woods that she found a bear den or cottage?
- Where did the bears purchase their furniture and porridge? Do fairy tale bears shop at the same stores as humans?
- Bears can run at speeds upwards of 30 mph, how come they could not catch Goldilocks?
- Why were the bears eating porridge? Is that a traditional bear food?
- If the bears lived that close to other human dwellings (Assuming a fat kid could not walk too far) how come no one warned Goldilocks about the bears?
- What is the moral of this story anyway? Spoiled kids should not mess with bears or eat porridge that does not belong to them?

The United States of America is the Greatest Democracy on Earth:
This is one of my favorite fairy tales. According to this story, there was this exceptional group of people who banded together to form a more (and almost) perfect nation where democracy ruled. It would be a government of the people, by the people and for the people. According to the Fairy Godfather, who was named Thomas Jefferson, everyone in this country would be free except: Black People, Indian People, LGBTQ People and Women.
This country would be based on a democratic form of government where each person had one vote (Except Black People, Indian People and Women). Representatives would be fairly elected and would make great and wonderful decisions for the people based on their superior knowledge and intellect. Democracy would be a rule of the majority with CONCERN for the minority. Thus Black people could continue to be happy down on the old plantations, women could continue to stay barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen and Indians could happily walk many miles to their new homes on the reservations. What a great place America would be.
There was only one snag though. Jefferson said that you could not really have a Democracy without two things:
- An educated citizenry who could make informed decisions.
- A free press which would keep people informed.

Now, in the fairy tale, voters are all given equal opportunity to vote. There is no voter suppression, Jim Crow laws or gerrymandering. A vote is a vote is a vote. Also in the fairy tale, the government is “for the people” not “for the Corporations.” Representatives are looking out for the best interests of the people and not big business. There are also no bad guys in the fairy tale. These are the things that make the fairy tale so great and insure a happy ending. In real life we have the greedy lobbyists, the corrupt politicians, the sycophantic followers and the corporations who buy votes. Real life does not have happy endings.
But before we finish with deconstructing this fairy tale, we must say something about Jefferson’s two conditions for a democracy noted above. In the fairy tale we have great public education systems where people are taught to think for themselves and to be able to tell lies from the truth. In real life of course, schools do not teach critical thinking and students cannot distinguish lies from truth. However, they are excellent at finding the right answers to exam questions.
Turning to the issue of a free press, in the fairy tale, we have courageous journalists who seek out the truth and who will print it regardless of the consequences. In the fairy tale, journalists are motivated by a desire to inform the public and to ensure that information about critical issues is widely available. In real life, most journalists are hacks whose major skills involve writing good clickbait lines to draw you into an extensive amount of advertising designed to make money for the corporations running their newspaper. Profits and not information are the motivators in real life for newspapers and media.
So there you have it. I have deconstructed some major fairy tales. If you live in the USA, I am no doubt sure that you have read or heard of all of these. Just to be clear, I love fairy tales and the fantasies that they give us. Without fairy tales, we would have to live in the real world 24/7 and who could do that without going out of their minds?
“There must be possible a fiction which, leaving sociology and case histories to the scientists, can arrive at the truth about the human condition, here and now, with all the bright magic of the fairy tale.” — Ralph Ellison

Most of what people learn about Marx is far removed from his actual ideas. Given that Capitalism has been diametrically opposed to the very name of Karl Marx, it is not surprising that he is routinely disparaged. Even at the University level, it is rare to find anyone studying Marx very deeply. Many educators and instructors describe Marx’s economic theories as “Totally Discredited.” Few people in America have any good words for Karl Marx. Any politician in the USA who might suggest that Marx ever said one good thing or had one good idea would court instant political death. Marx is the devil in our Capitalistic system.
Marx did of course hate capitalism. He saw Capitalism as a system that exploited workers and allowed the greedy to benefit at the expense of those less fortunate or less aggressive.
The antipathy directed towards Marx and his critique of Capitalism has discouraged any real in-depth understanding of the limits and myths of Capitalism by most Americans. Capitalism resides in America on the same level as Mom, God, and Apple Pie. Woe to anyone who would dare to attack Capitalism. In the United States, Capitalism is as hallowed an institution as Christianity. In fact, most Christians think that Capitalism and religion go hand in hand, which to a large extent they sadly do. Unfortunately, not all Capitalism is the same. In America, we have a home-grown version that is more appropriately called Corporate Capitalism. What is the difference you might ask? Well it gets even more complicated since economists define four types of Capitalism. These are: 
Over the past 40 years, the Supreme Court has radically expanded constitutional rights for corporations. The original charters for corporations written in the late 19th century, allowed corporations powers never before seen in companies. The abuse of these powers soon led to a considerable amount of legislation designed to reign in some of the most egregious of these abuses. Laws such as the Sherman Anti-Trust Act passed in 1890 to stop monopoly practices and the Clayton Antitrust Act passed in 1914 to stop unethical business practices were somewhat successful at ameliorating corporate abuses. Unfortunately, corporations were still left with considerable power to thwart the goals of democracy and good government.
Corporate interests easily dominate the interests of the common person. The common person has nowhere near the financial clout of corporations. In 2010, the Supreme Court passed the Citizens United Decision which gave corporations unlimited power to finance and support political candidates running for office as well as to lobby on behalf of any laws that they wanted. This decision basically upheld the idea that corporations had a right to free speech much like any citizen of the USA and that campaign spending was simply a manifestation of free speech. Corporations are now being treated as living breathing people despite the fact that corporations can live forever, and corporations are not organic entities. They are not born, and they do not die like any other creature on the face of the earth.


One of the most popular movies in the eighties was Wall Street. In the movie, Michael Douglas gave a “Greed is Good” speech which was actually applauded by audiences all over the United States. Some corporations have been sued by stockholders for not being greedy enough.







There have been many theories proposed for the policies held by Trump and his Republican supporters. They include “Greed Theory.” The Republicans are held to be greedier than most people and only want to accumulate as much money as they can. Another is “Hate Theory.” This theory holds that since most Republicans are White European in ancestry, they loath and detest any people who are different then they are. This includes Asians, Blacks, Indians, Latinos and any immigrants not from Europe.

About a week later, I was substitute teaching in a Casa Grande High School. I drew an eleventh-grade social studies class. The teacher had left an assignment wherein the students had to find certain terms and concepts associated with the second industrial revolution and write definitions for each of them. Included among such terms as: robber barons, corporations, patents and trusts was the term “Social Darwinism.” One of the students asked me to explain it beyond the simple definition she found on line. I tried to recall my ideas relating to this concept from many years ago. I gave her my explanation and then later I looked up the definition at Wikipedia. I was struck at how well my memory had served me. It was at that point that the proverbial light bulb or blinding light of inspiration hit me. I suddenly realized that the Republican Party was not just trying to create elite systems but they were also trying to build on the theories of Herbert Spencer. The following excerpt explains this theory very well as it applies to many current concepts such as: trickle down theory, privatization, corporate welfare and tax reform.
So, there you have it. Trump and the Republican Party are not greedy, hateful or fearful of others, they simply do not believe that you have a right to anything unless you are also rich and successful and White like they are. Based on the concepts of Social Darwinism, they have the right to whatever you have if they can find a way to take it away from you. If you cannot keep it, that means you are inferior. If you are inferior, you have no right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. According to Social Darwinism, the elite will eventually Trump the poor because they are stronger, smarter and more fit. This will eventually result in a society wherein everyone is fit, and everyone is trying to screw everyone else.





