In previous blog posts, I discussed two men whose lives had been damaged by false claims. The claims misrepresented the truth and attempted to replace truth with slander designed for one purpose. That purpose in both John Kerry’s case and John McCain’s case was to impugn them because of political positions they had taken on certain issues. The truth did not matter. The heroism of both men did not matter. The damage to them personally did not matter. The only thing that mattered to the propagators of these insults and lies was whether or not they could successfully destroy the reputation of two men and minimize their political influence.
In the case of Kerry, the lies were intended to prevent his run for the presidency. In the case of John McCain, the lies were spread to nullify his influence in the Senate and as a revenge for his taking positions that were deemed inimical to his parties preferred interests.
I sent the following query to ChatGPT concerning these attacks. I am going to post my query and show you the information that this AI engine gave. Keep in mind, this is a non-partisan reply not attached to any efforts to extort money for any reason.
“What were the motives for the attacks against Kerry and McCain?”
The motives behind the attacks on John Kerry and John McCain—both decorated Vietnam veterans—stemmed from a mix of political, personal, and ideological factors. Despite their military service, both men became targets for smear campaigns, often by fellow veterans or political opponents. Here’s a breakdown of the key motives for each:
🎯 Motives for Attacks on John Kerry
- Political Opposition (2004 Presidential Election)
- Kerry ran against incumbent President George W. Bush in 2004. As a decorated Vietnam veteran, Kerry’s service was central to his campaign.
- Bush supporters sought to neutralize Kerry’s military advantage, particularly since Bush himself had avoided combat in the Texas Air National Guard.
- The Swift Boat Veterans for Truth aimed to undermine Kerry’s credibility and patriotism, casting doubt on his war record and medals.
- Ideological Resentment (Anti-War Testimony)
- After returning from Vietnam, Kerry became a prominent anti-war activist, famously testifying before the Senate in 1971.
- He accused U.S. troops of war crimes—a stance that many veterans found deeply offensive and betraying.
- Several of his attackers served in Vietnam but not with Kerry, and harbored long-standing anger toward his anti-war activism, not just his candidacy.
- Personal Animosity
- Some individuals in the Swift Boat group had personal disagreements with Kerry going back to the Vietnam era.
- The group’s leader, John O’Neill, was recruited by the Nixon administration in the 1970s to publicly rebut Kerry’s anti-war testimony—making it a decades-old ideological feud.
🎯 Motives for Attacks on John McCain
- Political Intra-Party Conflict
- McCain frequently clashed with the Republican Party base and right-wing activists.
- During his 2000 and 2008 presidential campaigns, McCain was seen as a “maverick” who criticized party orthodoxy, making him a target for hardline conservatives.
- Activists like Ted Sampley accused him of being untrustworthy and disloyal to conservative causes.
- Ideological Extremism
- Groups like Vietnam Veterans Against John McCain promoted conspiracy theories claiming McCain was a “Manchurian Candidate” or communist collaborator—a narrative entirely without evidence.
- These were often fueled by Cold War-style paranoia and deep distrust of the U.S. government, especially among fringe veteran groups.
- Retaliation for POW/MIA Reform
- As a senator, McCain worked to normalize relations with Vietnam and debunked myths that American POWs were still alive there.
- This angered POW/MIA advocacy groups, some of whom believed the U.S. government was covering up the existence of missing soldiers.
- McCain’s efforts were seen by these activists as a betrayal of the POW/MIA cause, despite his own 5½ years as a prisoner of war.
🧾 Comparison of Kerry vs. McCain Attacks
| Category | John Kerry | John McCain |
| Primary Political Motive | Undermine 2004 campaign | Undermine Republican campaigns in 2000 & 2008 |
| Core Smear | Falsified war record, dishonorable discharge | Collaborated with enemy, “Manchurian candidate” |
| Main Accusers | Swift Boat Vets (not same unit) | Fringe veterans (Sampley, Kiley) |
| Real Underlying Motive | Anger over anti-war activism | Resentment over POW/MIA policies and intra-party clashes |
| Impact | Damaged public perception, coined “swiftboating” | Less impact, largely discredited |
✅ Final Insight
The attacks on both men were rooted in a combination of politics, personal vendettas, and ideological warfare. What’s ironic is that both Kerry and McCain were legitimate war heroes, yet were attacked not for what they did in combat, but for what they did afterward—one by opposing the war, the other by seeking reconciliation and compromise.
These smears illustrate how military valor doesn’t shield someone from political weaponization, especially in the age of media spin and partisan polarization.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Conclusions:
Over the last 100 years, the USA has witnessed a decline in morality and ethics. Greed while always a pervasive influence in the world has become a hideous monster that lurks behind every deal and transaction that is now made. An entire Congress, Supreme Court and Presidency is run by greed and self-interest. A so-called Christian nation, Jesus would not recognize many of his followers. Men and women who want to return the country to a state where money and economics are the raison d’etre for being. The United States has been coopted by a lust for power and money. The Shining City on the Hill no longer shines because of its Virtue. It shines because of the reflection of the sun on its cheap gold plating.
The lack of virtue and morality in the country is amplified and reflected by a media that has one purpose: Make as much money as it can for its corporate sponsors. Congress exists for the same reason. Politicians are guided by the rule as well. Make as much money as they can for their corporate sponsors. The man sitting on the throne whom we call a President knows he must also direct the country towards making as much money as he can for his corporate sponsors. Courts, military, and every legislature in the country are guided by the same rule: “Make as much money as they can for their corporate sponsors.”
Friends of mine inevitably bring up these questions: “Can we do anything about it? Is there any way to get the train back on its track? What is possible in the face of so much corruption and greed? What if we keep going in the same direction? Are we witnessing the end of the American Dream?”
I want to say that hope only disappears when we become hopeless. Where there is hope, there is possibility. Regardless of how dismal and dark things are, they can only become darker if we give up all hope. These are more than, “The times that try men’s souls”. These are horrible times that destroy hope. I wonder what history will say in 50 or 100 years about the terrible things America is doing to the world in the name of Exceptionalism and National Pride.
In truth our actions are based on the same evil that destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. The same evil that built the Golden Calf. The same evil that has forever driven the wars and desecrations that infect civilization. It is a disease that we have never found a vaccination for. A disease that has gone from a minor infection to a pandemic. It is a disease for more and more and more. And the remedy that those infected with it find lies in more money, more things, more power, more and more and more. And the media spreads the virus and disease with every kernel of its existence. From text, to video, to radio, to the internet, the one constant is the media beating the drum for more and more and more. Buy more and you will be happy and successful. More is the secret for salvation. You will only go to heaven if you have more stuff than your neighbors.
So, buy now and don’t wait.











Two thousand years ago, the Roman Empire started its decline after having been the greatest empire that the world had yet seen. Many historians point to the decadence of the Roman Empire during its decline. “Decadence” is defined by the Oxford On-Line Dictionary as, “Moral or cultural decline as characterized by excessive indulgence in pleasure or luxury.” The Romans had their “Bread and Circuses.” The Oxford Dictionary defines “Bread and Circuses” as, “A diet of entertainment or political policies on which the masses are fed to keep them happy and docile.” For many, football and politics are the bread and circuses or our American Empire. I think the rot and decay in America today goes much deeper than that. Here is my list of some of the decadence that I see in the USA today:

I have another T-Shirt where I list the “No Exceptions” groups that somehow seem to be conveniently overlooked by many Cultural Christians. The major fallacy that many Christians seem to observe is to define their neighbors as either someone in their own church or in their own social group. When Jesus included the Samaritans who were an outcast group at the time as his neighbors, this should have made it clear that you must go beyond your tribe or friends to include other nations, other ethnicities, other religions, and other people with different beliefs as your neighbor.





A few more months went by and one day I decided to come home from work early. As I entered my house, I heard screams coming from upstairs. I went to a desk and grabbed a loaded Colt Commander 45 ACP that I kept ready for emergencies. I feared that Ashley was being attacked by some unknown intruder. I ran up the stairs and into our bedroom. There on the bed was Ashley and one of the young lawyers from my old law firm. They were both nude and she was on top of him riding him like a bucking bronco. What I thought were screams of pain were screams of ecstasy. I had never heard anything like that from Ashley during our entire marriage.





We shop till we drop. We invoke our privilege to use our money as we want to. We make holidays out of holy days where we spend our time hunting for bargains and sales. Greed has now become a sacrament. Greed is no longer evil. Greed is holy. Greed is the American Way of Life. Millions of Americans adore the wealthy. The story of Lazarus holds no credibility – Luke 16:19-21. Nor does the story of the Rich Fool – Luke 12:13-21. Money is sacred and those who have more are worshipped by Americans and exalted as better people and better leaders. We elect millionaires and billionaires to Congress and even the Presidency on the sole basis of their acumen at having stored up wealth.






Ladies and Gentlemen. How can you have a government of the people, by the people and for the people when it is a government of the rich by the rich and for the rich? A government of lawyers, political science majors and corporate people. An interlocking network of proponents who have a self-interest that nowhere matches the nature and interests of the general public of America. 
Many of the board members in the rural counties are farmers or laborers or educators who have little or no training in the laws that they are sworn to protect. Thus, they rely heavily on the lawyers that they hire to provide advice and perceived protection from lawsuits. This renders the board members subject to the legal opinion of the lawyer which is quite often at odds to what the public wants. The boards are frequently fearful of a lawsuit (often offered by the lawyer as a possibility) and will forego making an informed decision based on evidence that is presented at the hearings.
We need less lawyers. Lawyers and lawsuits are destroying America and Democracy. We need leaders with more diversity in education. We need leaders with more ethnic diversity. We need leaders with more gender diversity. We need greater representation that reflects the demographics of America. We need less lawyers. We need more justice and we need more fairness. 


