
I wrote this blog seven years ago on Jan 21, 2018. Not much has really changed with the Democrats except that Trump was re-elected. I was an independent then and I remain an independent now. My biggest attitude change is that I see MOST Democrats as clueless and an impediment to the changes many of us want in America. I am not talking about the devasting and disastrous policies of our present so-called leader. I am talking about a set of policies that will build on the true American Dream for a Democratic nation founded on a separation of church and state and equally concerned for the minorities in the country as well as the majorities. A country where no one will tolerate constant wars with other countries much less a war between the haves and the have nots in our own nation.
Recently such people as Robert Reich, James Hightower, Bernie Sanders and many others even in the Democratic Party have echoed the sentiments which I noted seven years ago. I called it a party of cowards with no vision for the future and totally beholden to corporate money. I am not talking about the Republican party. My only defense for voting for Hillary, Biden and Harris is that I saw them as the “lesser” of two evils. It is a sorry state of affairs when millions of Americans either see no reason to vote or must choose between the lesser of two evils.
I have made very few changes in my original blog. Where noted my changes will be in { } and in bold lettering. Lets start off then seven years ago:
January 21, 2018
It’s been a year now since the bad dream or worst nightmare in the history of this country burst upon us. For many of us, we still cannot believe it happened. Never in America has a man with so little character and absolutely no qualifications to be president been elected to this office. In my lifetime, I have seen several presidents whom I did not think were good presidents. Nixon and Ford come to mind. I thought Clinton should have been impeached over the Lewinsky thing. I thought Reagan’s Star Wars Initiative was the height of stupidity. Neither of the wars started by either Bush did one thing to make America or the world safer. But the new president takes stupidity, arrogance and downright evil to new heights. Every day, Americans wake up to a Trump tweet declaring our hatred and belligerence to the rest of the world. If there was ever a great depression, it is the feelings that many Americans now share about the fate of their country. {This last statement may be the truest thing I have ever said}
I wanted to start a blog this week without going into another political diatribe or rant as some would call them. I know we all get tired of the unremitting bad news from the papers, radios, TV, Internet and incessant analysts that surround us like flies on poop. Bad news sells and in our 24/7 daily schedule of unceasing commercial bombardment, we now must hear bad news from any part of the world and not just our own local geography. If a mother murders her babies in Angola, we will see it on the front page of our local news. If a young woman is raped in France, we will be treated to a torrent of trending stories until they get tired of the story or catch the perpetrator. News is now not only 24/7, it is global as well.
Shortly after Trump was elected, the analysts started to figure out why Hillary lost. {Now they are trying to figure out why Harris lost} I think I counted over 20 different rationales for Hillary losing. Everyone had their theory. The idea of multiple causality seems to have eluded many as each pundit hawked their own explanation. I won’t bore you by subjecting you to the list. In a complex answer, each of these theories would be weighted and we would find that some carried more weight then others. Among the weightier was the issue of racism. Nevertheless, no single cause contributed entirely to Hillary’s defeat.
One issue is still important today. There is no longer any reason to worry about Hillary’s email server or about her seeming lack of warmth. These problems are water under the bridge. The problem though that is still substantial and that must be addressed concerns the problems within the Democratic Party itself. {Even more true today than seven years ago.} If the Democrats want to regain their former influence with Americans, they must do more than fight Trumpism. They must also stand for something. The Democrats may be looking better today {This is a real big maybe.} but that is only because the Republicans and Trump look so bad. The Democrats were once seen as the party of the working class and the champions of the underprivileged. They clearly lost this mantle in the years leading up to the Trump debacle. The Democrat Party has three big challenges:
- Moral cowardice
- New ideas and creativity
- Championing all classes as well as the working class

Moral Cowardice:
John F. Kennedy wrote a book called Profiles in Courage. It was about senators who defied the opinions of their party and constituents to do what they felt was right and suffered severe criticism and losses in popularity. One of the famous stories in Profiles in Courage concerned Senator Sam Houston. He was pulled from a train by an angry mob of constituents and threatened to be hanged because of his vote. He steadfastly faced the mob and explained why he voted the way he did and why he would do so again. Stories like this are rare and while that makes them inspirational, it also makes them sad.
We have a US Senate with 100 members and a US House with over 400 members. On any given day, most of these men and women are more concerned with their poll numbers than what is good for the America people. Partisanship has become the norm in Congress with both sides mutely aping their leadership’s call to “back their party.”
I remember well the drum beat to the first Iraq War called Desert Storm in 1990. A year before the invasion, I could hear the calls going out for an Iraqi Invasion. I looked for some logic for this war but could not find it. I waited for my political leaders to counter Bush’s need for an invasion. Almost everyone in Congress sat mutely by while Bush and his cohorts planned the invasion. Gradually, they found more and more reasons to invade Iraq. Gradually, the religious leaders jumped on board to support the administration. Billy Graham declared it a justified war and held hands with George H. W. Bush while he pretended to agonize over his already foregone decision. And still I waited and wondered why so few Democratic leaders challenged this war. Where were the Democrats?
The Second Gulf War was not a repeat of the First Gulf War. It was an even worse unmitigated disaster. Trillions of dollars spent, and nothing accomplished except to make some private war contractors rich. Where were the Democrats? They seemed to be out looking with the Republicans for the so-called Weapons of Mass Destruction that Saddam had supposedly stockpiled.
I had a button many years ago that said on one side “Democrats: The Party of Wimps” and on the other side “Republicans: The Party of Greed.” I do not know who printed this button but thirty years ago, the writing on the wall was clear. The Democratic Doves feared the Republican Hawks. Better to be labeled a Hawk than a Dove. The term liberal was once a term of pride but under the Democrats it became associated with wasteful spending and half-baked solutions to social problems. Bleeding heart liberal has now become a term despised by all.

New Ideas and Creativity:
I live in two counties. Both are predominantly Red Republican strongholds today. However, my county in Wisconsin was once a Democratic stronghold. Wisconsin was once a great bastion of Democratic ideas. It was a state that was proud to have produced such champions of the underdog as Fighting Bob La Follette, William Proxmire and Senator Gaylord Nelson. If anyone had ever told me that Wisconsin would have gone Red, I would have said they were crazy.
Now many of my “old” friends and many of my acquaintances in Wisconsin (A state I have lived in on and off for nearly twenty years now) are old line Democrats. I confess I would rather have Democrats for friends than Republicans these days. We share many of the same values even though I have never and will never be a card-carrying member of the Democratic Party or any other party. I take pride in voting as an independent and not someone mindlessly following some party.
I have been each year for the past seven years to the local county Democratic Fundraisers. Each year, I have listened to Democratic speakers who are jostling for political positions with hopes of defeating the Republican incumbents. In some cases, more recently they have succeeded. I can only hope this trend will continue but I am dubious. My skepticism comes from looking at the people I see running. Generally, they are well intentioned. Some might even have the moral courage I want to see in leadership. However, too many of the candidates that I have seen are either stuck in ideas from the past or lack new ideas that would bring some creativity and innovation to the Democratic Party.
Our political system not only needs new people, we need new ideas. The same old ideas that worked in the past will not work in the future. We need forward looking people that can challenge the existing system by promoting innovative ideas that do more than just support the status quo. Our education system, our health care system, our prison system, our military system, our legal system, our infrastructure system and even our electoral system are all in need of more than reform. They all need a complete restructuring. These were systems designed for the 19th and 20th Century. We need systems for the 21st and 22nd Century. It is folly to think that simple reforms or piece meal patches to these systems will fix the blight and decay endemic in them.
I see too few of the emerging Democratic leaders as having a vision beyond fighting Trumpism. That is clearly a start, but we need more than just reaction to Trump we need pro-action in our politics. We need positive ideas. We need new ideas. Good intentions are not enough.
{On Tuesday of this week (August 11,2025) I had a meeting with one of the local officials of the Pinal County Democratic Party. I wanted to show her how AI could be used in the upcoming mid-term elections to help sharpen focus and elect more progressive candidates. I was still hoping that since she was a newbie to the leadership, she might be open to some new ideas. Less than five minute into my synopsis of how AI (See the end of this blog for AI political information) could be used; she stopped me and said “Sorry, but I think AI is unethical.” I jumped back in and admitted that it did use huge amounts of energy but I retorted “True, it absorbs a great deal of electricity but if we do not elect some forward thinking candidates we won’t have any energy to worry about.”}
{“The Republicans with their denial of climate change and Trump with his dismantling of the EPA and clean energy will have destroyed the world as we know it.” She was unfazed and replied that “She had her ethics and that was all there was to it.” End of story. I parted company with her and realized that it was futile talking to her. I give you this brief story which is 100 percent true as just one illustration of what is wrong with the Democratic Party. A party that seems stuck in the past and wondering why they are losing races and no one wants to be associated with them.}

Championing All Classes as well as the Working Class:
Once upon a time, the Democratic Party was known as the champions of the working class. They stood up for unions, higher wages, income parity and equal opportunity. The working class was once the class of high school graduates. Today, more than one-third of the adult population in the United States has a bachelor’s degree or higher. The average earnings in 2016 for those ages 25 and older whose highest educational attainment was high school were $35,615. The average earnings for those with a bachelor’s degree were $65,482 compared with $92,525 for those with an advanced degree (Census.Gov). The composition of the American workforce has undergone a long evolution from the agricultural era though the industrial revolution to the new information era. Definition of working class has continued to change as social structure has changed in the age of computers and the Internet.
As educational levels continued to increase, aspirations by Americans continued to increase. Whereas once perhaps most Americans saw belonging to a union and retiring with a pension after 30 plus years to be the epitome of working life, that vision became obsolete. The typical worker today sees themselves as a college educated salaried worker whose interests are more aligned with their company then with any union.
My father worked for the Post Office for over 30 years before retiring. He never thought it was a fun job or an interesting job. For my father, it was a job that paid the bills, had good benefits and would enable him to retire with a good pension. My father’s aspirations and attitudes towards work were like most of his generation. The idea of being passionate about your work would have been a joke to my father and his peers. Times have changed dramatically. Workers today want to believe in their work and their companies. Workers want their jobs to be challenging, rewarding and fun. The old days of waiting to enjoy life until you retire are dead.
The workers in America are different than they were twenty or thirty years ago. The Democrats forfeited their allegiance to the American worker and allowed the Republicans to become the champions of the American worker. From coal miners to computer programmers, from trailer parks to gated communities across America, once proud Democrats have become Republicans. The sad part of the story is that the Democrats did not seem to raise a finger to stop the migration. They did little or nothing to prevent it from happening. They allowed the Republicans to become the standard bearer of wealth and prosperity.
Unfortunately, few workers realized that their Republican champions were more about privileges for the elite than sharing the wealth. Or that gains for the upper class would come at the expense of other classes in this country. The concept of Trickle Down is alive and well in the Republican Party.
Conclusions:
Democrats need to build a new party. Trumpism is a short-term aberration. {I don’t believe that this is true anymore. Trump might be short-term, but Trumpism should be a synonym for the Republican Party.} Euphoria might be high right now for Democrats who see Trump as the best thing to ever happen for Democratic candidates. With one of the lowest popularity ratings of any president in history, Trump will help insure a wave of Democratic Party victories. However, it can be nothing but short-sighted folly to mistake the present disgust for Trump with a disgust for Republican principles in general. The Republican Party became strong because they offered the American people a vision of society which promised a better life for millions of them. Unless Democrats can come up with a compelling vision of society that addresses a wide spectrum of workers, the Republicans will regain power once their debacle with Trump is over. {Actually they regained power despite ther 2020 debacle with Biden. One could easily lay the blame for this on Biden and the Democratic Power Structure.}
“However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.” — GEORGE WASHINGTON, Farewell Address, September 19, 1796
“If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.” — DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, speech, March 6, 1956
AI for Democracy: Smart Tools to Strengthen Progressive Wins in Pinal County
Goal
Leverage Artificial Intelligence to:
- Counter authoritarian messaging
- Engage and mobilize voters
- Support fact-based, progressive policies
- Data-Driven Voter Outreach
- Predictive Targeting – Use AI models to identify persuadable voters and low-turnout supporters for focused engagement.
- Issue Mapping – Match voters with the issues they care about most (e.g., healthcare, climate, reproductive rights).
- Turnout Propensity Scores – Prioritize outreach to those most likely to vote if contacted.
- Rapid Response to Misinformation
- Real-Time Monitoring – AI scans local social media and forums for emerging false narratives.
- Fast Rebuttal Drafting – Automated content library to push out fact-checks in plain language.
- Local Storytelling – Quickly create sharable, people-first content showing the impact of progressive policies.
- Volunteer Empowerment
- AI Chatbots – Handle volunteer signups, FAQs, and event reminders.
- Route Optimization – Maximize canvassing efficiency with AI-generated walking/driving maps.
- Virtual Training – Simulated voter interactions for canvassers to practice persuasive conversations.
- Personalized Communications
- Smart Messaging – AI crafts personalized emails/texts based on voter interests.
- Multilingual Outreach – Translate campaign materials into Spanish and other key languages (with human review).
- Micro-Videos – Short, tailored clips for TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook audiences.
- Building Trust in Democracy
- AI Listening Tools – Analyze community discussions to guide messaging and policy focus.
- Civic Media Creation – Produce short podcasts, radio spots, and graphics with clear, local facts.
- Moderated Virtual Town Halls – Keep online conversations civil, focused, and inclusive.
Ethics & Safeguards
- Transparency about AI use
- Protect voter data privacy
- Avoid deepfakes or manipulative falsehoods
- Focus on truth, empathy, and community building
Bottom Line:
AI is not about replacing human judgment — it’s about amplifying our ability to connect with voters, protect truth, and build a stronger, more inclusive democracy in Pinal County.




Regardless of whether the media intentionally want to keep the race close or not, there is no denying that the candidate who is the most obnoxious, the most outrageous and the most sensational will garner the most press. Trump has been well aware of this and has continually manipulated the media into providing him billions of dollars in free advertising. The fickle public seems to swing from one candidate to the other depending on who they see in the news. Trump has undoubtedly benefitted from his ability to keep the press absorbed with his every utterance regardless of how inane they are. He can tweet at 2AM in the morning and be assured that Fox News will carry his tweet on the 7 AM morning news.

Donald Trump is not America. Donald Trump is a creation of a media empire that is out of control. A media that trends sensationalism, exploitation, fear and paranoia to feed a 24/7 system of so called news reports. A system of glitz, glamour, ads, sound bites, commercials, sex appeal and worthless trivia that has little or no educational or informational value. It is a system that neither informs nor educates. It is a system that thrives on the likes of Donald Trump. It is a system that thrives on the exotic, the unusual, the strange, the bizarre, the kinky, the outlandish and the far out. Donald Trump is all of these things but he is not America.
Donald Trump is not even a real Republican. The party he claims as his own is one he and his small band (less than 9 percent of the total registered voters in the USA)* has managed to co-opt. The Republicans that I have called friends over the years want nothing to do with him. They are as appalled as the Democrats are at Donald Trumps rise to popularity in the media polls. Americans however should not be surprised at this. It is not the first time that a fraud, demagogue and charlatan has captured the media stage. Looking back through US history, we can find similarities between Donald Trump and the likes of Aaron Burr, The Know Nothing Party, Huey Long, The Silver Shirts, and of course Joseph Mc McCarthy. None of my Republican friends would avow affiliation with any of these characters. They are not America and neither is Donald Trump.
Every country in the world has its right and left-wing extremists. It has been this way for hundreds of years. Fortunately, in the USA, our political system usually kicks out the extremists and the middle ground or centrists have always trumped the left and right-wing fanatics. Due to our political system, we have escaped such maniacs as General Franco, Benito Mussolini, Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler. There are many drawbacks to our political system and chaos often seems to be a major characteristic of it. There are many people who would discard such a system in favor of stability and security. These people would buy such a political system at the cost of freedom and liberty. In many nations throughout the world, citizens select benevolent dictators rather than trying to deal with the vagaries and uncertainties that are often characteristic of a US style democracy.
Donald Trump says that he will create the largest wall that the world has ever seen, but it won’t keep out immigrants. It will only keep out ideas and innovation. Donald Trump supporters include the misguided and fearful who believe that if we only had less poor people, less immigrants, less refugees, less minorities, less disabled people and less women in power that “America Would Be Great Again.” This is a delusion held by those who dream of a bygone era when “Father knew best, Blacks knew their place and women stayed in the kitchen.” The myth of “The Good Old Days” is almost impossible to kill in a population fed on media mediocrity and where real history is either not taught or understood. Donald Trump will not bring back the “good old days” because the good old days where not really that good. Donald Trump will not “Make America White Again.”
What all of Trump’s bombastic speeches fail to note is that America is still great. Unfortunately, the things that make America great are hidden behind the media pronouncements of Donald Trump and his ill-advised followers. The ceaseless stream of bad news, crime, bizarre and weird news that titillates so many also deprives us of being a well-informed populace. In addition, our outlandish media system simply serves to hide the many great values that the USA stands for.
The message of hatred and intolerance that spews daily from Trump is something that one could pity Trump for if it were not so dangerous and belligerent. It is hard to feel sorry for the bully that is kicking other people when they are down. Somewhere though, we know that such bullies are really cowards. Their intolerance and lack of compassion towards others is driven by fear and insecurity. No matter how big and bad the bully seems, they are the biggest cowards in the playground. It is time to put Donald Trump and his followers in their places. There is no room in America for bigots, sexists and racists who are intolerant of and lack compassion for others. We need to keep America great by letting the world see the true values that guide our nations and not the distorted hate filled messages that the media loves to display.












On Tuesday and Wednesday along with my good friend Vic Ward, I attended the 52nd Nobel Conference which was titled: “In Search of Economic Balance.” It featured many illustrious and highly respected economists such as: Dan Ariely, Orley Ashenfelter, Paul Collier, Deirdre McCloskey, John List and several other well-known economists. After every lecture, there was a panel discussion where the speaker and several of the other economists had a chance to discuss and interact. Following these discussions, my friend and I debated, discussed and summarized what we thought were the most important points of each lecture. I attended eight lectures, six panel discussions and numerous discussions each evening with Vic.
On the way back from St. Peter, we stopped Jim’s Apple Farm when we saw a sign that said “Next exit, Minnesota’s largest candy store.” I bought several treats for Karen and the guys at the library in Frederic. Jim’s lived up to its billing. It may just be the largest candy store in the US. It is certainly the largest candy store I have ever been in.
Karen having spent thirty years of her life in Home Health Care is much better grounded and infinitely more knowledgeable than I am in this area. Many of the ideas in the conference sessions were basic for her but for me the opposite was true. I had my eyes opened and many of my concepts about conditions such as Dementia have now been thrown out the window. I cannot begin to describe how much I learned at this conference and how valuable the ideas were for me.
Over the past few months, the vitriol between Hillary supporters and Bernie supporters has increased in both intensity and animosity. I have had numerous arguments with Bernie supporters. I suspect many of them were once my friends and are now no longer so. This is interesting since you would think that we would have more in common than not. It would not surprise me if you were a Republican or Trump supporter and banished me from your Facebook, Twitter or any other list of friends that you maintained. However, it seems sad that so much rancor has been generated by the Hillary/Bernie battle as to result in lost friendships when we have so much in common. I must take some of the responsibility though since I am not and never will be one to shy away from a fight. If a fight is what you want, I will give it to you and no holds barred. I support my candidate and I will explain my reasons but when you get personal or insulting that is the end of the line. It would seem to be a line that is easily crossed and that reasons and emotions are two very different things.
Once upon a time, I thought debates were the answer to the question of “how do we discover the truth?” I thought that if you put two intelligent people together and each took opposing positions on an issue, that through the interplay of ideas the truth would emerge. If you think about this a bit, it is the basis for our judicial system in America. One side argues for the defendant, the other side argues for the prosecution or against the defendant. It is also the basis for an academic exercise called Dialectical Research or Dialectical Inquiry.
A dialectical investigation is a form of qualitative research which utilizes the method of dialectic, aiming to discover truth through examining and interrogating competing ideas, perspectives or arguments. This latter method is often applied through the use of case studies in which students or investigators discuss real world examples of complex situations. The purpose of a case study is to provide a more thorough analysis of a situation or “case” which will reveal interesting information to the reader. As I use them in my classrooms, my goal for my students is to help them understand how to better form strategies for success in business.
Unfortunately, in the real world the strategy of debate does not work. Debates are a waste of time when honest discussion takes second place to winning or looking good. Dialectical Inquiry is also often useless since the complexity of the subject can be beyond the ability of many students to grasp. Real world situations are froth with uncertainty, volatility, complexity and ambiguity or as some have called it VUCA. VUCA is an acronym used by the military to describe or reflect on the volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity of general conditions and situations. Many complex situations are seldom able to be accurately modeled leading in most instances to weak images or portrayals of the actual situation. This is why debaters opt for simple explanations rather than complex explanations. Another example of this watering down of reality is a Hollywood movie depiction of a supposed “true” story. Recent movies that come to mind include the following:
I have watched several of the debates now and I see no evidence that truth is being discovered. The debates have become hyperbolic spectacles of insults, half-truths, reality distortions, innuendos and petty personal attacks. I doubt if anyone has found much truth in these debates never mind elucidations of complex policy positions for any of the candidates. Trump
will build a giant wall. Cruz will fix Syria. Rubio will fix health care. Sanders will fix inequality in America. Hillary will fix Obamacare. Do you know how any of the candidates will accomplish these lofty goals? Of course not, since they know that the “debates” are no place for such a complex discussion. Trump perhaps realizes this fact better than anyone and has kept his discussion and clarification of his policy positions to less than fifteen second descriptions. The general consensus seems to be that if a candidate cannot explain their position on any subject in less than fifteen seconds, they are doomed, i.e., they lose.
On a more personal level, I have a problem with debates. I have a few friends who love to debate. I have noted as a result of recent discussions with them concerning the Presidential elections that do not want to understand or clarify any issues, they just want to argue or perhaps debate. I say that they want to argue, because their main agenda seems to be looking good or advancing their points and not understanding my points. They often enter into these contests (Since that is what a debate means to them. It seems to be a contest between winning their points and looking good or losing their points and looking bad.) with a pretense of trying to understand why I think or feel a certain way. Sometimes, they start the “debate” with a flat out rejection of my position or with a declaration such as “you are dead wrong” or “you don’t know what you are talking about.” I confess that such latter utterances often preclude my disposition to have a rational discussion with them. I see no point in it.