Robert Reich and I have at least one thing in common. He hates bullies and so do I. In his most recent book, “Coming Up Short”, he talks about how he had to deal with bullies because he was so short. My dad was 6’4” tall and could often be a bully. I had enough abuse from him growing up that I also came to hate bullies. I had many fights when I was younger where I defended either myself or equally often other people physically against bullies. Robert Reich points out that one major reason for Trump’s popularity is that he is a Bullie’s Bully. Millions of Americans who have been bullied by an unjust system of economics, education, justice, health care and government see Trump as their protector or even savior. Reich notes:
“A large portion of America has felt bullied and harassed for decades. They’ve worked their asses off but haven’t gotten anywhere. Employers have fired them without cause or notice, made them into contract workers without any security or rights, spied on them during working hours, and otherwise treated them like children.
They’ve been bullied by landlords who keep hiking their rent. By banks that keep adding large fees to whatever they owe. By health insurers and hospitals that charge them an arm and a leg. By corporate grocery monopolies that push up food prices.
Many of them voted for Trump because he promised he’d be their bully. He blamed others — immigrants, people of color, transgender people, foreign traders — for what they endured. He thereby found scapegoats for their deep feelings of powerlessness, vulnerability, and shame. It’s one of the oldest of demagogic tricks.
Democrats could have put the blame where it belonged — on monopolistic corporations and billionaires that abused their wealth and power by taking over our politics.
Democrats could have demanded higher taxes on big corporations and the wealthy to pay for childcare and eldercare. Tougher antitrust laws to break up monopolies. Labor law reforms that made it easier for workers to form unions and gain bargaining power. Universal health care. Strict regulation of big banks so they couldn’t shaft average people. And an end to big money in our politics.
But they have not — not loudly, not with one voice, not with the clarity the people need to hear.” — Robert Reich 8/24/25
The 2024 election is already being dissected in books and think-tank reports, but the clearest story is this: Democrats misread the electorate as well as deserted the electorate. Caught up in arguments over gender identify, abortion rights and WOKE manifestos, the Democrats preached to a crowd with more important concerns on their minds. Jefferson said that Democracy was a rule of the majority with a concern for the minority. Democrats have reversed his message. They now practice a rule for the minority with little or no concern for the majority.
They believed that campaigning on democracy and abortion rights would be enough to hold the White House. Those are vital issues, but voters were telling pollsters something else — they were worried most about the price of groceries, rent, and gas. In swing districts, immigration and border control loomed even larger. By downplaying those concerns, Democrats left the playing field wide open for Republicans.
Validated voter studies show that turnout favored 2020 Trump voters. Younger and non-white men — groups Democrats once counted on — swung toward Republicans in significant numbers. Many of these voters wanted practical answers on wages, security, and fairness. They didn’t get them.
So, what must Democrats do if they hope to regain the House, Senate, or Presidency? Three steps stand out.
First, make the economy the front page of their campaigns, with plain talk about jobs, housing, and cost of living. Find people who can speak the language of the average American and not in a voice only understood by Ph.D. graduates. I am often bewildered by the terminology that some of the Democrats throw out. Yesterday, I learned that the new vocabulary for “homeless” people is now “unhoused” people. Do the Democrats really think this is going to make a difference to the people living in cardboard boxes throughout America?
When I look at the new head of the Democratic National Committee (Ken Martin), I see a man who exemplifies everything that is wrong with the Democrats. If his bio on Wikipedia is to be believed, Ken never did a day’s physical labor in his life (At least not in any paid position.) What makes this an even more grievous fact, is that he was given this position after Harris’s loss to Trump. I doubt a guy with his background has any clue about the problems of the working class in America. By the way, I am sure Ken is a nice guy, a good husband and a good father. But that is not going to get Democrats elected.
Second, develop a credible immigration strategy that pairs border security with fair reforms. Like it or not, immigration has been a major issue for Americans because as Reich noted, both parties have demonized immigrants as vulgar, uncouth, criminals who only want to take jobs away from legal Americans. This is not an unusual state of affairs. Even Benjamin Franklin had his biases when it came to immigrants. Many of these changed over time as Ben observed the habits and ethics of other immigrant groups to the colonies.
I have said we need a “fair immigration policy” and not an “anti-immigration policy.” A number of years ago (at least seven) I wrote a series of blogs on the subject of immigration as I could witness it down here in Arizona. You might say that we are on the front lines of immigration and have a long history of immigration. The land I now live on was once part of Mexico until the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. Some of my neighbors have history going back to Mexico over two hundred years. See my blogs:
- Thinking about Immigration – Part 1: We Need a Fair Immigration Policy – Not an Anti-Immigration Policy!
- Thinking about Immigration, Part 2: Pros and Cons of a Fair Immigration Policy!
- Thinking about Immigration, Part 3: Living in the Path of Illegal Immigration.
Third, speak in everyday language. Too often Democrats rely on insider jargon that alienates working families. Like it or not, most Democrats have become associated with the idea of PC or political correctness. I am no enemy of using terminology that minorities and others find more respectful and less insulting. However, some of the PC efforts have become ludicrous and only help to make the Democrats laughing stocks and open to scorn from the very people they need to help support them. Here are a few examples:
- The use of “people experiencing food insecurity”
In May 2025, a debate over language use within the Democratic party was highlighted by the Washington Post. One specific example given was referring to individuals as “people experiencing food insecurity” instead of the more direct phrase “people going hungry” or maybe even people “starving to death”!
- The replacement of gendered terms like “spokesman”
The movement towards gender-neutral language has led to the replacement of many words to avoid implying a specific gender, regardless of the individual’s identity. For instance, the term “spokesperson” is often used instead of “spokesman” or “spokeswoman.” I have a problem remembering which words to use. Should I say fireman or fireperson? Should I say postman or postperson? Should I say fisherman or fisherperson? Of course I do not want to offend anybody, so the only answer is to say nothing? Or should I check with each fisherperson first to see what they prefer? How do you say fisherperson in Spanish?
- “Person of color” (POC) instead of “minority”
Some find the term “POC” to be an overly broad and imprecise label that lumps together many distinct racial and ethnic groups, despite its progressive origins. I am concerned about this label since I have always thought that being a White person I had some color. I realize that many people see White people as more pink hued than white, but pink is still a color even if I do not like the idea of being a Pink person.
In Conclusion:
Democrats do not need to abandon values of equality and freedom. They need to marry those values to tangible solutions that the average people can feel in their daily lives. They need to drop some of the bullshit that makes everyone think of them as WIMPS. They need to fight and not keep talking about “hands” across the aisle. When someone punches me in the face, I do not hand them a rose. If Democrats want a path back to governing majorities they are going to have to:
- Walk like the majority
- Talk like the majority
- Act like the majority
As long as Democrats insist on being isolated people who live in expensive mansions and go to exclusive Ivy League colleges, they will not have a chance to get back into power. Don’t tell me about their good intentions. As the saying goes “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.” — Saint Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153)










The Catholic Church in France was a major power. The Catholic hierarchy managed to continue to exert influence in France long after it lost power in other countries. The Catholic Church kept its power by a political collusion with the French monarchy which helped the Church fight off the Protestant religion that had swept so much of Europe. From the beginning of the Protestant Reformation, the Church in France along with the Monarchy had persecuted, exiled, and killed thousands of Protestants. Thus, there were many in France who hated the Catholic leaders as much as they hated their King and Queen, who by the way also lost their heads during the French Revolution.





A friend of mine once told me that you catch more flies with sugar than you do with vinegar. Over the years, I have been told that I am too negative. I have been labeled as a pessimist who more often sees the bad things in life rather than the good things. I have been accused of being a skeptic and even a nihilist. I have decided to turn over a new leaf. I am determined to share more positive thoughts in my blogs. I want you to see the world as a wonderful place full of joy and good will. I was going to start my new focus next year, but I decided “why wait.” “He who hesitates is lost.” Thus, I give you the secret to living the life that I am sure you want to live. Just BE:
Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy. Happy.
Hamlet posed his existential quest for life with the famous phrase “To be or not to be, that is the question.” I woke up this morning wrestling with a somewhat different question. I wanted to go back to sleep. It was too early to get up. It was dark and cold. I did not want to leave my nice warm bed but something inside of me was in war over the question of whether I can make a difference or not in the world. Am I a fool and charlatan or a man with meaning and purpose? You might say it was my pessimist side fighting with my optimist side. It seemed more like my nihilist attitudes battling with my existentialist attitudes. Or perhaps it is my cynicism versus my somewhat subdued optimism. I will simply call these two voices “Doom and Gloom” versus “Hope and Possibilities.” The struggle between the two voices went as follows.




A few more months went by and one day I decided to come home from work early. As I entered my house, I heard screams coming from upstairs. I went to a desk and grabbed a loaded Colt Commander 45 ACP that I kept ready for emergencies. I feared that Ashley was being attacked by some unknown intruder. I ran up the stairs and into our bedroom. There on the bed was Ashley and one of the young lawyers from my old law firm. They were both nude and she was on top of him riding him like a bucking bronco. What I thought were screams of pain were screams of ecstasy. I had never heard anything like that from Ashley during our entire marriage.

Somedays when we are on vacation, we do not go anywhere. We stay in a small apartment in some recently found village or town and cook meals, talk, and take walks around the area. No great jaunts to see any “Seven Wonders of the World.” Most of our trips are not cruises so we have few schedules. We get up when we want to. We go out when we want to. We see what we want to, and we come back when we want to. Often the sights that we see along the way are unscheduled and not in any travel guides. We became friends with a Swiss couple at a soccer match we happened to stop and watch one night. We traveled in China to a mountain where we spent the day climbing with a couple whom we met in China. The next morning all of us watched the sun rise over the mountain tops.



The concept of tracking time brings forth images of tracking some wild beast in the woods. Deer, moose, bear, cougars, tigers all leave very distinctive tracks. Time also leaves distinctive tracts. Time leaves physical as well as emotional tracks on all of us. Not to mention the tracks that time leaves on the environment. Emotional tracks are evident in the greater cautiousness and fears that we have as we age. From experience, once burned, we no longer want to get so close to the flame. Indeed, many of us will not even go near the fire again. Divorce, rejection, death, pain all leave emotional scars. For some of us they may never quite heal. Physical tracks show up as lines, creases, joint aches, hair thinning, broken bones and disease. I often joke that physically I am aging more like cheese then a fine wine. I am getting squishier and somewhat moldy around the edges.
Perhaps you see the idea of “tracking time” through a different lens. Maybe you have a need to track your minutes and seconds each day, a twist on tracking your dollars and cents. Perhaps, if you watch your time carefully, you may have more of it. Mark down your time spent each day in an Excel spreadsheet and carefully log your corresponding activities. This last task seems somewhat obsessive to me even though I am often accused of being a Type A personality. I once worked at a job where I was required to check my work in fifteen minute intervals each day and log what I was doing during each interval. After I left this company, I decided I would never again work for anyone where I had to justify myself at this level of detail. It was simply an exercise in obsessive control and domination.




