
I published the following blog a few months ago. I think it needs to be more visible. If you agree with the ideas in this blog, would you please share it with other people or groups that it might help. Democracy is in crisis today in America as never before. It has not ended with Trump being defeated since his followers and minions are still out doing their best to overturn Democracy in America. Only an informed and literate citizenship can defeat these efforts.
The number one subject for bestselling non-fiction books in the USA today concerns the chasm that separates Republicans from Democrats. Rural voters from urban voters. College Educated people from non-college educated. Conservatives from liberals. Fox viewers from CNN viewers. Your facts from my facts. Your truths from my truths. Your lies from my lies. Your views of reality from my views of reality.
This divide is decried by all the pundits and experts. Not one of the writers on this subject has anything good to say about the divide. Perhaps they harken back to the old saying, “United we stand and divided we fall.” Or the adage that, “A house divided cannot stand.” Whatever the reasoning, no one thinks that a USA as divided as it is with nearly 75 million people voting for Donald Trump and 80 million people voting for Joseph Biden is helpful for our nation. Keep in mind, it is not just the sheer numbers that alarm people, it is the magnitude of the crevasse that scares people.
The abyss It is so big that there is no bridging it. None of the sides can see the other side. None of the sides has any common ground with the other side. None of the sides understands the language that the other side speaks. We might as well be earthlings talking to Martians. There is no lingua franca. Many of the “well-meaning” experts exhort both sides to try harder to bridge the gap or to work more diligently to listen to the other side. It seems to be assumed that all it will take to jump the gulf is good intentions. I cry bullshit on this. As the old aphorism goes, “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.” It will take more than good intentions to heal the wound that infests our country.
Before we can fix what ails America, we must clearly understand what brought this divide about. What are the causes for this divide, and can they be healed? I see three main causes for this chasm. They are: 1. Greed, 2. Demonization, and 3. Media. Let’s look at each of these three elements and see how they contribute to the divide and what if anything can be done about them.
Greed:
Corporate greed and materialism have driven a wedge between the haves and the have nots in America. A larger gap than ever before exists between the rich and the poor. The number of people seeking free food and standing in line at food banks has only been higher during the Great Depression. The requirements for a digital elite versus a computer illiterate fuels the growing income gap. The Opioid Epidemic is only one symptom of this inequality in the USA. Many people cannot afford medical care or adequate housing as well as food.

For years now, materialism has been touted as the backbone of American commerce by corporations and the media. Inflammatory news events sell advertisements which drive people to the shopping malls, ball parks, restaurants, and performances. Special events like “Black Friday” abound where people, “shop till they drop.” There is a vicious spiral to these events since the final outcome is to keep people needy and wanting more. The theologian Matthew Kelly says you can never satisfy wants only needs. Pursuing wants will always leave you wanting more. Eating, sleeping, exercise and love are needs that can be satisfied and will bring you happiness. You can never be happy pursuing wants.
The wants advertised on the TV and in the media are never fulfilling. We have a nation of brainwashed consumers who mistakenly think that more toys, bigger houses, more guns, and luxury cars will make them happy. We are a nation on a never-ending treadmill of consumer materialism where like rats we keep spinning the wheel and hoping to find happiness, but happiness never comes, and drugs take its place.
There is no sanity in our economic system. It is a zero-sum game. It is a great deal like the lottery. Next week there will be 100 million losers, but one winner will get a billion dollars or more. The value for the lottery keeps going up which entices more and more people to buy lottery tickets, but the number of losers also keeps going up. Where do the profits for the lotteries go? Not back to the people, regardless of what they tell you. Our society is being sold hope where hope is the most elusive product in the marketplace.
As the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, the tensions in society grow ever more divisive. We see more road rage, more senseless shootings, more violence between men and women, less loyalty between employers and employees. The underpinning of society that should be based on human integrity and morality is replaced with an opportunism based on an amoral value system. Whatever we can get as long as we break no laws is considered to be moral. We see most politicians that have no commitment to anything except to collect more money so that they can stay in office. Their highest goal is to help the rich get richer, which of course includes themselves.
Jesus said that money is not evil, it is the pursuit of money that is evil. The evil in America comes from a frenzy for more that separates Americans from each other. Like a horse race where there can only be one winner, there are only going to be a few rich Americans and many more poor people scrambling to be the “King of the Hill.”
I do not believe that the divide in this country can be erased until we eliminate the gap between the rich and the poor. It is not simply a matter of conversation or discussion. It is a matter of inequality. A poor person cannot talk to a rich person unless they can shout over gated walls and armed security guards. The biggest divide in America is between the haves and the have nots. It is between the will haves and the may never haves. The haves in America expect to have more and probably will get more. The have nots do not know where their next paycheck will come from or whether they will be able to buy food for tomorrow. No amount of discussion or listening skills is going to solve this problem.
Demonization:
I am not talking about the devil here or about spirituality. I am talking about a kind of insidious propaganda that has been spread by many groups and individuals. In this propaganda, one side of America is labeled as moral, ethical, righteous, and just. The other side is the opposite. The other side is everything negative. The other side is a composite of all the demons and evils that Americans believe in. The other side are communists, fascists, atheists, anti-democratic, anti-patriotic and un-American. One side is good. The other side is evil incarnate. You cannot talk to evil. You cannot discuss with the devil why he wants your soul. You cannot debate with Satan over the values that he has. Heaven and hell do not have weekly discussion groups. The language heard today, and what the media publishes drips with hate, innuendo, and disdain. The language fosters violence. I doubt the Founding Fathers ever conceived that the First Amendment would protect such speech. There are three elements that contribute to a hate speech culture that demonizes the other side:
- Malicious Labeling:
Malicious labeling is the name calling that goes on between both sides today wherein each side is labeled. You can hear it on almost every talk show program in America today. Name calling and name labeling. Commie pinko leftists! Intellectual elites! Radical socialists! Racist rednecks! Fascist dictators! Politicians, commentators, newscasters, and radio talk show hosts all use malicious labels to insult and demean those they disagree with. What have we let this country become when we allow such name calling? This kind of hyperbole demonizes the other side and creates a divide that cannot be overcome by rational conversation.
“I think the political process has degenerated into name-calling and extremism, and I think that that’s unfortunate.” — Bill Bradley
- Anti-Government Diatribes:
I do not think that the Founding Fathers of our nation believed that Government was evil. Certainly, they felt that there could be too much government intrusion on the rights of the populace. They invoked certain safeguards to protect both human rights and states rights. Nevertheless, they did not demonize government and not a single one of the Fathers ever referred to government as evil. Edmund Burke, the famous English conservative said, “The government that governs best is the government that governs least.” He never said, “government was evil.” It has become common place to hear refrains denigrating the role and necessity of government. This steady drumbeat of antigovernmental rhetoric has created a group of people that have no value for government and who support the idea that government should be abolished.
“A primary object should be the education of our youth in the science of government. In a republic, what species of knowledge can be equally important? And what duty more pressing than communicating it to those who are to be the future guardians of the liberties of the country?” — George Washington
- Legal Advocates of Violence
A few years ago I began to wonder why groups like the KKK, Aryan Brotherhood, Antifa, The Proud Boys and many other such groups advocating violence against the government were not labeled as Terrorist Organizations. I asked a lawyer this question and he replied, “it is all politics.” I found that almost all the groups listed by the Southern Poverty Law Center as “hate groups” were designated as “extremist groups.” This means that they are not illegal, and they have the right to organize, march, rally and basically spread their hate across America. In 2019, The SPLC listed 940 hate groups across the USA. If any of these groups was labeled as a “Terrorist Group,” they would be on the same list as the Taliban, Boko Haram, The Mafia, Mexican Cartels and Al Qaeda. What is the difference between an extremist group and a terrorist group? It might surprise you to learn that a terrorist organization is defined as follows:
In the United States of America, terrorism is defined in Title 22 Chapter 38 U.S. Code § 2656f as “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents”.
In general, terrorism is classified as:
- The use of violence or of the threat of violence in the pursuit of political, religious, ideological, or social objectives
- Acts committed by non-state actors (or by undercover personnel serving on the behalf of their respective governments)
- Acts reaching more than the immediate target victims and also directed at targets consisting of a larger spectrum of society.
If this definition does not apply to the groups that tried to storm the US Capital on January 6th, 2021, I do not know what does. Just yesterday the Canadian government labeled the Proud Boys as a Terrorist Organization. This delegitimizes the group and takes their rights away. For Canada, it is a start. I am wondering when we are going to get started in the USA on such an effort. The First Amendment was never construed to allow hate speech and the advocating of violent actions to overthrow the government. Why do we not have the political will to outlaw these groups? We seem to have little compunction in penalizing Black groups like the Black Lives Matter Movement or the Black Panthers. We have a different standard when it comes to White Supremacy groups.
The Media:
The newspapers, TV and the Internet are today the major carriers for the hate and vituperation that has spread across America. On one side of the divide, we find the NY Times, the Washington Post and CNN News. On the other side, we find the NY Post, the Washington Examiner and Fox News. There are countless other purveyors of extreme and fanatical views. Each side reeks of headlines supporting nonobjective views and biased reporting. If objective reporting ever existed in the USA, it has been murdered and buried by the most pervasive media to ever exist. The media carries the hate and violence that is created by politicians, pundits, radio commentators and hate groups and ensures that it gets widely disseminated. Without the media, much of the divide would never have occurred. Hate needs a platform to be spread and the media is more than happy to host anything that it believes will sell itself and its advertising.
Conclusions:
We are not going to overcome the divide that separates Americans today by platitudes and wishful thinking. No amount of holding hands or singing kumbaya together is going to unite Americans. We have a systemic rot in our system that is caused by the extremism in politics and media that has created this divide. We need to enact reasonable laws to stamp out this rot while also protecting free speech but not hate speech. There is a difference between hate speech and free speech. If we cannot figure this difference out, we will never close the divide that exists in America today. You can defend the First Amendment all you want, but there are limits to everything and that includes so-called Free Speech.

Then-CIA director Gina Haspel said the US was ‘on the way to a right-wing coup’ after Trump lost the election: book

`I mean, what IS an un-birthday present?’
Do you see? If everyday is a possible un-birthday except your birthday, you may celebrate an un-birthday every day and get presents every day in addition to your birthday. Anything that is not “American” which I will assume includes: Mom, God, and Apple Pie, can be construed as “Un-American.” If you are out to condemn or harass people, it becomes an open-ended warrant to attack anyone who exhibits traits other than a belief in Mom, God, and Apple Pie. You have a 365-day open house to attack anyone in the USA who exhibits a philosophy contrary to what might be termed “Patriotic.” I find this rather scary since I don’ believe in God. I don’t like apple pie and I thought my mother’s cooking was terrible. My list of “Un-American” traits would take up several pages but I suppose I would be condemned simply on the basis of rejecting these wonderful characteristics of Americanism. By the way, I don’t like baseball, golf, football, basketball, or bowling.










with someone for an underlying motive or future advantage that they hope will accrue for their fawning behavior. People with integrity do what they believe is right whether or not any advantage will accrue from their efforts. People with integrity are consistent in their stated ideas and do not read the polls to see which way public opinion is blowing. 
Tolerance is the willingness to respect and stand up for someone when you are in the majority and they are in the minority. Difficult it is to speak out against your peers and tribe. When someone has an idea that does not fit with the normal conception, the tolerant person will try to hear them out. Tolerant people respect those with seemingly strange and weird or wild ideas. The tolerant person does not say “That is crazy or that is a stupid idea.” A recent example I think that shows both tolerance and courage is the song by Tyler Childers – “


believed that German blood defined a German race which was superior to other races. This superiority led to the extermination camps wherein “inferiors” were eliminated. These inferiors included many people from other “races”, religions, ideologies, and with different physical characteristics. There was one tribe of Germans and not belonging to this tribe was a potential death sentence. Hitler set up a pseudo-scientific structure to discriminate between “True Germans” and other inferior “races.” There never was and never will be a scientific basis for a German race, but this did not stop millions of Germans subscribing to the Nazi ideology of Germanic superiority.
If race does not exist but culture exists, what does this mean for group identity? How strong should group identify be? Should I sacrifice all for my group and fight to the death for my cultural identify? What if I believe that my culture is better than your culture? Could culture become just another banner to wave for those who want to commit acts of prejudice and discrimination on the basis of some perceived differences? I think this is a distinct possibility and has indeed occurred throughout history. How then can we have a cultural identify without resorting to racism and discrimination?

I was born on October 14, 1973 in Fayetteville, North Carolina. I grew up in Houston Texas. I was always big for my age and I loved sports where I excelled. I also loved music and was part of a hip-hop group called “Screwed Up Click”. My stage name was “Big Floyd.” I was or thought I was headed for greatness. Somehow though greatness never came. I did not make any major league teams and I never got any big breaks on the music scene. Like many young Black men with no foreseeable future, I stumbled into drugs.










I was born in Fairfield, Alabama and my grandparents had a farm in Ensley, Alabama. Years later and the farm is now ancient history and Ensley is a bunch of suburban homes adjacent to Birmingham. The cow paths, chicken barn, pig sties and goat pens are long gone. The rolling dirt road that once led to the Farmers Grain and Feed store is now a paved two lane highway leading to Walmart and CVS. I remember
many trips down this road beside my grandfather who always had a large quart canning jar full of ice and water and wrapped in a towel. When we arrived at the feed store, he would go in to purchase his feed and buy me an RC Cola from the metal soda box on the front dock. I would sit on the side of the feed store loading dock while the workers would pack his pickup truck with bags of grain and other assorted farm essentials. My grandfather would have a brief chat with the workers and we would be on our way back to his farm.
My grandfather supplemented his meager income by working at the Birmingham Steel mill. I remember when we would go to Birmingham at night. The sky would be full of smoke and sparks from the various steel mills in the city. The steel mills dominated
the city architecture and they owned the night. As we came closer to one of the mills, we would soon see the large red hot ingots lying on their side cooling off in the mill yard. Occasionally, we could see the huge ladles of red hot ore pouring out their contents into the casting molds. Sparks would fly everywhere and
the night sky would be lit up with flames streaking hundreds of feet into the heavens. It was almost like a fireworks show that went on night after night. I left the mills and Alabama when I left home in 1964 thinking that I would probably never see either of them again. I was wrong though.
tattoos, hats and t-shirts proclaiming:
It became apparent to me why I never took my first wife to visit my relatives. Deep down inside, I was both appalled and ashamed at their ideas and behavior. During our visit Karen and I listened to more prejudice and bigotry then I had heard in years. I retreated to an almost catatonic state. I did not once broach the subject of racism or discrimination despite the abundant evidence of its pervasiveness. My normal outspokenness for intolerance was stilled in the onslaught of insults and harangues that I heard towards Blacks, Mexicans and other minorities. It was like a Gordian knot of discrimination and I did not know where to start unravelling it. On our way home, Karen and I discussed our mutual inability to speak out or take any action in the face of this prolific bigotry. I perhaps more than Karen was embarrassed that I had said and did nothing. I had become the silent person who fails to speak out.





There are beauty products, breast enhancements, hair implants, plastic surgery, expensive cars, perfume, jewelry, large homes, designer clothes, college degrees and many other products or services designed to help you feel less inadequate and more adequate. We all want to feel adequate which means we must somehow learn to escape or jettison our inadequacy paradigms. The marketplace strategy involves spending huge amounts of money on a regular basis to escape the “inadequacy paradigm.” This strategy is often a failure as money and products cannot provide for real happiness or address some of the cultural biases, prejudices, racism and bigotry that contribute to the “inadequacy paradigm.”

If you have not read Hofstadter’s “Anti-Intellectualism in America Life” I heartily recommend it. I have often joked that the worst discrimination in America seems to be saved for people who think. Many companies trumpet their desire for “out of the box” thinkers. This is usually nothing more than a well parroted display of self-deception. What Human Resources and the company are really looking for is “people who fit in.” People who are iconoclasts, people who are critical thinkers, people who rock the boat “need not apply here.”
We have a pervasive problem that I labeled the “Inadequacy Paradigm.” Much of it is caused by racism, xenophobia, prejudice, stereotypes and bigotry. The majority of it is systemic and will need major changes in policies and institutions in this country to eliminate. However, it is felt on a very personal level. Feelings of inadequacy may be conveyed by others and cultural mores but they are received by an individual who assimilates these feelings into their psyche. Thus, inadequacy becomes a personal problem and not simply a social problem. Inadequacy is not “out there” it is right inside. The vast numbers of suicides in our society are testament to the inadequacy that many of our fellow citizens feel. This includes Whites as well as minorities.
We have a concept called the Double Standard which denotes a situation wherein some behavior is generally thought of as unfair, inequitable or simply wrong. It is a much used term employed by sexists and racists. It is generally used as an argument against some actions being taken on behalf of a minority or other exploited group. Such groups include immigrants, women, children, the poor, Native Americans, Blacks, Latinos and many other underprivileged groups or groups wherein an asymmetrical relationship exists with the dominant power group. Let me give you an example before I define some terms.
A friend was arguing about the laws impacting the actions that business owners may or may not take in terms of delivering service to customers. The recent spate of arguments by the so called “Christian” Right against serving gays and other minorities whose religion or beliefs they disagree with was the spur or nucleus of his rant. He made the following analogy. “Suppose a Black man went into a White baker to have a birthday cake made and he was refused service? What do you think would happen he argued?” The reply given by his audience was, “It would probably be seen as discriminatory or perhaps even illegal.” He then argued, “Ok, so suppose a KKK member went into a Black baker and asked for a cake made for a KKK celebration and he was refused. What do you think would happen?” I replied that this seemed like an argument “reductio ad absurdum” or something taken to the extreme absurd. His argument was that it was not ridiculous and such situations are typical of the differences between how Blacks and Whites are now treated in our country or that a “Double Standard” exists.
What if you were very poor and you were going out with a very rich person? Suppose you gave gifts to each other on your birthdays. You gave a modest low budget gift from Walmart to your loved one. She/he in turn gave you an all-expense paid two week trip to Paris. Would you scream and yell that this was an unfair double standard? Unfair because you could not possible meet such a standard on your much lower income? You might want to argue that the example I have provided is ridiculous. However, it is no more ridiculous an example that many of the examples given by opponents of civil rights, affirmative action, equal pay, immigration laws, welfare and other measures to help create a more equitable society. (PC opponents are often guilty of such ignorance and there are numerous situations wherein they perceive that Political Correctness has created an unfair Double Standard.)
First: on what basis do we decide the symmetry of a relationship? Should we be looking at power, wealth, status, employment or opportunities as measures of symmetry? Second, when and how do we decide that relationships have become symmetrical and no longer need a Double Standard? Both of these questions are very difficult but they are also both critical since unless they are ultimately answered, the perception of unfairness will hover over any relationships where a Double Standard exists. This of course leads to such accusations as “reverse racism” and even claims that “Today White people are the real people being discriminated against.” (See
The answer to the first question concerning metrics for determining symmetry is fairly easy. We need to look at metrics that will help to create a fair and just society. If we are attempting to create a level playing field for all groups in our country, then we must consider any measures that will help us to obtain this goal. There are measures for income, jobs, opportunities, education, incarceration and health that have and should be used to apply Double Standards when they will help to level the playing field.